SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.115 número4Prevention of COVID-19 in the workplace índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

    Links relacionados

    • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
    • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

    Compartir


    SAMJ: South African Medical Journal

    versión On-line ISSN 2078-5135versión impresa ISSN 0256-9574

    SAMJ, S. Afr. med. j. vol.115 no.4 Pretoria may. 2025

    https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2025.v115i4.3148 

    CORRESPONDENCE

     

    Spinal mobilisation and manipulation for paediatric populations

     

     

    To the Editor: Spinal manipulation of infants and children is a global concern. The International Federation of Manual and Musculoskeletal Physical Therapists (IFOMPT) and the International Organisation of Physiotherapists in Paediatrics (IOPTP) started a task force in 2020 to develop a position statement on the safe and effective use of manipulation and mobilisation in the paediatric population. We used a three-step guideline process including literature reviews, a Delphi study of experts in the field and an evidence-to-decision analysis.

    Initially, we set out to determine the existing evidence on the effectiveness and harms of spinal manipulation and mobilisation in the paediatric population.[1] We conducted two systematic reviews on the psychometric properties of the outcome measures identified in the scoping review.[2,3] A three-round Delphi survey of international physiotherapy experts was conducted to establish consensus regarding the use of spinal manipulation and mobilisation among infants, children and adolescents.[4] Using the information gathered, a refinement stage (evidence-to-decision summative analysis, position statement development, evidence gap map analyses and multilayer review processes) led to the development of a position statement on the use of spinal manipulation and mobilisation in paediatric populations.[5]

    Our recommendations follow:

    1. It is not recommended to perform:

    spinal manipulation and mobilisation on infants;

    cervical and lumbar spine manipulation on children;

    spinal manipulation and mobilisation on infants, children and adolescents for non-musculoskeletal paediatric conditions including asthma, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, breastfeeding difficulties, cerebral palsy, infantile colic, nocturnal enuresis and otitis media.

    2. It may be appropriate to treat musculoskeletal conditions, including spinal mobility impairments associated with neck-back pain and neck pain with headache, utilising:

    spinal mobilisation and manipulation on adolescents;

    spinal mobilisation on children; or

    thoracic manipulation on children for neck-back pain only.

    3. No high-certainty evidence to recommend these interventions was available.

    Reports of mild to severe harm exist; however, risk rates could not be determined.

    The task force further recommends that it is time to stop attempting to treat infants and non-musculoskeletal paediatric conditions with spinal manipulation and mobilisation. Instead, resources should be directed toward the development of quality clinical trials to support evidence-based clinical pathways to effectively treat children and adolescents with musculoskeletal spinal impairments and pain. Additionally, the task force would propose mandatory tracking of adverse events when utilising spinal mobilisation and manipulation to fully understand the risk involved.

    A Basson

    Physiotherapy Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

    bassonannalie@gmail.com

    Task force members: A R Gross, K A Olson, N Milne, J Pool, A Basson, D Clewley, J L Dice

     

    References

    1. Milne N, Longeri L, Patel A, et al. Spinal manipulation and mobilisation in the treatment of infants, children, and adolescents: A systematic scoping review. BMC Pediat 2022;22(1):721. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03781-6        [ Links ]

    2. Hayton T, Gross A, Basson A, et al. Psychometric measurement properties of patient-reported and observer-reported outcome measures for spinal mobilisations and manipulation on paediatric subjects with diverse medical conditions: A systematic review. J Manual Manipul Ther 2024;32(3):234-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2023.2281650        [ Links ]

    3. Hayton T, Gross A, Basson A, et al. Psychometric properties of clinician-reported and performance-based outcomes cited in a scoping review on spinal manipulation and mobilization for pediatric populations with diverse medical conditions: A systematic review. J Manual Manipul Ther 2024;32(3):255-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2023.2269038        [ Links ]

    4. Dice JL, Brismée JM, Froment FP, et al. Spinal manipulation and mobilisation among infants, children, and adolescents: An international Delphi survey of expert physiotherapists. J Manual Manipul Ther 2024;32(3):284-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2024.2327782        [ Links ]

    5. Gross AR, Olson K, Pool J, et al. Spinal manipulation and mobilisation in paediatrics - an international evidence-based position statement for physiotherapists. J Manual Manipul Ther 2024;32(3):211-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2024.2332026        [ Links ]