SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.55 número3Use of phosphatidylcholine in Tris-based extender with or without egg yolk to freeze Bapedi ram semenIncorporating oldman saltbush hay and prickly pear in diets for red Sindhi calves índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

    Links relacionados

    • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
    • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

    Compartilhar


    South African Journal of Animal Science

    versão On-line ISSN 2221-4062versão impressa ISSN 0375-1589

    Resumo

    TEUBES, M.; SCHOLTZ, A.J.; DZAMA, K.  e  CLOETE, S.W.P.. Lamb behaviour during and shortly after tail-docking. S. Afr. j. anim. sci. [online]. 2025, vol.55, n.3, pp.146-153. ISSN 2221-4062.  https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v55i3.06.

    Routine husbandry procedures for lambs are increasingly scrutinised for their animal welfare implications. One such procedure is tail-docking, which is commonly performed to prevent breech blowfly strike. Although tail-docking is considered painful for lambs, the precise level of pain remains unquantified. While proponents argue that the long-term benefits outweigh the temporary pain caused; further investigations into the welfare implications of tail-docking are needed. This study assessed Merino lambs at an average docking age of 14 ± 3 days across five cohorts, each comprising 25-35 ewes and their lambs (n = 228). Two treatments were administered: the Control group lambs were left intact and undocked, while the Treatment group lambs were tail-docked. Lambs were randomly assigned to either group, with birth type and sex as stratifying factors. Observational data were collected during three periods: 1. during the tail-docking/sham procedure following the established protocol; 2. during a two-minute period immediately post-docking, upon returning to their dams; and 3. during a two-minute period 10 minutes post-docking. Signs of discomfort were evident during tail-docking and persisted at two and 10 minutes post-procedure. During the docking/sham procedure, undocked lambs were more likely to remain calm, whereas docked lambs exhibited signs of distress, including restlessness, kicking, bleating, and tense facial expressions. Observations at two minutes post-docking aligned with those recorded at 10 minutes post-docking, indicating sustained discomfort. These findings suggest that tail-docking results in both immediate and longer-term discomfort. Further research should assess whether the long-term benefits of tail-docking justify the associated pain.

    Palavras-chave : discomfort; ethical production; ovine; pain; welfare.

            · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )