SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.29 número1Macroeconomic implications of uncertainty in South AfricaA systematic literature review of the implementation and evaluation of the JOBS programme: A suggested framework for South Africa índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

    Links relacionados

    • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
    • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

    Compartir


    South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences

    versión On-line ISSN 2222-3436versión impresa ISSN 1015-8812

    Resumen

    RAM, Asheer J.  y  VAN ZIJL, Wayne. Examining different artificial intelligence models' ability to pass Certificate of Theory in Accountancy-level tax questions. S. Afr. j. econ. manag. sci. [online]. 2026, vol.29, n.1, pp.1-6. ISSN 2222-3436.  https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v29i1.6348.

    As Artificial Intelligence (AI) models become more sophisticated and entrenched in accountancy professions, this raises questions about their ability to outperform humans. This article is one of the first to examine the ability of five different AI models to pass professional tax examinations. CONTRIBUTION: This article provides evidence about AI's current ability to support or replace tax practitioners. It provides a baseline to track the progress of different AI models as they evolve. Only Grok passed, while ChatGPT, Claude, CoPilot, and Gemini failed. Notably, the AI models provided persuasive answers despite being incorrect, negating their ability to replace tax practitioners

    Palabras clave : artificial intelligence; education; ChatGPT; Claude; Copilot; Gemini; Grok; taxation.

            · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )