SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.19 issue1A descriptive study of children with cerebral palsy at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic HospitalPatterns of healthcare utilisation and barriers affecting access to child healthcare services in low-income urban South African settings author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

    Related links

    • On index processCited by Google
    • On index processSimilars in Google

    Share


    South African Journal of Child Health

    On-line version ISSN 1999-7671Print version ISSN 1994-3032

    Abstract

    BELAY, F; HORN, A  and  PILLAY, S. Quality of neonatal cranial ultrasound interpretation among paediatric and neonatal trainees in the West Metro of Cape Town: A clinical survey. S. Afr. j. child health [online]. 2025, vol.19, n.1, pp.2-7. ISSN 1999-7671.  https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCH.2025.v19i2.2626.

    BACKGROUND: Cranial ultrasound (cUS) is a recommended skill for paediatric and neonatal trainees in South Africa, but there are no national or regional guidelines for training OBJECTIVES: To survey cUS training and knowledge among paediatric and neonatal trainees working in tertiary and regional neonatal units in the West Metro area of Cape Town METHODS: Trainees who had worked at least 1 month in neonatology on the University of Cape Town training platform were sent an online survey RESULTS: Thirty-one paediatric registrars and five neonatal senior registrars were sent the survey. Responses were received from 26 of the 36 trainees (72%). None had attended a formal cUS course, 18 (69%) had attended a lecture from a neonatologist, and 8 (30%) had attended a formal consultant tutorial. Ten (38%) trainees received initial training from registrars, medical officers, or self-study. Most trainees stated the cUS report should describe anatomy (92%), haemorrhage (81%) and ventricular size (65%). Knowledge of other reporting and procedural aspects varied from 4% to 50%. Correct identification of the major features of images ranged from 12% to 92% but was below 40% in most questions. Trainees with >24 months experience were more likely to correctly identify a normal scan (58% v. 14%; p=0.038) and less likely to assign abnormal prognosis (0% v. 43%; p=0.017 CONCLUSIONS: There was inadequate and variable cUS training and competency in paediatric and neonatal trainees in our institution. A national standardised programme for training and accreditation of clinician-performed neonatal cUS will address this

    Keywords : Neonate; newborn; diagnostic imaging; ultrasonography; cranial.

            · text in English     · English ( pdf )