SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.28The implications of the decision in Helen Suzman Foundation v Judicial Service Commission 2018 (7) BCLR 763 (CC) 8 on the functioning of the South African Judicial Service CommissionSouth African municipalities in financial distress: what can be done? índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

    Links relacionados

    • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
    • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

    Compartir


    Law, Democracy and Development

    versión On-line ISSN 2077-4907versión impresa ISSN 1028-1053

    Resumen

    NCAMANE, Ntando. An analysis of informal workers and the coverage of South Africa's Covid-19 Temporary Employee/Employer Relief Scheme (TERS). Law democr. Dev. [online]. 2024, vol.28, pp.288-311. ISSN 2077-4907.  https://doi.org/10.17159/2077-4907/2024/ldd.v28.13.

    The Covid-19 pandemic required states worldwide to take action to contain it and, as part of this effort, adopt measures to mitigate its socio-economic impacts. In South Africa, these measures include the enactment of lockdown regulations in terms of the Disaster Management Act 53 of 2005. This article focuses on one of the measures, namely the Covid-19 Temporary Employee/Employer Relief Scheme (TERS), a system created in terms of the Unemployment Insurance Act 63 of 2001. TERS aimed to provide support to employers who were in distress at the height of the pandemic and unable to pay their employees. TERS falls under the scope of social security law because it is a measure that finds expression under the unemployment insurance system, which is an element of social insurance. This article argues, however, that temporary schemes such as TERS provide no solution to the long-standing problems of the unemployment insurance system and perpetuate its exclusionary practice of not covering informal workers. This is evident in the definitions of an employee and contributor in terms of the Unemployment Insurance Act (UIA). The two definitions lean towards offering coverage to workers in formal employment but not to informal workers. This leaves such workers destitute and vulnerable, as they have no protection; for instance, they became on furlough owing to the effects of Covid-19. This article proposes that the UIA's definition of employees be amended to include informal workers and thereby afford them unemployment protection as well.

    Palabras clave : informal workers; Covid-19; Unemployment Insurance Act 63 of 2001; Unemployment Insurance Contributions Act 4 of 2002; Unemployment Insurance Fund; Temporary Employee/Employer Relief Scheme.

            · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )