SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Article References

CHUNDER, A et al. A randomised controlled trial of suture materials used for caesarean section skin closure: Do wound infection rates differ?. SAMJ, S. Afr. med. j. [online]. 2012, vol.102, n.6, pp.374-383. ISSN 2078-5135.

    1. Altman AD, Allen VM, McNeil SA, Dempster J. Pfannenstiel incision closure: a review of current skin closure techniques. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009;31(6):514-520. [ Links ]

    2. The CORONIS Trial Collaborative Group. International study of caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised fractional, factorial trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2007;7:24-58. [ Links ]

    3. Alderdice F, McKenna D, Dornan J. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;2:CD003577. [ Links ]

    4. Rousseau JA, Girard K, Tircot-Lemay L, Thomas N. A randomised study comparing skin closure in cesarean section: staples vs subcuticular sutures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:265.e1-265.e4. [ Links ]

    5. Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Gottardi A, et al. Cosmetic outcomes of various skin closure methods following cesarean delivery: a randomised trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203(1):36e1-36e8. [ Links ]

    6. Basha SL, Rochon ML, Quinones JN, Coassolo KM, Rust OA, Smulian JC. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203(1):285.e1-8. [ Links ]

    7. Anderson ER, Gates S. Techniques and materials for closure of the abdominal wall in caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;4:CD004663. [ Links ]

    8. Olsen MA, Butler AM, Williers DM, Devkota P, Gross GA, Fraser VJ. Risk factors for surgical site infections after low transverse caesarean section. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29(6):477-484. [ Links ]

    9. Gaertner I, Burkhardt T, Beinder E. Scar appearance of different skin and subcutaneous tissure closure techniques in caesarean section: a randomized study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;138(1):29-33. [ Links ]

    10. Koigi-Kamau R, Kabare LW, Wanyoike-Gichuhi J. Incidence of wound infection after caesarean delivery in a district hospital in central Kenya. East Afr Med J 2005;2(7):357-361. [ Links ]

    11. Islam A, Ehsan A. Comparison of suture material and technique of closure of subcutaneous fat and skin in caesarean section. North Am J Med Sci 2011;3(2):85-88. [ Links ]

    12. Ezechi CO, Edet A, Akinlade H, Gab-Okafor CV, Herbertson E. Incidence and risk factors for caesarean wound infection in Lagos Nigeria. BMC Research Notes 2009;2:186-190. [ Links ]

    13. Tuuli MG, Rampersad RM, Carbone JF, Stamilio D, Macones GA, Odibo AO. Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117(3):682-690. [ Links ]

    14. Clay FS, Walsh CA, Walsh SR. Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204(5):378-383. [ Links ]

    15. Petrosillo N, Drapeau CMJ, Nicastri E, Martini L, Ippolito G, Moro ML, ANIPIO. Surgical site infections in Italian Hospitals: a prospective multicentre study. BMC Infect Dis 2008;8:34-49. [ Links ]

    16. Ward VP, Charlett A, Fagan J, Crawshaw SC. Enhanced surgical site infection surveillance following caesarean section: experience of a multicentre collaborative post-discharge system. J Hosp Infect 2008;70(2):166-173. [ Links ]

    17. Litta P, Vita P, Konishi de Toffoli J, Onnis GL. Risk factors for complicating infections after cesarean section . Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 1995;22(1):171-175. [ Links ]