SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.31 issue1Dialectics between reader and text: A discussion on hermeneutical homileticsCreative preaching: The importance of creativity in the preaching process author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

    Related links

    • On index processCited by Google
    • On index processSimilars in Google

    Share


    Verbum et Ecclesia

    On-line version ISSN 2074-7705Print version ISSN 1609-9982

    Verbum Eccles. (Online) vol.31 n.1 Pretoria  2010

    https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v31i1.403 

    ORIGINAL RESEARCH

     

    How 'religious' is religion and how 'natural' is naturalness? On the question of the naturalness of religion

     

     

    Daniël P. Veldsman

    Department of Dogmatics and Christian Ethics, University of Pretoria, South Africa

    Correspondence

     

     


    ABSTRACT

    The problem addressed in this article is twofold: firstly, how can a question be posed (on the naturalness of religion) consisting of two concepts (naturalness and religion) that are both somewhat vague and secondly, what are the implications of the preceding semantic mappings (or labelling) that determine the sense-making process (i.e. the conceptual problems that follows in the wake of the labelling). The aim of the article is to reflect from a historical perspective on the two concepts that make up the question, namely natural andreligion and finally to indicate what is meant by semantic mappings that determine conceptual problems. From this indication it is argued that 'scientific foul play' is the order of the day, that is, that both theology and science are as it were playing 'off-side', thus making the question in the contemporary discourses an emotionally messy endeavour and that, in the author's opinion, the question has therefore to be rephrased.

    Keywords: evolutionary epistomology; nature; naturalism; naturalness of religion; religion; supernatural


     

     

    Full text available only in PDF format.

     

     

    References

    Ahn, G., 1997, 'Religion', in C-J. Thornton (ed.), Theologische Realenzyklopã die, vol. 28, pp. 513-522, Walter de Gruyter, New York.         [ Links ]

    Alston, W.P., 1967a, 'Religion, naturalistic reconstructions of', in P. Edwards (ed.), Encyclopedia of philosophy, vol. 5, pp. 145-147, Macmillan, New York.         [ Links ]

    Alston, W.P., 1967b, 'Religion', in P. Edwards (ed.), Encyclopedia of philosophy, vol. 5, pp. 140-147, Macmillan, New York.         [ Links ]

    Auffarth, C. & Mohr, H., 2006, 'Religion', in K. von Stuckrad (ed.), The Brill dictionary of religion, pp. 1607-1619, Brill, Leiden.         [ Links ]

    Boas, G., 1973, 'Nature', in P.P. Wiener (ed.), Dictionary of the history of ideas, vol. 3, 346-351, Charles Schribner's Sons, New York.         [ Links ]

    Bowker, J., 1997, 'Religion', in J. Bowker (ed.), The Oxford dictionary of world religions, pp. xv-xxiv, Oxford University Press, Oxford.         [ Links ]

    Clayton, P., 1997, God and contemporary science, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.         [ Links ]

    Danto, A.C., 1967, 'Naturalism', in P. Edwards (ed.), Encyclopedia of philosophy, vol. 5, pp. 448-451, Macmillan, New York.         [ Links ]

    Dictionary of philosophy, 2010, 'Naturalism', viewed 29 March 2010, from www.ditext.com/runes/n.html#Naturalism        [ Links ]

    Drees, W.B., 2003, 'Naturalism', in J.W.V. van Huyssteen (ed.), Encyclopedia of science and religion, pp. 593-597, Thomson/Gale, New York.         [ Links ]

    Evers, D., 2010, 'What's religion for?', paper presented at the XIII European Conference on Science and Theology, Edinburgh, Scotland, 7-11 April 2010.         [ Links ]

    Henriksen, J-O., 2003, 'Human nature, religious and philosophical aspects', in J.W.V. van Huyssteen (ed.),Encyclopedia of Science and Religion, pp. 435-440, Thomson/Gale, New York.         [ Links ]

    King, W.L., 1987, 'Religion', in M. Eliade (ed.), The encyclopedia of religion, pp. 282-293, Macmillan, New York.         [ Links ]

    Mocek, R., 1990, 'Natur', in H.J. Sandkü hler (ed.), Europã ische Enzyklopã die zu Philosophie und Wissenschaften, pp. 508-515, Felix Meiner Verlag, Hamburg.         [ Links ]

    McCutheon, R.T., 2005, 'Understanding religion', in C. Partridge (ed.), The world's religions, pp. 10-13, Lion Book, Oxford.         [ Links ]

    Oviedo, L., 2008, 'Is a complete biocognitive account of religion feasible?', Zygon 43(1), 103-126.         [ Links ]

    Post, J.F., 1999, 'Naturalism', in R. Audi (ed.), The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy, pp. 596-597, University Press, Cambridge.         [ Links ]

    Rodrigues, H. & Harding, J.S., 2009, Introduction to the study of religion, Routledge, New York.         [ Links ]

    Smith, J.Z., 1998, 'Religion, religions, religious', in M.C. Taylor (ed.), Critical terms for religious studies, pp. XX, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.         [ Links ]

    Van Huyssteen, W., 2007, 'A brief overview of a theologian's journey to interdisciplinarity', unpublished paper, James I McCord professor of Theology and Science, Princeton Theological Seminary.         [ Links ]

    Ward, G., 2003, 'Supernaturalism', in J.W.V. van Huyssteen (ed.), Encyclopedia of science and religion, pp. 846-848, Thomson/Gale, New York.         [ Links ]

    Wiltsher, C., 2010, 'Can religion be natural?', paper presented at the XIII European Conference on Science and Theology, Edinburgh, Scotland, 7-11 April 2010.         [ Links ]

     

     

    Correspondence:
    Daniël Veldsman
    Department of Dogmatics and Christian Ethics, University of Pretoria
    Pretoria 0002
    South Africa
    Email: danie.veldsman@up.ac.za

    Received: 04 June 2010
    Accepted: 28 Sept. 2010
    Published: 22 Nov. 2010

     

     

    Note: This article is based on a paper delivered at the XIII European Conference on Science and Theology, 7-11 April 2010, Edinburgh, Scotland.