SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.8 número1 índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

    Links relacionados

    • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
    • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

    Compartilhar


    Wits Journal of Clinical Medicine

    versão On-line ISSN 2618-0197versão impressa ISSN 2618-0189

    Resumo

    MAKINS, Nicholas A et al. The cost-benefit of utilizing post-dialysis haemoglobin for dosing of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent therapy in patients with anaemia on haemodialysis in a low-resource setting. WJCM [online]. 2026, vol.8, n.1, pp.1-6. ISSN 2618-0197.  https://doi.org/10.18772/26180197.2026.v8n1a1.

    BACKGROUND: Access to dialysis in South Africa is limited by budgetary constraints. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are used to manage anaemia in dialysis patients but are significant cost drivers. We aimed to evaluate haemoglobin and weight variation during dialysis and to assess whether using post-dialysis haemoglobin rather than pre-dialysis haemoglobin was associated with ESA dose reduction and cost benefit METHODS: In this single-centre cross-sectional study, haemoglobin and weight differences before and after a 4-hour midweek maintenance haemodialysis session were compared. The ESA doses required to maintain haemoglobin levels within the recommended range of 10 - 11.5g/dL were calculated based on the pre- and post-dialysis haemoglobin results, and the difference was used to determine the cost benefit RESULTS: Fifty-five patients on chronic haemodialysis at a tertiary hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa, were enrolled. The mean post-dialysis haemoglobin was higher than pre-dialysis haemoglobin (11.34±1.75 vs 10.92±1.45g/dL, p=0.003), representing a 3.95% mean haemoglobin increase. The mean intradialytic weight reduction was 3.32±1.68%, p<0.0001. The calculated median ESA dose based on post-dialysis haemoglobin was significantly lower than the ESA dose based on the pre-dialysis haemoglobin (6,000 (IQR 0-12 0000) vs 8,000 (IQR 4,000-12,000) IU/week, p<0.0001). The difference in ESA dose translated into a mean cost saving of 21.38% CONCLUSION: In an environment where dialysis access is limited by resource constraints, ESA dosing based on post-dialysis haemoglobin concentrations may translate into significant cost savings. Larger studies are required to validate this approach and assess long-term patient outcomes

    Palavras-chave : Anaemia; chronic haemodialysis; post-dialysis haemoglobin; erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.

            · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )