SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.35 issue1Revisiting electric utilities' efficiency in the Southern African Power Pool, 1998-2009Passive cooling for thermal comfort in informal housing author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

    Related links

    • On index processCited by Google
    • On index processSimilars in Google

    Share


    Journal of Energy in Southern Africa

    On-line version ISSN 2413-3051Print version ISSN 1021-447X

    Abstract

    MAPOSA, Daniel; MASACHE, Amon; MDLONGWA, Precious  and  SIGAUKE, Caston. An evaluation of variable selection methods using Southern Africa solar irradiation data. J. energy South. Afr. [online]. 2024, vol.35, n.1, pp.1-23. ISSN 2413-3051.  https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3051/2024/v35i1a16336.

    Dimensionality poses a challenge in developing quality predictive models. Often when modelling solar irra-diance (SI), many covariates are considered. Training such data has several disadvantages. This study sought to identify the best variable embedded selection method for different location and time horizon combinations from Southern Africa solar irradiance data. It introduced new variable selection methods into solar irradiation studies, namely penalised quantile regression (PQR), regularised random forests (RRF), and quantile regression forest (QRF). Stability analysis, performance and accuracy metric evaluations were used to compare them with the common lasso, elastic and ridge regression methods. The QRF model performed best in all locations followed by the shrinkage methods on hourly data. However, it was found that QRF is not sensitive to associations through correlations, thereby ignoring the relevance of variables while focusing on importance. Among the shrinkage methods, the lasso performed best in only one location. On the 24-hour horizon, elastic net dominated the performances among the shrinkage methods, but QRF was best in three locations of the six considered. Results confirmed that variable selection methods performed differently on different situational data sets. Depending on the strengths of the methods, results were combined to identify the most paramount variables. Day, total rainfall, and wind direction were superfluous features in all situations. The study concluded that shrinkage methods are best in cases of extreme multicollinearity, while QRF is best on data sets with outliers or/and heavy tails.

    Keywords : multicollinearity; quantile regression; relevance; random forests; shrinkage methods; variable selection.

            · text in English     · English ( pdf )