SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Article References

VAUGHAN, Christopher L  and  EVANS, Michael D. Diagnosing breast cancer: An opportunity for innovative engineering. SAMJ, S. Afr. med. j. [online]. 2012, vol.102, n.6, pp. 562-564. ISSN 0256-9574.

    1. Mukherjee S. The Emperor of All Maladies. A Biography of Cancer. New York: Scribner, 2010. [ Links ]

    2. Vaughan CL. Digital X-rays come of age. S Afr Med J 2006;96(7):610-612. [ Links ]

    3. Evans DT, Proctor EM, Brion FR, Ceelan TM. Independent compression and positioning device for use in mammography. United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Number 3,971,950, 27 July 1976. [ Links ]

    4. Karellas A, Vedantham S. Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade. Medical Physics 2008;35(11):4878-4897. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/L2986144] [ Links ]

    5. Vaughan CL. New developments in medical imaging to detect breast cancer. Continuing Medical Education 2011;29(3):122-125. [ Links ]

    6. Beningfield S, Potgieter H, Nicol A, et al. Report on a new type of trauma full-body digital X-ray machine.Emergency Radiology 2003;10(1):23-29. [ Links ]

    7. Lease A, Vaughan CL, Beningfield SJ, Potgieter JH, Booysen A. Feasibility of using Lodox technology for mammography. In: Antonuk LE, Yaffe MJ, eds. Medical Imaging: Physics of Medical Imaging.Proceedings SPIE 2002;4682:656-664. [ Links ]

    8. Hussein K, Vaughan CL, Douglas TS. Modeling, validation and application of a mathematical tissue-equivalent breast phantom for linear slot-scanning digital mammography. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2009;54(6):1533-1553. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/54/6/009] [ Links ]

    9. Vaughan CL. Low dose digital X-rays for mammographic screening. National Institutes of Health, grant number 1R21CA101705-01A2, 2005. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/oer.htm (accessed February 2012). [ Links ]

    10. Yang W, Dempsey PJ. Diagnostic breast ultrasound: current status and future directions. Radiol Clin North Am 2007;45(5):845-861. [ Links ]

    11. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al. for the ACRIN6666 Investigators. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008;299(18):2151-2163. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.18.2151] [ Links ]

    12. Schaefer FKW, Waldmann A, Katalinic A, et al Influence of additional breast ultrasound on cancer detection in a cohort study for quality assurance in breast diagnosis - analysis of 102,577 diagnostic procedures. European Radiology 2010;20(5):1085-1092. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1641-x] [ Links ]

    13. Kelly KM, Dean J, Comulada WS, Lee S-J. Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts. European Radiology 2010;20(3):734-742. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1588-y] [ Links ]

    14. Vaughan CL, Evans MD. Dual-modality scanning system for detecting breast cancer. WO/2011/153555, International Application Number PCT/ZA2011/000037. World Intellectual Property Organization. http://www.wipo.int/patentscope/ (accessed 8 December 2011). [ Links ]

    15. De Villiers MS. Method of reconstructing tomographic images. United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Number 6,788,758, 7 September 2004. [ Links ]

    16. Autier P, Boniol M, Gavin A, Vatten LJ. Breast cancer mortality in neighbouring European countries with different levels of screening but similar access to treatment: trend analysis of WHO mortality database.BMJ 2011;343:d4411. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4411] [ Links ]

    17. Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen TH, et al. Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology 2011;260(3):658-663. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11110469] [ Links ]