SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.45 número3Mental illness, harassment and labour laws: some thoughts on harassment by employees suffering from mental illnessThe international labour organisation in pursuit of decent work in Southern Africa: an appraisal índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

    Links relacionados

    • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
    • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

    Compartir


    Obiter

    versión On-line ISSN 2709-555Xversión impresa ISSN 1682-5853

    Resumen

    PHUNGULA, Simphiwe P. The effect of business rescue's moratorium on property belonging to the company or in its lawful possession and third-party contracts. Obiter [online]. 2024, vol.45, n.3, pp.635-648. ISSN 2709-555X.

    The rights of both company and property owner have been a burning issue when a company embarks on business rescue proceedings. This issue has been plagued by difficulties with the interpretation of "moratorium" as found in section 133(1) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008. Property owners who have concluded contracts of lease or instalment sale with a company constantly find themselves in difficult positions when the company commences business rescue proceedings. These difficulties include, inter alia, the business rescue practitioner's cancelling of agreements between the property owner and the company, and the associated procedure; the failure of the company to pay in accordance with the agreements and the property owners' recourse/cause of action; and the effect of a moratorium on those properties. This article therefore deals with the competing legal and commercial interests, including rights, of both company and property owners when a company has commenced business rescue proceedings.

            · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )