SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.81 número1 índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

    Links relacionados

    • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
    • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

    Compartilhar


    South African Journal of Physiotherapy

    versão On-line ISSN 2410-8219versão impressa ISSN 0379-6175

    Resumo

    BURGER, Marlette; JORDAAN, Esme R.  e  NIEHAUS, Dana. Early gross motor development: Agreement between the AIMS and the BSID-III. SAJPHYS [online]. 2025, vol.81, n.1, pp.1-7. ISSN 2410-8219.  https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v81i1.2168.

    BACKGROUND: Early gross motor development is a crucial indicator of overall neurodevelopment. In low- and middle-income countries, lack of accessible assessment tools poses challenges for healthcare professionals evaluating infant neurodevelopment OBJECTIVES: To determine the agreement between the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) and Bayley Scales of Infant Development-III (BSID-III) gross motor domain at 6 months and to evaluate the predictive validity of the AIMS at 6 months for identifying severe gross motor delays at 18 months METHOD: This nested subgroup study assessed 112 full-term infants using both AIMS and BSID-III at 6 months and BSID-III at 18 months. Agreement between measures was determined using Bland-Altman plots, while predictive validity was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with various cut-off scores RESULTS: Bland-Altman analysis showed strong agreement between AIMS and BSID-III in the lower-performance range, with bias only in scores above 33. The traditional 10th percentile AIMS cut-off had low sensitivity (27.3%) but high specificity (98%) for predicting delays at 18 months. A modified 23rd percentile cut-off improved sensitivity to 63.6% while maintaining acceptable specificity (81.6%), with a 95.2% negative predictive value (NPV CONCLUSION: The AIMS demonstrates strong agreement with BSID-III when identifying potential developmental delays. The proposed 23rd percentile cut-off offers a more balanced screening threshold for this population CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The AIMS presents a viable alternative to the BSID-III for initial screening in resource-limited settings. The high NPV at the 23rd percentile cut-off makes it useful for ruling out developmental delays

    Palavras-chave : infants; gross motor development; Alberta Infant Motor Scale; Bayley Scales of Infant Development-III; predictive validity.

            · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )