SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.44 issue2Does the prevention of illegal eviction from and unlawful occupation of land act of 1998 provide adequate family home protection to insolvent debtors or is it still pie in the sky? (Part 1)Reconciling customary law and cultural practices with human rights in Uganda author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

    Related links

    • On index processCited by Google
    • On index processSimilars in Google

    Share


    Obiter

    On-line version ISSN 2709-555XPrint version ISSN 1682-5853

    Abstract

    BOUWERS, Garth J. Tacit choice of law in international commercial contracts: progress or stagnation in the common-law jurisdictions?. Obiter [online]. 2023, vol.44, n.2, pp.271-307. ISSN 2709-555X.

    The English common-law rules of private international law have, to a large extent, been replaced by European conflicts-law regulations in the United Kingdom (UK). Nevertheless, English common law remains highly influential in numerous jurisdictions. In many legal systems, the private-international-law rules are based fundamentally on the common-law rules developed by English courts. This is problematic since the common-law rules of private international law may be outdated. This article examines the English common-law choice-of-law rules - more specifically, the rules and principles concerning the determination of a tacit choice of law in international commercial contracts. The traditional common-law position is compared to selected common-law jurisdictions - namely, Australia, Canada, India, Israel and New Zealand. Finally, the article highlights the progress (or lack thereof) in the aforementioned common-law jurisdictions in addressing the issues related to the determination of a tacit choice of law in international commercial contracts.

            · text in English     · English ( pdf )