<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1015-6046</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Psychology in Society]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Psychol. Soc.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1015-6046</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Psychology in Society]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1015-60462011000100005</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Gender and AIDS: exploring an intimate relationship]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mannell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jenevieve]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Gender Institute London School of Economics & Political Science  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>41</numero>
<fpage>59</fpage>
<lpage>61</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1015-60462011000100005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1015-60462011000100005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1015-60462011000100005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri></article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p align="right"><font size="2" face="Verdana"><b>BOOK REVIEWS</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="4" face="verdana"><b>Gender and aids: exploring an intimate relationship</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"><b>Jenevi&egrave;ve Mannell</b></font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"> Gender Institute   London School of Economics &amp; Political Science <a href="mailto:j.c.mannell@lse.ac.uk">j.c.mannell@lse.ac.uk</a></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana">Hunter, Mark (2010) <b>Love in the time of AIDS.</b> Scottsville, Pietermartizburg: University   of KwaZulu-Natal Press. ISBN 978 1 96914 203 2 pbk. Pages 303.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font size="2" face="Verdana"><b>Love in the Time of AIDS</b> explores notions of love and intimacy among South Africans   as a means of shedding some light on the overwhelming rise in HIV prevalence in   some areas of the country from one to 30 percent in only 15 years. Drawing the reader   through the history of South Africa's political economy from colonialism to the postapartheid   and capitalist era, the book provides a compelling account of the ways in   which economic forces have interacted with individual ideas about love and sex to   produce what Hunter refers to as the "materiality of everyday sex" &#150;    where love and   relationships are intimately linked with sex for material benefits.</font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"> The book is based on an ethnography of Mandeni, KwaZulu-Natal, where Hunter lived   extensively between 2002 and 2005. Women in South Africa constitute 60 percent of   HIV cases in the country, and Mandeni is one of the worst affected with an overall   prevalence of 39 percent among women presenting in antenatal clinics. The book   provides a close and detailed exploration of notions of intimacy in this rural community.   This is contrasted and compared with a range of historical material, which lends a   particularly intriguing analysis to the role of intimacy in individuals' everyday lives.   While this book is clearly anthropological, it will be of particular interest to social   psychologists interested in issues of sexuality and the interaction of sexual behaviour   with broader historical, economic and social contexts.</font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"> In order to begin this task of an historically-rooted investigation of shifting notions of   intimacy &#150;    which encompasses notions of gender, masculinity, femininity, sex, fertility,   pleasure and love &#150;    Hunter takes the reader through a history of intimacy during   apartheid in part one of the book. He argues that the changing structure of families and   households and the rise of HIV cannot be seen as a "degeneration" of family life or as a   consequence of apartheid, but rather are part and parcel of the economic and political   changes that took place in South Africa during the apartheid period from 1948 to 1994.</font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"> Hunter makes several key points to support this argument, one being the role of men's   migrancy from the rural areas to the mines and factories during the height of South   Africa's industrialisation. While this is a subject frequently referred to in studies of   sexuality and HIV in South Africa to point to how men's separation from their wives for   long periods contributed to male promiscuity and higher HIV prevalence, it is framed differently here. By rooting his observations of the shift of men from home-based   agricultural subsistence to migrant wage labour within the changing role of relationships   between men and women, Hunter explores how migration brought about a shift in the   system of marriage from a reliance on <i>ilobolo</i> (bride price) being paid by a man's father   in cattle to its payment through wages. <i>Ilobolo</i> and marriage came to be associated   with a largely absent man sending wages back home to support his household. It is   through this chain of events that Hunter argues that the notion of "provider love" was   introduced &#150;    love as a combination of practical considerations represented by both   financial stability and emotional attachment.</font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"> Hunter makes another, less well-recognised point, about the changing nature of   sexuality in South Africa in his consideration of the role of Christian missionaries in   defining romantic love as something that exists between one man and one woman in   order to counteract the practice of polygamy. By promoting marital choice and the   importance of life-long companionship, Christianity succeeded in intertwining romantic   love and sex in new ways. A consequence of this, writes Hunter, is that penetrative sex   became associated with masculinity and manhood in contrast to previous practices of  "thigh sex", a non-penetrative form of sexual interaction that had been used by   unmarried couples to prevent pregnancy. Rather than using this example to offer a   simplistic explanation of the reason for an increase in HIV prevalence, Hunter uses this   change in behaviour to demonstrate how socio-historical influences have brought about   changes in ideas about what constitutes sex, notions of love, marriage/ pre-marriage   and cultural practice.</font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"> Consistent with this focus on the changing notions of love, Hunter explores the role of   women as industrial workers during the economic crisis of the mid-1970s. The   increasing unemployment of men meant they could no longer support women in rural   homesteads. Women represented a lower-wage resource for industry, and since faced   with poor prospects of finding a man who could support them, began to move away   from rural areas into new jobs in cities and industrial areas. This resulted in a drop in   marriage rates and an increasing independence of working women. However, as the   recession continued further cuts were made and with rising unemployment these newly   independent women began to search for new ways to ensure financial stability outside   of either marriage or employment &#150;    ultimately contributing to a rise in sex being   exchanged for material benefits.</font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"> These three observations &#150;    the introduction of provider love, the association between   masculinity and penetrative sex, and the sexual nature of women's new   entrepreneurialism &#150;    are used by Hunter to support a more nuanced picture of how   sexuality has led to the sharp increase in HIV prevalence than has often been painted   of South Africa. The second part of the book delves further into this complex landscape   by looking at more recent history to critically examine the consequences of rightsbased   discourses being promoted by international organisations. In addition to   promoting increased condom use among partners, rights-based language has also   been appropriated by women to emphasise their right to multiple sexual partners and   promiscuity in order to put them on an equal basis with men. This is paralleled by the   perceived failure of men to fulfil the socially constructed role of male provider in a   climate of mass unemployment, which in turn has often presented itself as domestic   violence as men try to assert control. Hunter pulls these sections one and two together   in showing how the historical shift in notions of intimacy have set the stage for these modern appropriations, thus contributing to a perfect storm of social factors for HIV to   flourish.</font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"> The book does not disappoint should the reader be drawn to it by the alluring title   alone. By tracing intimacy through the specific political and economic changes that   have taken place in South Africa over the last 50 years, Hunter offers up a laudable   thesis that the relationship between intimacy and AIDS needs to be approached as a   dialectical rather than influential relationship. Hunter's case study of how intimacy has   interacted with the changing history of financial needs and obligations in South Africa   points to the inadequacy of models that take political economy only as an influence   over the intimate lives of individuals and do not consider the role individuals play in this.   Individuals are not carrying out sexual behaviours that have existed for centuries   influenced by cultural traditions and social norms, but are constantly reshaping   dominant notions of love, sex and relationships. Hunter's strong argument on this   subject provides an important contribution to the study of sexuality more broadly.</font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"> In the third and final section of the book Hunter draws a detailed account of two   interventions that have attempted to address HIV and AIDS in South Africa through   rights approaches: loveLife and the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC). This is the one   section where some readers may be left wanting. While his insight into both of these   social movements is interesting, a clearer link between these two case examples and   Hunter's overall thesis would have filled a gap in the book. The intervention discussion   might have been better utilised to show how the lessons arising from a historically-rooted   understanding of sexuality and intimacy in South Africa can be drawn on to   design programmes that will reduce the still exceedingly high HIV prevalence rates.   Instead Hunter leaves readers to draw their own conclusions about the practical   implications of his work.</font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"> Nevertheless, Hunter's strong writing and ability to ground his theoretical questions in   practical and readable examples from his research, makes this book a valuable read   for both practitioners looking to address the complex social realities surrounding HIV   and AIDS, and theoreticians seeking to develop stronger linkages between sexuality   and political economy. Broadly, <b>Love in the time of AIDS</b> makes a valuable   contribution to our understanding of the interface between history, sex, and love in   places where HIV and AIDS is a dominant reality.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ ]]></body>
<REFERENCES></REFERENCES
</article>
