Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
Related links
-
Cited by Google -
Similars in Google
Share
South African Journal of Animal Science
On-line version ISSN 2221-4062Print version ISSN 0375-1589
S. Afr. j. anim. sci. vol.55 n.5 Pretoria 2025
https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v55i5.01
The effects of supplementing prickly pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) powder on dairy calves' health and growth performance
P.M. MoshidiI; A.S. SindaneI; S. WashayaII, #; M.C. MuyaIII
IDepartment of Agriculture and Animal Health, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa
IIDepartment of Livestock, Wildlife and Fisheries, Gary Magadzire School of Agriculture, Great Zimbabwe University, Private Bag 1235, Masvingo, Zimbabwe
IIIUniversité Officielle de Mbujimayi, Kansela, Democratic Republic of Congo
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of dietary prickly pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) powder and Lactobacillus supplements on calf growth and faecal pathogen counts. Prickly pear leaves were harvested, sun-dried for 14 days, and oven-dried at 105 °C, before grinding into a powder. Twenty-four female Holstein dairy calves (39.03 ± 0.75 kg live weight) were randomly assigned to each of the four treatment groups. The four treatments were: T1 : the control group, calves fed a basal diet (milk plus calf meal), without supplementation; T2: calves fed the basal diet plus Lactobacillus at 5 g/day; T3: calves fed the basal diet plus prickly pear powder at 2.5 g/day; and T4: calves fed the basal diet plus prickly pear powder at 5 g/day. These treatments were applied from four days of age until weaning. Calf starter feed and clean water were provided ad libitum for the entire study period. The dietary treatments affected the feed dry matter intake, feed conversion ratio, average daily gain, weaning weight, faecal total coliform count, faecal Escherichia coli count, and faecal Enterobacteriaceae count, compared to the control group. It was concluded that the dietary supplementation of Lactobacillus or prickly pear powder improves feed efficiency and body weight gain, as well as reducing faecal pathogen counts in Holstein dairy calves.
Keywords: body weight, cactus powder, enteric pathogens, growth, Lactobacillus
Introduction
Newborn calves are generally more susceptible to intestinal diseases (Frizzo et al., 2011), because of their immature and developing immune systems. In addition, the balance of intestinal microbes in calves is primitive, leading to a series of diseases, if no proper management practices are incorporated into the production system (Jiang et al., 2020). These factors lead to inefficient digestion and the poor absorption of nutrients (Morshedy et al., 2020). On intensive dairy farms, gastrointestinal infections in calves inhibit nutrient metabolism, delay growth, and predispose calves to diarrhoea and dehydration. Diarrhoea is the main disease causing calf mortality in dairy enterprises, and a number of enterobacteria can cause diarrhoea (Frizzo et al., 2011; Kodithuwakku et al., 2021). The high calf mortality rate in cattle production systems in sub-Saharan Africa is a subject requiring immediate attention (Scott et al., 2019). In traditional dairy farming systems, large quantities of antibiotics, in conjunction with electrolyte therapy, are used to reduce calf mortality rates (Cangiano et al., 2020; Casper et al., 2021; Kodithuwakku et al., 2021; Davies et al., 2022). However, there is a current push against the extensive use and misuse of antibiotics, because of the risks of antimicrobial resistance (Cangiano et al., 2020). Worldwide, antimicrobial resistance is a subject for debate, as it has detrimental effects on both human and animal health, and the spread of antibiotic-resistant genes via contaminated milk or meat products cannot be ignored (Mohammed et al., 2019). Therefore, the use of probiotics and growth-promoting substances as alternatives to antibiotics has been promoted (Frizzo et al., 2011; Cangiano et al., 2020; Casper et al., 2021 ; Kodithuwakku et al., 2021; Davies et al., 2022).
As reported by Guo et al. (2022), probiotics stimulate intestinal goblet cell mucus production, which lubricates the intestinal epithelium and protects the host animal from invasion and colonisation by pathogens. Tropical and sub-tropical environmental conditions promote the development of multiple enteric pathogens, with potentially devastating results (Busanello et al., 2021). The success of a dairy enterprise relies on the maintenance of a healthy cow-calf unit (El-mostafa et al., 2014; Morshedy et al., 2020), and the use of natural antimicrobial feed additives, particularly plant extracts, has therefore been on the rise (Marandure, 2016). The inclusion of agro-industry byproducts and medicinal plants in livestock diets is beneficial, as it can reduce the impact of livestock on the environment, reduce feeding costs, increase feed source alternatives, and offset human-animal competition for food (Morshedy et al., 2020). Plant extracts are the most plausible natural alternatives to antibiotics, as they have antimicrobial properties covering a wide range of microbes (Owusu et al., 2021).
Opuntia ficus-indica, commonly known as prickly pear, is a dicotyledonous angiosperm plant belonging to the Cactaceae family, and is remarkably well adapted to arid and semi-arid climates. Compelling evidence of the nutritional and health benefits of prickly pear has emerged in the last decade (El-neney et al., 2019; Moula et al., 2019; Morshedy et al., 2020; Busanello et al., 2021). Prickly pears are rich in amino acids, polyphenols, and polyunsaturated fatty acids, as well as in vitamins, compounds, and derivatives with biologically relevant activities. These activities include anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant, hypoglycaemic, and neuroprotective properties (El-mostafa et al., 2014). However, the effects of dietary prickly pear on calf growth and health status have not been fully studied.
It is widely recognised that factors that can alter the gut microbial community can benefit calf health (Jiang et al., 2020; Casper et al., 2021; Guo et al., 2022), and we therefore hypothesised that the addition of prickly pear to calf diets could promote a healthier gut. Consequently, the objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of dietary Lactobaciiius and spineless cactus (prickly pear) powder (CACP) supplementation on calf growth performance, as well as on the prevalence of selected faecal pathogens (Escherichia coii and Enterobacteriaceae), in female Holstein dairy calves.
Materials and methods
Ethical clearance for this research was granted by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Agricultural Research Council, South Africa (ethical clearance number: 2018/CAES/136).
Study site
The study was conducted at the Agricultural Research Council's Animal Production unit on Irene campus, in the dairy calf section, which is located at 25° 55' S 28° 13' E, at an altitude of 1523 m above sea level, in south Pretoria, South Africa.
Source and preparation of prickly pear leaves
Fresh spineless prickly pear leaves (Figure 1) were collected from an Agricultural Research Council unit situated in Roodeplaat (east of Pretoria), at 25° 44' S 28° 45' E, and at an altitude of 1524 m above sea level. The prickly pear leaves were harvested and weighed following the procedures described by Zeeman (2005), and chopped into 10-15 mm strips using a knife. The strips were naturally dried on a clean, dry cement floor using direct sunlight for 14 days, with frequent turning to prevent moulding (Zeeman, 2005). Thereafter, they were oven-dried at 105 °C for four to five days until a constant mass was achieved. The dried prickly pear samples were ground into a fine powder through a 1 mm screen (Wiley mill, Standard Model 3, Arthur H. Thomas Co., Philadelphia, PA), and were placed in plastic bottles and kept at room temperature until further analysis.
Chemical analysis of CACP
The crude protein (CP), crude fibre (CF), ether extract (EE), and phosphorous contents of the CACP were analysed according to AOAC (2000) procedure numbers 968.06, 920.39, 962.09, and 965.17, respectively. A Perkin Elmer atomic spectrophotometer was used to determine the calcium content. The neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF), and acid detergent lignin (ADL) contents were analysed according to the methods described by Van Soest et al. (1991). Briefly, 0.45 g samples were refluxed with detergent solutions for one hour using an ANKOM 2000 fibre analyser (ANKOM Technology, New York). Heat stable bacterial α-amylase and sodium sulphate were used for NDF analysis, and the fibre fractions are expressed in g/kg dry matter (DM), inclusive of residual ash (Table 2).
The flavonoid concentration of the CACP was determined according to method described by Zhang et al. (2009). A 100 g sample of CACP was suspended in 40%-80% ethanol at a ratio of solvent to raw material of 20-40, and was soaked for 4 hours. The mixture was then sonicated in an ultrasonic cleaner (model: KQ2200; rated power: 300 W; temperature: 40 °C; Kunshan Ultrasonic Instrument Co., Jiangshu, China) for 15-40 minutes. The resultant deep brown extract was filtered (Shoa Shong, Shanghai, China). The filtrate was passed through a D101 macroporous absorptive resin column (4.0 χ 60 cm; Fubang Chemical Science Technologies Co., Tianjin, China) at a rate of 20 ml/minute. The column was eluted with distilled water until the liquid produced was colourless, and was then eluted with 80% ethanol. The eluant was collected and evaporated using a rotary evaporator (model: RE52AA; Yalong Biochemical Instrument Co., Shanghai, China) under reduced pressure at 40 °C to obtain the flavonoids. After extraction, the total flavonoid content was determined using the aluminium chloride colorimetric method (Zhang et al., 2009), and the results are expressed as milligrams of quercetin equivalents per gram of CACP (mg QE/g CACP).
Animal management and data collection
After birth, 24 Holstein calves from primiparous cows of approximately 27 months of age and 450 ± 15.23 kg body weight were separated from their dams and housed in single-roofed pens, the floors of which were covered with black rubber mats and hay for insulation. Soon after birth, the umbilical stumps were disinfected with an iodine solution to prevent bacterial infection. The calves were fed fresh colostrum from their respective dams within two hours of calving, and for the following three days. Each calf was fed 4 L of colostrum per day (2 L in the morning and 2 L in the afternoon), using an open 5 L plastic bucket. Thereafter, the calves were fed whole milk plus commercial starter meal (91.2% DM, 17.5% CP, 18.75% NDF, 8.69% ADF, 0.65% calcium, 0.44% phosphorous, 1.17% potassium, 0.22% magnesium, 250.16 ppm iron, 46.08 ppm manganese, and 10.28 ppm copper; Meadow Feeds, Randfontein, South Africa) until weaning, as shown in Table 1. The calves had ad libitum access to clean water throughout the study.
Only female calves were used in this study because the Holstein cows used were inseminated with sexed semen. The calves were weighed at birth to determine their initial body weights, and were thereafter weighed every seven days before morning feeding until weaning at 42 days of age. The average daily gain (ADG) was calculated from the weekly weight gain. The calves were given weighed amounts of calf starter meal each morning, with the left-overs being weighed and recorded the following morning, prior to adding new feed, to determine the daily dry matter intake (DMI). The feed conversion ratio (FCR) was calculated using the DMI, and expressed as the kg of DM consumed over the kg of weight gained.
Experimental design
Twenty-four Holstein dairy calves from the Agricultural Research Council's Animal Production unit were used in a completely randomised design, to determine the effects of four treatments on growth parameters and faecal pathogen counts. The calves were blocked according to order of birth, after which they were randomly allocated to one of the four treatment groups. The experimental treatments were as follows: T1: (the control group) calves fed the basal diet (milk and commercial starter meal) without supplementation; T2: calves fed the basal diet, with Lactobacillus (Biorem biological products for calves, Reg number G0958, Act 36 of 1947) supplemented at 5 g/day; T3: calves fed the basal diet, with CACP supplemented at 2.5 g/day; and T4: calves fed the basal diet, with CACP supplemented at 5 g/day. The calves supplemented with Lactobacillus (T2) or CACP (T3 and T4) were fed these supplements from day four post-partum until weaning. The two products were mixed into their daily milk allowance, with 50% of the daily supplemented amount provided during each feeding time, at 09:00 and 15:00. In recent years, the use of microbial feed additives has gained popularity in neonatal calf production (Cangiano et al., 2020; Casper et al., 2021), hence the inclusion of Lactobacillus as an alternative treatment in this study.
Faecal microbial analysis
Samples for faecal microbial analysis were collected within the first 10 days post-partum. Six calves (40.5 ± 3.5 kg body weight) were randomly allocated to each of the four treatments (T1-T4). Fresh faecal samples (50 g) were collected in triplicate from the rectum of each calf by massage, using disposable sterile gloves. Samples were collected before feeding at three, five, and 10 days post-partum. The samples were transferred into tubes with white plastic caps and immediately transported to the laboratory (Jacob et al., 2008), where they were stored at -20 °C until further analysis. The total coliform count was determined according to ISO standard 4832 (2006), and the E. coli and Enterobacteriaceae counts were determined according to ISO 21528-1 (2004).
Statistical analysis
The daily feed intake and growth measurements were reduced to weekly means prior to analysis. Data were analysed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), within the general linear model procedure of SAS software (SAS, 2009). The model included calf as a random effect, and treatment and time (weeks) as fixed effects. Initial body weight was included in the model as a covariate. The Tukey (HSD) test was used for the mean comparison of treatments at the P <0.05 level. The statistical model used was:

where:
Ycgt = the observed value for body weight or DMI for calf c from treatment group g at time t; μ= the overall mean for the population;
αg = the fixed effect of group g, where g = T1 (control), T2 (5 g/day Lactobacillus), T3 (2.5 g/day CACP), or T4 (5 g/day CACP);
ßt = the fixed effect of time t, where t = week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6;
(αß)gt = the fixed interaction of the effects of group g and time t;
y(α)cg = the random effect of calf c, nested within group g; and
ecgt = the error associated with the measurement taken from calf c from group g at time t.
Results
The chemical composition of the CACP supplemented to the Holstein calves is presented in Table 2.
The effects of the four dietary treatments on calf growth and DMI are presented in Tables 3 and 4. The calves' average DMI values and initial body weights did not differ (P >0.05) between the treatments. There were similarly no differences in DMI between the treatments in weeks one, two, four, five, and six (P >0.05) post-partum; however, the treatments did differ in week three, with T1, T3, and T4 having higher DMI values than T2 (P <0.05). The calves in the T2, T3, and T4 groups had higher (P <0.05) ADG values than the calves in the T1 group. The opposite was true for the FCR, with the T1 calves having a higher (P <0.05) FCR than the calves in the other treatment groups. The average body weight at weaning was higher for the T2, T3, and T4 calves than for the T1 calves (P <0.05).
The results for the weekly body weight measurements are presented in Table 4. There were no differences (P >0.05) between the treatments during weeks one and two. However, in weeks three and five, the T2 group had a higher (P <0.05) body weight than the T1 group, while the body weights of the T3 and T4 groups did not differ (P >0.05). In week four, the T2, T3, and T4 groups all had higher body weights than the T1 group (P <0.05).
The effects of the dietary treatments on enteric microorganisms are presented in Figures 2, 3, and 4. The Kolmogorv-Sminov test was done to test for normality and P-values of 0.90, 0.930, and 0.838 were observed for the total coliform, E. coli, and Enterobacteriaceae counts, respectively, indicating that the distributions were normal.
Both the dietary treatments and the sampling day influenced (P <0.05) the total coliform counts in the calves' faecal samples. Coliform counts decreased over time in the T2, T3, and T4 groups, and the T2, T3, and T4 groups had lower counts than the control group (P <0.05). Coliform counts increased over time in the control group (P <0.05).
The dietary treatments also influenced the E. coli counts over time (P <0.05). A treatment χ time interaction was significant (P <0.05) for the T1 and T2 groups, with the E. coli count in T1 increasing from day three to day five and then decreasing from day five to day 10, and the E. coli count in T2 decreasing from day three to day five and then increasing from day five to day 10. In the calves supplemented with CACP (T3 and T4), the E. coli counts decreased over time (P <0.05). The change in E. coli counts from day five to day 10 in the T3 and T4 groups was not significant.
The faecal Enterobacteriaceae count decreased over time in the Lactobacillus and CACP-supplemented calves, but not in the control calves (P<0.05). Low Enterobacteriaceae populations were recorded for both the T3 and T4 calves (P <0.05). From day five to day 10, there were no significant changes (P >0.05) in the Enterobacteriaceae counts in the T3 and T4 groups; however, a marked change was observed in the T2 group (P <0.05).
Discussion
The prickly pear powder contained low concentrations of CP, fat, ADF, and ADL, but contained adequate DM, NDF, and calcium concentrations to support ruminant animal production (NRC, 2007). Similar results were reported by Ajith et al. (2017), and Pastorelli et al. (2022) demonstrated that cactus pear could be used as a substitute for pasture hay in ruminant diets without negative effects on production. The high ash and pectin contents of prickly pear could positively affect its utilisation as a livestock feed supplement (Pastorelli et al., 2022), by making it a good source of dietary fibre and phytochemicals (Morshedy et al., 2020). As reported by Medina et al. (2021), high-starch diets promote early ruminal microbiome development, and this could explain the effects of the dietary treatments on the growth and weaning weights of the calves. Abubakr et al. (2014) similarly postulated that dietary ingredients can boost microbial establishment and activity in calves, and consequently quicken the transition from a liquid to a solid diet, thereby hastening weaning. This may also be due to the decrease in pathogenic organisms that usually colonise the gastrointestinal epithelium of newborn calves (El-neney et al., 2019).
The DMI at 42 days of age in the current study was below the recommended value of 1.4 kg/day (Medina et al., 2021); however, the consumption of 0.9 kg of calf starter per day is recommended for rumen development prior to weaning (NRC, 2007). The dietary inclusion of prickly pear has been previously shown to increase the DMI and decrease the water intake (Pastorelli et al., 2022); our results differ from these reports, since neither CACP nor Lactobacillus supplementation had a significant effect on the average DMI. Nonetheless, a reduction in DMI has been previously reported for animals fed prickly pear (El-neney et al., 2019; Moula et al., 2019; Pastorelli et al., 2022). This could be attributed to its low CP and NDF contents, which are known to regulate DMI (Washaya et al., 2018; 2021). In other studies, supplementing calves with garlic powder (Kekana et al., 2020) and papaya seed powder (Makoya, 2018) improved calf DMI, as a result of improving gut health. These studies also reported a reduced pathogenic bacterial population. These improvements may be a result of specific properties or a combination of plant secondary metabolites, and similar conclusions could be drawn from the results of the current study.
The Lactobacillus and CACP treatment groups had lower FCR values than the control group, secondary to ADG and BW values that were higher than those of the control group. Similar results were reported by Pastorelli et al. (2022) and Zhan et al. (2017), and this was attributed to the phytochemical components, particularly flavonoids, in the mulberry leaf meal used in these studies. The effects of CACP on live weight have also been reported in other species (Moula et al., 2019; Salem et al., 2020). Higher ADG values in calves supplemented with Lactobacillus have been ascribed to an increased abundance of Bacteroidetes in the intestine (Jiang et al., 2020), which promoted nutrient absorption and thereby improved growth performance (Diao et al., 2019; La et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019). Alternatively, the differences in ADG could be related to differences in propionate and butyrate concentrations. Butyrate stimulates the development of the rumen mucosal papillae and epithelial cells (Beiranvand et al., 2014), and it is possible that there was a shift in fermentation dynamics as a result of the dietary supplements tested in this study. The effects of the flavonoids present in the CACP are not known; however, quercetin 3-methyl ether has been recognised as one of the most abundant flavonoids in prickly pear plants (El-mostafa et al., 2014), and could be responsible for the effects observed, as the effects of phytochemicals on calf growth have been previously reported (El-mostafa et al., 2014; Ali & Ali, 2017; Morshedy et al., 2020). Dietary flavonoids have been found to regulate the secretion of growth hormones (Miksicek, 1993) through the stimulation of the hypothalamus-pituitary hormone axis, thereby accelerating protein synthesis, and resulting in muscle tissue growth and body weight gain. We believe that the same mechanism could have been responsible for the differences in calf growth between the control and treatment groups in the current study, and further studies should be conducted to investigate this hypothesis.
The use of probiotics to regulate calf growth has been extensively studied (Frizzo et al., 2011; Cangiano et al., 2020; Kodithuwakku et al., 2021 ; Guo et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2022a); however, results have often been either inconsistent or contradictory (Wang et al, 2022a). Nonetheless, in this study, Lactobacillus supplementation increased the ADG and BW, at a lower DMI (at three weeks post-partum). This was possibly because the probiotics modified rumen fermentation patterns, and offset the normal proportions of volatile fatty acids in favour of butyrate production (Jiang et al., 2020). During this study, the calves' diet consisted of mainly milk and calf meal, and consequently, more butyrate than normal was produced. This may have played a pivotal role in stimulating the development of the rumen mucosa (Wang et al., 2022b). Besides modifying fermentation patterns, lactic acid bacteria are also known to trigger the immune system (Zhan et al., 2017), leading to antibody production. Our results confirm the effects of dietary Lactobacillus and CACP on enteric pathogenic bacteria counts. The improvement in calf growth in the current study could therefore be related to the beneficial effects of Lactobacillus and CACP on the production of digestive enzymes, the development of the rumen microbiome, and the modification of volatile fatty acid production (Wang et al., 2022b).
It is generally accepted that newborn animals are more susceptible to diseases, resulting in high morbidity and mortality rates in calves (Wang et al., 2022b). However, supplementation with probiotics has been found to reduce the relative risk of diarrhoea in calves (Wang et al., 2022a). This was achieved by increasing the levels of circulating immunoglobulins and macrophagic activity (Uyeno et al., 2015), and by competitively excluding enteric pathogens in the intestines. This results in a reduction in intestinal inflammation (Wang et al., 2022b), with a concomitant antioxidant effect. Additionally, the antibiotic effects of probiotics reduce the adherence of pathogens (Wang et al., 2022a). Lactic acid bacteria thus positively impact rumen development and intestinal health in calves, and thereby improve overall growth performance. This is achieved by stimulating the immune system, improving the intestinal microbial environment, and producing bacteriostatic effects against unfavourable microorganisms (Zhang et al., 2019; Jiang et al., 2020). These properties were possibly exhibited by CACP in the current study.
During the early stages of calf growth, calves should only consume milk, because solid food tends to bypass the undeveloped rumen, causing metabolic upsets. The neonatal calf is generally vulnerable to diseases, since they depend on passive immunity (Frizzo et al., 2011; Cangiano et al., 2020). It has been established that neonatal calves are more susceptible to E. coli colonisation, and are hence prone to diarrhoea within the first four days of life (Mohammed et al., 2019; Prieto et al., 2022). It was for this reason that we collected the faecal samples between three and 10 days post-partum. According to Young & Rood (2013), E. coli, Salmonella, and Clostridium perfringens types B, C, and D are the most important bacteria responsible for causing calf diarrhoea within the first few weeks of life. The results of the current study clearly show the effects of Lactobacillus and CACP supplementation on enteric pathogenic bacteria counts, and we therefore promote their use for better calf rearing in both extensive and intensive farming systems. The effects of CACP on faecal pathogens is attributed to its phytochemical properties, particularly its flavonoid content. Similar conclusions were drawn by Kekana et al. (2020) and Morshedy et al. (2020). The presence of dietary flavonoids has been previously found to reduce faecal pathogen counts (Bonelli et al., 2018; Formato et al., 2022), and both Lactobacillus and CACP supplementation lowered total coliform, E coli, and Enterobacteriaceae counts in this study.
The dietary supplementation of Lactobacillus and CACP may have inhibited the growth of adherent pathogenic intestinal microorganisms by lowering the intestinal pH (Jiang et al., 2020), and thereby reduced the incidence of diarrhoea. Colonisation by lactic acid bacteria has been previously found to optimise the pre-weaning intestinal microbiome in calves (Takino et al., 2017). In addition, Mengatto et al. (2015) found that feeding Lactobacillus decreased the relative abundance of faecal pathogenic bacteria, such as E. coli, Salmonella, Vibrio cholera, and Helicobacter pylori. Therefore, we propose that dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus and CACP has the ability to inhibit the growth of pathogenic microorganisms in the intestine, and thus decrease the incidence of intestinal diseases.
Conclusions
Dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus and CACP improved the ADG and weaning weight of dairy calves, and reduced the prevalence of faecal pathogens. Feeding 5.0 g CACP/day also reduced the faecal coliform, E. coli, and Enterobacteriaceae counts at five days post-partum.
Acknowledgments
Our sincere gratitude goes to the staff at the Animal Production unit of the Agricultural Research Council, South Africa, for their financial and technical support during the course of the study. The authors are also grateful to AgriSETA for their financial support.
Authors' contributions
MPM: conception, development of the original hypotheses, supervision, and results interpretation. SAS: collection of data, collaboration in interpretation of the results, and writing of the initial draft of the manuscript. WS: designing of the experiments, conducting the statistical analyses, and finalisation of the manuscript. MMC: collaboration in interpreting the results and supervision. All authors reviewed and approved the final version to be published.
Conflict of interest declaration
There is no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript.
References
Abubakr, A., Alimon, A.R., Yaakub, H., Abdullah, N., & Ivan, M., 2014. Effect of feeding palm oil by-products based diets on total bacteria, cellulolytic bacteria and methanogenic archaea in the rumen of goats. PLoS One, 9. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095713. [ Links ]
Ajith, K.S., Arpitha, R., Madhura, Y., Prabhu, T.M., Gloridoss, R.G., Narasimhamurthy, H.N., & Chandrapal S.K., 2017. Evaluation of spineless cactus (Opuntia ficus indica) as energy supplement in diets based on finger millet straw and maize grain by in vitro technique. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, ,Engineering and Technology, 6(6):10976-10982. DOI: 10.15680/IJIRSET.2017.0606149 [ Links ]
Albuquerque, I., Araújo, G., Santos, F., Carvalho, G., Santos, E., Nobre, I., Bezerra, L., Silva-Júnior, J., Silva-Filho, E., & Oliveira, R., 2020. Performance, body water balance, ingestive behavior and blood metabolites in goats fed with cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica L. Miller) silage subjected to an intermittent water supply. Sustainability, 12(7):2881. DOI: 10.3390/su12072881 [ Links ]
Ali, T. & Ali, M., 2017. Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of cactus (Opuntia ficus indica var. inermis). MSc thesis, Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Gezira, Sudan. [ Links ]
Beiranvand, H., Ghorbani, G.R., Khorvash, M., Nabipour, A., Dehghan-Banadaky, M., Homayouni, A., & Kargar, S., 2014. Interactions of alfalfa hay and sodium propionate on dairy calf performance and rumen development. Journal of Dairy Science, 97:2270-2280. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-6332 [ Links ]
Bonelli, F., Turini, L., Sarri, G., Serra, A., Buccioni, A., & Mele, M., 2018. Oral administration of chestnut tannins to reduce the duration of neonatal calf diarrhea. BMC Veterinary Research, 14:4-9. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-018- 1549-2. [ Links ]
Busanello, M., de Sousa, D.G., Mendonça, F.A.C., Daley, V.L., de Almeida, R., Bittar, C.M.M., & Lanna, D.P.D., 2021. Feed intake of growing dairy heifers raised under tropical conditions : A model evaluation using meta analysis. Animals, 11(11):3181. DOI: 10.3390/ani11113181 [ Links ]
Cangiano, L.R., Yohe, T.T., Steele, M.A., & Renaud, D.L., 2020. Invited review: Strategic use of microbial-based probiotics and prebiotics in dairy calf rearing. Applied Animal Science, 36:630-651. DOI: 10.15232/aas.2020-02049 [ Links ]
Casper, D.P., Hultquist, K.M., & Acharya, I.P., 2021. Lactobacillus plantarum GB LP-1 as a direct-fed microbial for neonatal calves. Journal of Dairy Science, 104:5557-5568. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2020-19438 [ Links ]
Daniel, L., Borges, A., Ribeiro, V., Junior, R., Monção, F.P., Soares, C., Reinaldo, J., Ruas, M., Vieira, F., Paulo, J., Rigueira, S., Costa, N.M., Lúcia, L., Oliveira, S., & Rabelo, W.D.O., 2019. Nutritional and productive parameters of Holstein/Zebu cows fed diets containing cactus pear. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 32:1373-1380. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.18.0584 [ Links ]
Davies, S.J., Esposito, G., Villot, C., Chevaux, E., & Raffrenato, E., 2022. An evaluation of nutritional and therapeutic factors affecting pre-weaned calf health and welfare, and direct-fed microbials as a potential alternative for promoting performance-a review. Dairy, 3:648-667. DOI: 10.3390/dairy3030045 [ Links ]
Diao, Q., Zhang, R., & Fu, T., 2019. Review of strategies to promote rumen development in calves. Animals, 9:490. DOI: 10.3390/ani9080490 [ Links ]
El-mostafa, K., Kharrassi, Y. El, Badreddine, A., Andreoletti, P., Vamecq, J., Saïd, M.H., Kebbaj, E., Latruffe, N., Lizard, G., Nasser, B., & Cherkaoui-malki, M., 2014. Nopal cactus (Opuntia ficus-ndica) as a source of bioactive compounds for nutrition, health and disease. Molecules, 19:14879-14901 DOI: 10.3390/molecules190914879 [ Links ]
El-neney, B.A.M., Gad, G.G., & Abdou, A., 2019. Effect of using prickly pear as a source of dietary feedstuffs on productive performance, physiological traits and immune response of rabbit. 2-prickly pear peels. Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds, 22:91-106. [ Links ]
Formato, M., Cimmino, G., Brahmi-Chendouh, N., Piccolella, S., & Pacifico, S., 2022. Polyphenols for livestock feed: sustainable perspectives for animal husbandry? Molecules, 27:7752. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27227752 [ Links ]
Frizzo, L.S., Zbrun, M.V., Soto, L.P., & Signorini, M.L., 2011. Effects of probiotics on growth performance in young calves: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 169:147-156. DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.06.009 [ Links ]
Grünwaldt, J.M., Guevara, J.C., & Grünwaldt, E.G., 2015. Review of scientific and technical bibliography on the use of Opuntia spp. as forage and its animal validation. Journal of the Professional Association for Cactus Development, 17:13-32. [ Links ]
Guo, Y., Li, Z., Deng, M., Li, Y., Liu, G., Liu, D., Liu, Q., Liu, Q., & Sun, B., 2022. Effects of a multi-strain probiotic on growth, health, and fecal bacterial flora of neonatal dairy calves. Animal Bioscience, 35:204-216. DOI:10.5713/ab.21.0084 [ Links ]
Jiang, X., Xu, H.J., Cui, Z.Q., & Zhang, Y.G., 2020. Effects of supplementation with Lactobacillus plantarum 299v on the performance, blood metabolites, rumen fermentation and bacterial communities of preweaning calves. Livestock Science, 239:104120. DOI:10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104120 [ Links ]
Kekana, T.W., Nherera-Chokuda, V.F., Baloyi, J.J., & Muya, C.M., 2020. Immunoglobulin G response and performance in Holstein calves supplemented with garlic powder and probiotics. South African Journal of Animal Science, 50:263-270. DOI: 10.4314/SAJAS.V50I2.9 [ Links ]
Kim, Y., Toji, N., Kizaki, K., Kushibiki, S., Ichijo, T., & Sato, S., 2022. Genetics of metabolic syndrome effects of dietary forage and calf starter on ruminal pH and transcriptomic adaptation of the rumen epithelium in Holstein calves during the weaning transition. Physiological Genomics, 48:803-809. DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00086.2016 [ Links ]
Kodithuwakku, K.A.H.T., Owada, H., Miura, H., Maruyama, D., Hirano, K., Suzuki, Y., Kobayashi, Y., & Koike, S., 2021. Effects of oral administration of timothy hay and psyllium on the growth performance and fecal microbiota of preweaning calves. Journal of Dairy Science, 104:12472-12485. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2021-20259 [ Links ]
La, S.K., Li, H., Wang, C., Liu, Q., Guo, G., Huo, W.J., Zhang, Y.L., Pei, C.X., & Zhang, S.L., 2019. Effects of rumen-protected folic acid and dietary protein level on growth performance, ruminal fermentation, nutrient digestibility and hepatic gene expression of dairy calves. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 103:1006-1014. DOI: 10.1111/jpn.13109 [ Links ]
Marandure, T., 2016. Concepts and key issues of ethnoveterinary medicine in Africa: A review of its application in Zimbabwe. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 11(20):1836-1841. DOI: 10.5897/AJAR2014.8827. [ Links ]
Medina, C.E.G., Gómez, P.L., Méndez. J.J.M., Valdez, O.D.M., Gutierrez, J.A.R., & Coss, A.L.D., 2021. Beneficial effects of a calf starter versus forage on rumen development and bacteria populations in beef calves. Ciência Rural, 51(5):1-11. DOI: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20200562 [ Links ]
Mengatto, C.M., Marchini, L., Bernardes, L.A. de S., Gomes, S.C., Silva, A.M., & Rizzatti-Barbosa, C.M., 2015. Partial denture metal framework may harbor potentially pathogenic bacteria. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 7(6):468-474. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2015.7.6.468 [ Links ]
Mohammed, S.A.E.M., Marouf, S.A.E.M., Erfana, A.M., El-Jakee, J.K.A.E.H., Hessain, A.M., Dawoud, T.M., Kabli, S.A., & Moussa, I.M., 2019. Risk factors associated with E. coli causing neonatal calf diarrhea. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 26:1084-1088. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.07.008 [ Links ]
Morshedy, S.A., Basyony, M., Almeer, R., & Daim, M.A., 2020. Effect of prickly pear cactus peel supplementation on milk production, nutrient digestibility and rumen fermentation of sheep and the maternal effects on growth and physiological performance of suckling offspring. Animals, 10:1476. DOI: 10.3390/ani10091476 [ Links ]
Moula, N., Humbel, M., Leterrier, M., Lempereur, L., Touazi, L., Saidj, D., & Hornick, J., 2019. Effects of Opuntia ficus-indica on growth performance and serum parameters of broiler chicken in Algeria. Tropicultura, 37:1-11. DOI: 10.25518/2295-8010.263 [ Links ]
Oliveira, A.S. & Ferreira, V.B., 2016. Prediction of intake in growing dairy heifers under tropical conditions. Journal of Dairy Science, 99:1103-1110. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-9638 [ Links ]
Owusu, E., Ahorlu, M.M., Afutu, E., Akumwena, A., & Asare, G.A., 2021. Antimicrobial activity of selected medicinal plants from a sub-Saharan African country against bacterial pathogens from post-operative wound infections. Medical Sciences, 9:23. DOI: 10.3390/medsci9020023 [ Links ]
Prieto, A., Cynthia, L., Pablo, D., Manuel, D., Gonzalo, L., Ant, C., Remesar, S., Garc, D., Ceferino, L., Panadero, R., Pablo, D., Morrondo, P., & Fern, G., 2022. Antimicrobial susceptibility of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli from diarrhoeic neonatal calves in Spain. Animals, 12(3):264. DOI: 10.3390/ani12030264 [ Links ]
Pastorelli, G., Serra, V., Vannuccini, C., & Attard, E., 2022. Opuntia spp. as alternative fodder for sustainable livestock production. Animals, 12:1597. DOI: 10.3390/ani12131597 2022 [ Links ]
Salem, I.B.E.N., Khnissi, S., Rekik, M., Younes, A.B.E.N., & Lassoued, N., 2020. Effect of supplementation by cactus (Opuntia ficus indica f. inermis) cladodes on reproductive response and some blood metabolites of female goat on pre-mating phase. Journal of New Sciences, 63:3956-3964. [ Links ]
Scott, K., Kelton, D.F., Duffield, T.F., & Renaud, D.L., 2019. Risk factors identified on arrival associated with morbidity and mortality at a grain-fed veal facility: A prospective, single-cohort study. Journal of Dairy Science, 102:9224-9235. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-16829 [ Links ]
Takino, T., Kato-Mori, Y., Motooka, D., Nakamura, S., Iida, T., & Hagiwara, K., 2017. Postnatal changes in the relative abundance of intestinal Lactobacillus spp. in newborn calves. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 79:452-455. DOI: 10.1292/jvms.16-0406 [ Links ]
Thomas, B.L., Guadagnin, A.R., & Cardoso, F.C., 2022. Feeding rumen-protected lysine to dairy cows prepartum improves performance and health of their calves. Journal of Dairy Science, 105:2256-2274. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2021-20545 [ Links ]
Urie, N.J., Lombard, J.E., Shivley, C.B., Kopral, C.A., Adams, A.E., Earleywine, T.J., Olson, J.D., & Garry, F.B., 2018. Preweaned heifer management on US dairy operations: Part V. Factors associated with morbidity and mortality in preweaned dairy heifer calves. Journal of Dairy Science, 101:9229-9244. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-14019 [ Links ]
Uyeno, Y., Shigemori, S., & Shimosato, T., 2015. Effect of probiotics/prebiotics on cattle health and productivity. Microbes and Environments, 30:126-132. DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.ME14176 [ Links ]
Wang, L., Sun , H., Gao, H., Xia, Y., Zan, L., & Zhao, C., 2022a. The effects of probiotics on the performance of pre-weaning dairy calves. PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1722603/v1 [ Links ]
Wang, Y., An, M., Zhang, Z., Zhang, W., Kulyar, M.F.-A., Iqbal, M., He, Y., Li, F., An, T., Li, H., Luo, X., Yang, S., & Li, J., 2022b. Effects of milk replacer-based Lactobacillus on growth and gut development of yaks' calves: a gut microbiome and metabolic study. Microbiology Spectrum, 10(4):e01155-22. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01155-22. [ Links ]
Washaya, S., Mupangwa, J., & Muchenje, V., 2018. Chemical composition of Lablab purpureus and Vigna unguiculata and their subsequent effects on methane production in Xhosa lop-eared goats. South African Journal of Animal Science, 48:446-458. DOI: 10.4314/sajas.v48i3.5 [ Links ]
Washaya, S., Mupangwa, J., & Muchenje V., 2021. Effect of legume hay supplementation on feed intake, growth and in-vivo digestibility and volatile fatty acid production of Xhosa goats. Welwitschia International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3:1-12. [ Links ]
Yáñez, M.I.A., Mendo, O.H., Legarreta, I.G., & Bribiesca, J.E.R., 2011. Productive response of lambs fed with fresh or dehydrated spineless cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica L.). Journal of the Professional Association for Cactus Development, 13:23-35. [ Links ]
Young, A. & Rood, K.A., 2013. Management of young calves for the small scale hobbiest. Utah State University Extension. Available from: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/extension_curall/360. [ Links ]
Zeeman, D.C., 2005. Evaluation of sun-dried Opuntia ficus-indica var. Algerian cladodes in sheep diets. MSc thesis, Department of Animal, Wildlife and Grassland Sciences, University of the Free State, South Africa. [ Links ]
Zhang, Z., Lianb, X., Lia, S., & Stringer, J. L. 2009. Characterization of chemical ingredients and anticonvulsant activity of American skullcap (Scutellaria lateriflora). Phytomedicine,16(5):485-493. DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2008.07.011 [ Links ]
Zhan, J., Liu, M., Su, X., Zhan, K., Zhang, C., & Zhao, G., 2017. Effects of alfalfa flavonoids on the production performance, immune system, and ruminal fermentation of dairy cows. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 30:1416-1424. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.16.0579 [ Links ]
Zhang, L., Jiang, X., Liu, X., Zhao, X., Liu, S., Li, Y., & Zhang, Y., 2019. Growth, health, rumen fermentation, and bacterial community of holstein calves fed Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG during the preweaning stage. Journal of Animal Science, 97:2598-2608. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz126 [ Links ]
Submitted 25 January 2023
Accepted 25 October 2024
Published May 2025
# Corresponding author: washayas@gzu.ac.zw












