SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.47 número1Determination and comparison of digestion kinetics of two fibre sources in geese (Anseris) índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

    Links relacionados

    • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
    • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

    Compartir


    South African Journal of Animal Science

    versión On-line ISSN 2221-4062versión impresa ISSN 0375-1589

    Resumen

    BUSANELLO, M. et al. In situ ruminal degradability of protein feeds with distinct physical forms: a metaanalysis. S. Afr. j. anim. sci. [online]. 2017, vol.47, n.1, pp.91-95. ISSN 2221-4062.  https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v47i1.13.

    In ruminant livestock, rumen undegradable protein (RUP) derived from the diet and microbial protein synthesized in the rumen are essential for animal survival, maintenance, growth, production, and reproduction. RUP is influenced by diet composition, physical form, and ruminal metabolism. Here, we aimed to evaluate the ruminal degradability of protein feeds with different physical forms (meal versus grain) through a meta-analysis study. A database, composed of 45 treatments from 12 studies carried out in Brazil, was evaluated to compare the degradability of soybean, sunflower, canola, and flaxseed grains with the meal forms of soybean, peanut, sunflower, cottonseed, and corn gluten. The degradation parameters of dry matter did not differ significantly between meals and grains. However, the effective degradability of crude protein at a passage rate of 2% per hour was higher in meals than in grains. Overall, it was concluded that meal protein might be more degradable in the rumen of animals on an energy intake lower than the maintenance.

    Palabras clave : Concentrated feed; metabolism; passage rate; processing; ruminants.

            · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )