SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Article References

POURIS, Anastassios. Science in South Africa: the dawn of a renaissance?. S. Afr. j. sci. [online]. 2012, vol.108, n.7-8, pp. 83-89. ISSN 0038-2353.

    1. Inglesi-Lotz R, Pouris A. Scientometric impact assessment of a policy instrument: The case of rating researchers on scientific outputs in South Africa. Scientometrics. 2011;88:747-760. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0440-8 [ Links ]

    2. Department of Science and Technology. Ten-year innovation plan [document on the Internet]. c2007 [cited 2011 July]. Available from: http://www.dst.gov.za/publications-policies/strategies-reports/The%20Ten-Year%20Plan%20for%20Science%20and%20Technology.pdf [ Links ]

    3. Steyn WGA, De Villiers PA. Public funding of higher education in South Africa by means of formulae [document on the Internet]. c2007 [cited 2011 March]. Available from: http://www.che.ac.za/documents/d000146/5-Review_HE_SA_2007.pdf [ Links ]

    4. Department of Science and Technology. DST strategic plan for fiscal years 2011-2016. c2011 [cited 2011 July]. Available from: http://www.dst.gov.za/publications-policies/strategies-reports/DST_STRAT_PLAN_2011.pdf [ Links ]

    5. Department of Science and Technology. National survey of research and experimental development (2008/09 fiscal year). Pretoria: Department of Science and Technology; 2010. [ Links ]

    6. Pouris A. The writing on the wall of South African science: A scientometric assessment. S Afr J Sci. 1996;92:267-271. [ Links ]

    7. Pouris A. South Africa's research publication record: The last ten years. S Afr J Sci. 2003;99:425-428. [ Links ]

    8. Tijssen JWR. Africa's contribution to the worldwide research literature: New analytical perspectives, trends, and performance indicators. Scientometrics. 2007;71(2):303-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1658-3 [ Links ]

    9. De Solla Price D. The productivity of research scientists. In: Yearbook of Science and the Future. Chicago: University of Chicago, Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc.; 1975. [ Links ]

    10. Science and engineering indicators - 2010. Arlington, VA: National Science Board, National Science Foundation; 2010. [ Links ]

    11. European Commission. Towards a European research area science, technology and innovation. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2007. [ Links ]

    12. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD science, technology and industry outlook. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2010. [ Links ]

    13. Braun T, Glanzel W, Schubert A. One more version of the facts and figures on publication output and relative citation impact of 107 countries 1978-1980. Scientometrics. 1987;11(1-2):9-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02016625 [ Links ]

    14. Albarran P, Crespo AJ, Ortuno I, Ruiz-Castillo J. A comparison of the scientific performance of the US and the European Union at the turn of the 21st century. Scientometrics. 2007;85(1):329-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0223-7 [ Links ]

    15. King DA. The scientific impact of nations. Nature. 2004;430:311-316. [ Links ]

    16. Tsay MY. A bibliometric analysis of hydrogen energy literature 1965-2005. Scientometrics. 2008;75(3):421-438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1785-x [ Links ]

    17. Pouris A, Pouris A. Scientometrics of a pandemic: HIV/AIDS research in South Africa and the world. Scientometrics. 2011;86(2):541-552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0277-6 [ Links ]

    18. Narin F, Hamilton KS, Olivastro D. The increasing link between US technology and public science. Res Policy. 1997;26(3):317-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00013-9 [ Links ]

    19. Lubango ML, Pouris A. Is patenting activity impeding the academic performance of South African university researchers? Technol Soc. 2009;31:315-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2009.03.011 [ Links ]

    21. Leydesdorff L. Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluation. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec. 2008;59(2):278-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20743 [ Links ]

    22. Seglen P. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ. 1997;314:497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497 [ Links ]

    23. Kahn M. A bibliometric analysis of South Africa's scientific outputs - some trends and implications. S Afr J Sci. 2011;107(1/2):1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v107i1/2.406 [ Links ]

    24. Reynhardt EC. [Universities - research in the physical sciences in perspective.] S Afr J Sci. 1982;78:393-399. Afrikaans. [ Links ]

    25. Melck AP. Methods of financing universities with special reference to formula funding in South Africa. DCom thesis, Stellenbosch, University of Stellenbosch, 1982. [ Links ]

    26. Pouris A. Effects of funding policies on research publications in South Africa. S Afr J Sci. 1991;87(3-4):78-81. [ Links ]

    27. Gevers W, Hammes M, Mati X, Mouton J, Page-Shipp R, Pouris A, editors. Report on a strategic approach to research publishing in South Africa. Pretoria: Academy of Science of South Africa; 2006. [ Links ]

    28. Vaughan LC. Alternatives to the publication subsidy for research funding. S Afr J Sci. 2008;104:91-96. [ Links ]