SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.47 issue1Foreign nurse educators' lived experiences of incivility: The case for Botswana author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

    Related links

    • On index processCited by Google
    • On index processSimilars in Google

    Share


    Curationis

    On-line version ISSN 2223-6279Print version ISSN 0379-8577

    Abstract

    MPHENG, Ontlotlile I.; SEHULARO, Leepile A.; MOAGI, Miriam M.  and  KOVANE, Gaotswake P.. Mental Health Review Board Members' understanding of the policy guideline on 72-hour assessment. Curationis [online]. 2024, vol.47, n.1, pp.1-10. ISSN 2223-6279.  https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v47i1.2662.

    BACKGROUND: The Mental Health Care Act (No 17 of 2002) promotes the involvement of Mental Health Review Board (MHRB) members in the oversight, execution and evaluation of assessments and admissions of individuals in accordance with the 72-h policy guidelines. However, the MHRB experiences dissatisfaction with the implementation of policy guidelines on 72-h assessment of involuntary Mental Health Care Users (MHCUs). OBJECTIVES: This study explores and describes the MHRB members' understanding of the policy guidelines on 72-h assessment of involuntary MHCUs in South Africa. METHOD: A qualitative exploratory, descriptive and contextual research design was used. Data were collected using Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) from MHRB from three provinces of South Africa, namely North West, Northern Cape and Gauteng. Three FGDs involving a total of 13 participants were conducted. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the data, namely: MHRBs' understanding of the policy guideline on 72-h assessment of involuntary MHCUs, MHRBs' challenges with the policy guideline on 72-h assessment of involuntary MHCUs and MHRBs' recommendations to strengthen the implementation of policy guideline on 72-h assessment of involuntary MHCUs. CONCLUSION: Certain issues regarding dissatisfaction related to improper implementation of the 72-h policy guideline persist. Therefore, MHRB recommends that there should be skilled Mental Health Care Practitioners, adequate infrastructure, community involvement, and family and stakeholder collaboration to improve care towards the involuntary MHCUs. CONTRIBUTION: The study illustrated there is a need to strengthen the implementation of 72-h assessment of involuntary MHCUs through ensuring enough human resources, designated facilities and involvement of the community as raised by the MHRBs.

    Keywords : 72-h involuntary assessment; guideline; mental health; Mental Health Review Board; policy guidelines.

            · text in English     · English ( pdf )