SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Article References

ALEIXANDRE-BENAVENT, Rafael et al. Bibliometric analysis of publications by South African viticulture and oenology research centres. S. Afr. j. sci. [online]. 2012, vol.108, n.5-6, pp. 74-84. ISSN 0038-2353.

    1. Aleixandre JL, Crespo F. [National and international wine geography]. Valencia: Editorial Intertécnica; 2005. Spanish. [ Links ]

    2. Melamane XL, Strong PJ, Burgess JE. Treartment of wine distillery wastewater: A review with emphasis on anaerobic membrane reactors. S Afr J Enol Vit. 2007;28:25-36. [ Links ]

    3. Keyser M, Britz TJ, Witthuhn RC. Fingerprinting and identification of bacteria present in UASB granules used to treat winery, brewery, distillery or peach-lye canning wastewater. S Afr J Enol Vit. 2007;28:69-79. [ Links ]

    4. Sigge GO, Green J, Du Plessis KR, Britz TJ. Investigating the effect of ozone on the biodegradability of distillery wastewater. S Afr J Enol Vit. 2007;28:155-162. [ Links ]

    5. Zingelwa NS, Wooldridge J. Uptake and accumulation of mineral elements from winery and distillery effluents by Typha latifolia and Phragmites australis. S Afr J Enol Vit. 2009;30:43-48. [ Links ]

    6. Vaudour E, Shaw AB. A worldwide perspective on viticultural zoning. S Afr J Enol Vit. 2005;26:106-115. [ Links ]

    7. Retief E, Damm U, Van Niekerk JM, McLeod A, Fourie R. A protocol for molecular detection of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora in grapevine wood. S Afr J Sci. 2005;101:139-142. [ Links ]

    8. Koopman TA, Linde CC, Fourie PH, McLeod A. Epidemiological importance of Plasmopara viticola oosporic infections in South African vineyards. S Afr J Sci. 2007;103(1/2):9. [ Links ]

    9. Pietersen G. Tackling the grapevine leafroll disease problem in South Africa. S Afr J Sci. 2007;103(1/2):2. [ Links ]

    10. Van Niekerk JM, Halleen F, Fourie PH. Spore dispersal patterns of grapevine trunk disease pathogens. S Afr J Sci. 2007;103(1/2):8. [ Links ]

    11. Minnaar PP, Booyse M. Differentiation between wines according to geographical regions in the Western Cape (South Africa) using multivariate analysis based on selected chemical parameters in young red wines. S Afr J Enol Vit. 2004;25:89-93. [ Links ]

    12. Minnaar PP, Rohwer ER, Booyse M. Investigating the use of element analysis for differentiation between the geographic origins of Western Cape wines. S Afr J Enol Vit. 2005;26:95-105. [ Links ]

    13. De Beer D, Joubert E, Marais J, Du Toit W, Fourie B, Manley M. Characterisation of Pinotage wine during maturation on different oak products. S Afr J Enol Vit. 2008;29:39-49. [ Links ]

    14. Van Jaarsveld FP, Hatting S, Minnaar P. Rapid induction of ageing character in brandy products. Part I. Effects of extraction media and preparation conditions. S Afr J Enol Vit. 2009;30:1-15. [ Links ]

    15. Sooryamoorthy R. Medical research in South Africa: A scientometric analysis of trends, patterns, productivity and partnership. Scientometrics. 2010;84:863-885. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0169-9 [ Links ]

    16. Molatudi M, Moltja N, Pouris A. A bibliometric study of bioinformatics research in South Africa. Scientometrics. 2009;81:47-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2048-6 [ Links ]

    17. Sooryamoorthy R. Scientific publications of engineers in South Africa, 1975-2005. Scientometrics. 2010;86(1):211-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0288-3 [ Links ]

    18. Pouris A, Pouris A. Scientometrics of a pandemic: HIV/AIDS research in South Africa and the World. Scientometrics. 2010;86(2):541-552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0277-6 [ Links ]

    19. Kahn M. A bibliometric analysis of South Africa's scientific outputs - some trends and implications. S Afr J Sci. 2011;107(1/2), Art. #406, 6 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v107i1/2.406. [ Links ]

    20. Vinkler P. Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications. Scientometrics. 1986;10:157-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02026039 [ Links ]

    21. White HD, Mccain K. Bibliometrics. Ann Rev Inf Sci Tech. 1989;24:119-186. [ Links ]

    22. Van Raan AFJ. Scientometrics: State-of-the-art. Scientometrics. 1997;38:205-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02461131 [ Links ]

    23. Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. J Am Med Assoc. 2006;295:90-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.L90, PMid:16391221 [ Links ]

    24. Aleixandre-Benavent R, Valderrama Zurian JC, Gonzalez Alcaide G. [The impact factor of scientific journals: Limitations and alternative indicators]. Prof Inf. 2007;16:4-11. Spanish. [ Links ]

    25. Kretschmer H. Coauthorship networks of invisible college and institutionalized communities. Scientometrics. 1994;30:363-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02017234 [ Links ]

    26. Frame JD, Carpenter MP. International research collaboration. Soc Stud Sci. 1979;9:481-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631277900900405 [ Links ]

    27. Katz JS, Martin BR. What is research collaboration? Res Policy. 1997;26:1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1 [ Links ]

    28. Newman MEJ. Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:5200-5205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307545100, PMid:14745042, PMCid:387296 [ Links ]

    29. Melin G, Persson O. Studying research collaboration using coauthorships. Scientometrics. 1996;36:363-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02129600 [ Links ]

    30. Gonzalez-Alcaide G, Valderrama-Zurian JC, Aleixandre-Benavent R. Research fronts and collaboration patterns in Reproductive Biology. Coauthorship networks and institutional collaboration. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:941-956. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/jfertnstert.2007.07.1378, PMid:18177648 [ Links ]

    31. Scott JP. Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage; 2001. [ Links ]

    32. Newman MEJ. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:404-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.021544898, PMid:11149952 [ Links ]

    33. Gonzalez-Alcaide G, Alonso Arroyo A, Gonzalez De Dios J, Perez Sempere A, Valderrama Zurian JC, Aleixandre-Benavent R. [Co-authorship networks and institutional collaboration in Revista de Neurología]. Rev Neurol. 2008;46:642-651. Spanish. PMid:18509820 [ Links ]

    34. Glanzel W, Veugelers R. Science for wine: A bibliometric assessment for wine and grape research for wine-producing and consuming countries. Am J Enol Viticult. 2006;57:23-32. [ Links ]

    35. Bibliometrics program. Version 1. Valencia: Spanish Research Council-CSIC; 2010. [ Links ]

    36. Batagelj V, Mrvar A. Pajek program for large network analysis. Slovenia: University of Ljubljana; 2001. [ Links ]

    37. Tijssen RJW, Mouton J, Leeuwen TN, Boshoff N. How relevant are local scholarly journals in global science? A case study of South Africa. Res Eval. 2006;15:163-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154406781775904 [ Links ]

    38. Cunningham SJ, Dillon SM. Authorship patterns in information systems. Scientometrics. 1997;39:19-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02457428 [ Links ]

    39. Klein JT. Interdisciplinary needs: The current context. Libr Trends. 1996;45:134-154. [ Links ]

    40. Ponds R. The limits to internationalization of scientific research collaboration. J Technol Transf. 2009;34:76-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-008-9083-1 [ Links ]

    41. Sooryamoorthy R. Collaboration and publication: How collaborative are scientists in South Africa? Scientometrics. 2009;80:419-439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2074-z [ Links ]

    42. Georghiou L. Global cooperation in research. Res Pol. 1998;27:611-626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00054-7 [ Links ]

    43. Valderrama Zurian JC, Gonzalez Alcaide G, Valderrama Zurian FJ, Aleixandre-Benavent R, Miguel Dasit A. [Co-authorship networks and institutional collaboration in Revista Espanola de Cardiología]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2007;60:117-130. Spanish. PMid:17338877 [ Links ]

    44. Barabasi AL, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science. 1999;286:509-511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.50 [ Links ]

    45. Wagner CS, Leydesdorff, L. Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Res Pol. 2005;34:1608-1618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.002 [ Links ]

    46. Figg WD, Duna L, Liewehr DJ, et al. Scientific collaboration results in higher citation rates of published articles. Pharmacotherapy. 2006;26:759-767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1592/phco.26.6.759, PMid:16716129 [ Links ]

    47. Teasley S, Wolinsky S. Scientific collaborations at a distance. Science. 2001;292:2254-2255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1061619, PMid:11423638 [ Links ]

    48. Merrill J, Hripcsak G. Using social network analysis within a department of biomedical informatics to induce a discussion of academic communities of practice. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2008;15:780-782. http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2717, PMid:18756000, PMCid:2585526 [ Links ]

    49. Saegusa A. Survey finds deep insularity among Japanese scientists. Nature. 1999;401:314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/43740 [ Links ]

    50. Cusmano L, Morrison A, Rabellotti R. Catching up trajectories in the wine sector: A comparative study of Chile, Italy, and South Africa. World Dev. 2010;38(11):1588-1602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.05.002 [ Links ]