SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.63 issue1King Kong adapatations (1959-2017): Transversing culture and society"Realness" in images: The adaptation of verbatim text to stage images with specific reference to tot stof | tot stilte - 'n paniekreaksie (2018) author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

    Related links

    • On index processCited by Google
    • On index processSimilars in Google

    Share


    Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe

    On-line version ISSN 2224-7912Print version ISSN 0041-4751

    Abstract

    MEINTJES, Zanétte. Hedging: The occurrence and use of restriction and restraint markers in students' argumentative texts. Tydskr. geesteswet. [online]. 2023, vol.63, n.1, pp.65-82. ISSN 2224-7912.  https://doi.org/10.17159/2224-7912/2023/v63n1a4.

    Metadiscourse is divided into two categories, namely textual and interpersonal metadiscourse. Textual metadiscourse involves the use of words and phrases to organise textual information in a coherent way, while interpersonal metadiscourse enables the author to establish a writer-reader relationship. Hedges that form part of the interpersonal metadiscourse category are specifically used to qualify author positions. First, hedging softens author points of view to a possibility, thus creating space for the reader's opinion regarding the topic of discussion. Secondly, it shows when a writer distances himself/herself from the views therein and/or even the evaluation thereof. The literature is characterised by various studies regarding the use of hedging in academic texts, but there is a gap with respect to its use specifically in Afrikaans-speaking first-year students' written texts. This article sheds light on the type of hedges used by these students; the frequency in use of hedges over all three parts of the texts, namely the introduction, the body (content part) and the conclusion; whether the hedges are used correctly and appropriately; and whether there is a significant difference in the use of hedges between students who received below-average, average and above-average marks for their written arguments. The results of this investigation show that Afrikaans-speaking first-year students at the start of their university careers are not necessarily experienced in the use of hedging. Restriction and restraint markers rarely figured in the arguments. Therefore, it is recommended that Afrikaans-speaking first-year students at university should be acculturated in Academic literacy modules in the importance and use of hedging in their written arguments.

    Keywords : metadiscourse; textual metadiscourse; interpersonal metadiscourse; Afrikaans-speaking first-year students; written arguments; hedging; restriction markers; restraint markers.

            · abstract in Afrikaans     · text in Afrikaans     · Afrikaans ( pdf )