SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.64 issue2COVID-19: No longer status quo for the surgeonConsensus statement regarding minimally invasive surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

    Related links

    • On index processCited by Google
    • On index processSimilars in Google

    Share


    South African Journal of Surgery

    On-line version ISSN 2078-5151Print version ISSN 0038-2361

    S. Afr. j. surg. vol.64 n.2 Cape Town  2026

    https://doi.org/10.36303/sajs.04658 

    VIEWPOINT

     

    Pharmacological treatment for obesity: a scalable solution for South Africa

     

     

    M Conradie-SmitI; JA LubbeII

    IDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
    IIDivision of Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa

    Correspondence

     

     

    Obesity is a disease with many complications, both directly and indirectly linked to adipose tissue excess and dysfunction. Type 2 diabetes (T2DM), stroke and cardiovascular disease account for the top causes of death nationally.1 Our country is confronted with an urgent national emergency and, much like the HIV epidemic, the obesity crisis now demands rapid, scalable, and equitable intervention to protect the nation's health.

     

    Scaled medical treatment - how we win epidemics

    When HIV threatened to overwhelm SA's healthcare system, the response that ultimately saved millions of lives was medication effectively delivered through primary healthcare and community health workers, and a subsequent scalable public programme. The antiretroviral rollout demonstrated something essential: a chronic, progressive, biologically complex disease can be managed through scaling medical treatment at population level, even in a resource-constrained environment.2

    Obesity management medications (OMMs), including GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), semaglutide and liraglutide, and tirzepatide (a GLP1/GIP dual agonist [GLP 1/ GIP RA]), have now been registered in South Africa for the treatment of obesity. They address the underlying neurobiology of appetite dysregulation, produce sustained weight loss, carry independent cardiovascular and metabolic benefits and have a good safety profile.3 They can, in principle, be prescribed by the general practitioner or at a district hospital or clinic, making OMMs the most scalable treatment option.

     

    Access to obesity treatment

    Less than 20% of South Africans have access to privately funded healthcare.4 Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is performed almost exclusively in private facilities in urban centres and only three academic centres in SA offer the service, as MBS teams have to be trained and accredited to perform procedures safely.5,6 Modern obesity treatment requires a multimodal approach - nutritional intervention, physical activity prescription, medical therapy and MBS consideration.7 Obesity assessment and initiation of treatment should be scaled at primary healthcare level with referral of patients that will benefit from MBS.8 In a country still navigating inequitable access to healthcare, a surgery-first approach to obesity treatment will continue to limit access to thousands of deserving patients.

     

    Comorbidities: a strong argument for medicine

    Comorbid diseases like T2DM, hypertension, obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) are justification for early operative intervention in obesity.9 However, the same comorbidities are the ones that elevate operative risk. A patient with uncontrolled T2DM, hypertension and OSA requires detailed evaluation, anaesthetic assessment and access to intensive postoperative care to ensure operative safety.10

    Medical treatment, in contrast, can be initiated immediately without adding risk to an already compromised patient. GLP 1 RAs have independently demonstrated cardiovascular mortality benefit, glycaemic improvement,11 blood pressure reduction,12 improvement in OSA13 and emerging benefit in heart failure14 and chronic kidney disease.15 Importantly, where significant cardiovascular benefit is seen years after MBS has allowed for a decrease in weight, OMM reports show a decrease in major cardiovascular events within 6 months after initiation.16

    The particular complexity of South Africa's comorbidity landscape, notably HIV, is a significant concurrent concern. Over six million South Africans are taking antiretroviral therapy (ART). Interactions between ARTs, metabolic parameters and post-MBS anatomical changes are currently poorly characterised.17 People living with HIV have elevated cardiometabolic risk, with dolutegravir-based ART causing weight gain that may reflect harmful visceral adiposity rather than immune recovery.18,19 Evidence gaps exist regarding obesity complication trajectories by ART regimen and OMM integration into HIV care, particularly in South African public-sector settings.20 Context-specific research is needed to inform appropriate obesity management pathways in people living with HIV, however, medical approaches likely represent the clinically responsible current option.

     

    The role of mental health

    Mental health aspects deserve emphasis in our context, especially as SA has limited services.21 Depression, anxiety and binge eating disorder are highly prevalent among people living with obesity, and MBS in patients with undertreated psychiatric comorbidity is associated with significantly worse outcomes.22 Medical treatment, however, can proceed concurrently with psychological management. GLP-1 RAs are increasingly recognised for their positive impact on mental wellbeing, with robust evidence refuting early concerns about suicidality, though long-term data is required. In contrast, MBS offers only short-to-medium term mental health benefits, with long-term gains fading and some studies demonstrating slightly increased suicidality.23

     

    The role of OMMs in the perioperative setting

    Surgical candidates are encouraged to achieve improved mobility, muscle strength and metabolic parameters before they can safely proceed to theatre.10 This preoperative phase is, in essence, a medical treatment programme to improve outcomes.24 Initiating OMMs prior to surgery is considered ideal as preoperative weight loss reduces surgical risk, particularly in patients with very high body mass index (BMI) or severe comorbidities.25,26 Evidence specifically examining preoperative OMM-induced weight loss and perioperative morbidity remains limited, though available data suggest benefit.27,28 The impact of preoperative weight loss on overall weight loss outcomes following MBS remains contentious.29 However, preoperative OMMs may help to predict surgical response, as they mimic post-surgery weight loss mechanisms.25

    Both weight regain and suboptimal clinical response following MBS are important concerns, as they are linked to recurrence or partial remission of comorbidities. A higher preoperative BMI has been associated with weight gain and a worse weight trajectory after surgery.30 Patients, especially those with a BMI > 50 kg/m2, may therefore benefit from earlier initiation of OMMs rather than other interventions or revision surgery.26,31 Post-MBS complications, like nutritional deficiencies, are well-recognised, whereas medical treatment could be individualised to mitigate risks.32

     

    Medical treatment in multimodal obesity care

    Body weight is homeostatically defended and weight loss triggers physiological adaptations that favour weight regain. Modern pharmacotherapy acts centrally on hypothalamic pathways that regulate appetite and reward, addressing the neurobiological substrate of the disease.33

     

    Conclusion

    None of this is an argument against MBS. The evidence supporting its efficacy is robust, and the national guideline appropriately includes it as a treatment option for specific indications.34 A debate about the appropriate response to a national epidemic is not a debate about individual patient selection only; it is a debate about systems, equity, scale and sustainability. In a biologically complex, stigmatised disease, pharmacological options for obesity play a central role.

    ORCID

    M Conradie-Smit https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-6647

    JA Lubbe https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8397-8685

     

    REFERENCES

    1. Dai H, Alsalhe TA, Chalghaf N, et al. The global burden of disease attributable to high body mass index in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: An analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study. PLoS Med. 2020;17(7):e1003198. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003198.         [ Links ]

    2. Karim SSA, Churchyard GJ, Karim QA, Lawn SD. HIV infection and tuberculosis in South Africa: An urgent need to escalate the public health response. Lancet. 2009;374(9693):921-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60916-8.         [ Links ]

    3. Pedersen SD, Manjoo P, Dash S, et al. Pharmacotherapy for obesity management in adults: 2025 clinical practice guideline update. CMAJ. 2025;197(27):E797-E809. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.250502.         [ Links ]

    4. Statista. Share of medical aid scheme members in South Africa, by population group: Statista; 2024. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1115752/share-of-medical-aid-scheme-members-in-south-africa-by-population-group/.         [ Links ]

    5. SAMMSS. The South African Metabolic Medicine and Surgery Society: SAMMSS; n.d. Available from: https://sammss.org/.         [ Links ]

    6. Cohen RV, Kermansaravi M, Levinson R, et al. International Federation for the Surgery and Other Therapies for Obesity (IFSO) global consensus recommendations for optimising outcomes after sleeve gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 2025;112(10):znaf188. Erratum in: Br J Surg. 2026;113(3):znag011. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znag011.         [ Links ]

    7. Elmaleh-Sachs A, Schwartz JL, Bramante CT, et al. Obesity management in adults. JAMA. 2023;330(20):2000-15. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.19897.         [ Links ]

    8. Murphy A, Diab P, Goedecke J, Conradie-Smit M, May W. Assessment of people living with obesity. S Afr Med J. 2025:e3730. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2025.v115i9b.3730.         [ Links ]

    9. Eisenberg D, Shikora SA, Aarts E, et al. 2022 American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Diseases (IFSO) indication for metabolic and bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2023;33(33):3-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06332-1. Erratum in: Obes Surg. 2023;33(1):15-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06369-2.         [ Links ]

    10. Smit J, Lubbe J, Murphy A, et al. Metabolic and bariatric surgery: Selection and preoperative work-up. S Afr Med J. 2025;115(9b):e3761. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2025.v115i9b.3761.         [ Links ]

    11. Sattar N, García-Pérez LE, Rodríguez A, et al. Tirzepatide and cardiometabolic parameters in obesity: Summary of current evidence. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025;27(10):5386-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16549.         [ Links ]

    12. Moiz A, Zolotarova T, Filion KB, Eisenberg MJ. GLP-1 receptor agonists and blood pressure: A state-of-the-art review of mechanisms, evidence, and clinical implications. Am J Hypertens. 2026;39(5):611-22. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpaf205.         [ Links ]

    13. Li M, Lin H, Yang Q, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: A meta-analysis. Sleep. 2025;48(4):zsae280. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae280.         [ Links ]

    14. Patel R, Kokori E, Olatunji G, et al. Therapeutic potential of GLP-1 receptor agonists in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in obese patients. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2025;22(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-025-00704-1.         [ Links ]

    15. Perkovic V, Tuttle KR, Rossing P, et al. Effects of semaglutide on chronic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(2):109-21. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2403347.         [ Links ]

    16. Deanfield J, Lincoff AM, Kahn SE, et al. Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes by baseline and changes in adiposity measurements: A prespecified analysis of the SELECT trial. Lancet. 2025;406(10516):2257-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01375-3.         [ Links ]

    17. Zino L, Wit F, Rokx C, et al. Outcomes of bariatric surgery in people with human immunodeficiency virus: A retrospective analysis from the ATHENA cohort. Clin Infect Dis. 2023;77(11):1561-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciad404.         [ Links ]

    18. Sax PE, Erlandson KM, Lake JE, et al. Weight gain following initiation of antiretroviral therapy: Risk factors in randomised comparative clinical trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(6):1379-89. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz999.         [ Links ]

    19. Chandiwana NC, Siedner MJ, Marconi VC, et al. Weight gain after HIV therapy initiation: Pathophysiology and implications. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024;109(2):e478-e487. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgad411.         [ Links ]

    20. Chandiwana N, Manne-Goehler J, Gaayeb L, Calmy A, Venter WD. Novel anti-obesity drugs for people with HIV. Lancet HIV. 2024;11(8):e502-e503. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00151-6.         [ Links ]

    21. Atewologun F, Adigun OA, Okesanya OJ, et al. A comprehensive review of mental health services across selected countries in sub-Saharan Africa: Assessing progress, challenges, and future direction. Discov Ment Health. 2025;5(1):49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44192-025-00177-7.         [ Links ]

    22. Dawes AJ, Maggard-Gibbons M, Maher AR, et al. Mental health conditions among patients seeking and undergoing bariatric surgery: A meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;315(2):150-63. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.18118.         [ Links ]

    23. Osborne D, Abdelgadir E. Mental health outcomes in obesity interventions with GLP-1 receptor agonists: Is it similar to other obesity interventions? A narrative review with systematic evidence synthesis. Int J Obes (Lond). 2026. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-025-02002-1.         [ Links ]

    24. Mechanick JI, Apovian C, Brethauer S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures-2019 update: Cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(2):175-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2019.10.025.         [ Links ]

    25. Cohen RV, Park JY, Prager G, et al. Role of obesity-management medications before and after metabolic bariatric surgery: A systematic review. Br J Surg. 2024;111(12):znae284. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae284.         [ Links ]

    26. Alabduljabbar K, le Roux CW. Pharmacotherapy before and after bariatric surgery. Metabolism. 2023;148:155692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2023.155692.         [ Links ]

    27. Grandone I, Nannipieri M, Conte C, Cava E, Schiavo L. Preoperative weight loss by noninvasive approach in patients with obesity scheduled for bariatric and metabolic surgery: An update narrative review of indications and results available until 2024. Updates Surg. 2025;77(7):1985-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02198-x.         [ Links ]

    28. Cunningham JG, Szoka N, Tabone LE, et al. Preoperative and early adjuvant weight loss medications in bariatric surgery patients with body mass index over 60 or suboptimal initial response to surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2023;19(8):832-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2023.01.021.         [ Links ]

    29. MacVicar E, Lucocq J, Geropoulos G, Lamb PJ, Robertson AG. The role of preoperative weight loss interventions on long-term bariatric surgery outcomes: A systematic review. J Clin Med. 2025;14(9):3147. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093147.         [ Links ]

    30. Golzarand M, Toolabi K, Mirmiran P. Obesity medications in patients with recurrent weight gain or suboptimal clinical response following bariatric surgery: A meta-analysis. Int J Obes (Lond). 2025;49(9):1676-87. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-025-01807-4.         [ Links ]

    31. Rudolph A, Hilbert A. Postoperative behavioural management in bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Obes Rev. 2013;14(4):292-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12013. Erratum in: Obes Rev. 2014;15(1):74-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12013.         [ Links ]

    32. O'Kane M, Parretti HM, Pinkney J, et al. British Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Society guidelines on perioperative and postoperative biochemical monitoring and micronutrient replacement for patients undergoing bariatric surgery-2020 update. Obes Rev. 2020;21(11):e13087. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13087.         [ Links ]

    33. Purnell JQ, le Roux CW. Hypothalamic control of body fat mass by food intake: The key to understanding why obesity should be treated as a disease. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024;26 Suppl 2:3-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.15478.         [ Links ]

    34. Conradie-Smit M, May W. Transforming obesity care: Evidence-based guideline for South Africa. S Afr Med J. 2025;115(9b):e4377. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2025.v115i9b.4377.         [ Links ]

     

     

    Correspondence:
    M Conradie-Smit
    Email: marlic@sun.ac.za