<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0038-223X</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0038-223X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0038-223X2012000800013</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The development of a remote-controlled highwall rockbroom-a world first for the open-pit mining industry]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[van Rensburg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Melis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,AngloAmerican Platinum Rock Engineering Department ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Melis & Du Plessis Consulting Engineering (Pty) Ltd  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2012</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2012</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>112</volume>
<numero>8</numero>
<fpage>755</fpage>
<lpage>759</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0038-223X2012000800013&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0038-223X2012000800013&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0038-223X2012000800013&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Jointed rock slopes are generally stable, as there is no freedom of movement for blocks of rock. In an open- pit mining environment, blasting opens up space into which blocks of rock can fail, resulting in the common occurrence of slope failure. Prior to the blasting of a trim pattern, the immediate highwall is scaled, where loose rock material is removed by means of a mechanical scaler. As mining of the pit progresses, the height of the scaled highwall from the pit floor progressively increases. These highwalls are never scaled again for the remainder of the pit life, and time-dependant deterioration contributes to these highwalls becoming subject to rockfall and, sometimes, slope failure. This paper documents the development of a South African innovation, a remote-controlled mechanical highwall scaler, a world first for the mining industry. The scaler will enable open-pit highwalls to be scaled from crest to toe whenever the need arises. It will reduce the risk associated with highwalls and deliver on the Anglo American promise of producing safe, profitable platinum.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[open-pit mining]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[rockfall]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[slope stability]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[mechanical scaling.]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b>JOURNAL    PAPER</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="4"><b>The development    of a remote-controlled highwall rockbroom—a world first for the open-pit mining    industry</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b>D. van Rensburg<sup>I</sup>;    L. Melis<sup>II</sup></b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><sup>I</sup>AngloAmerican    Platinum, Mogalakwena Mine, Rock Engineering Department    <br>   <sup>II</sup>Melis &amp; Du Plessis Consulting Engineering (Pty) Ltd, Rock Slope    Engineering</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <hr noshade size="1">     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b>SYNOPSIS</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Jointed rock slopes    are generally stable, as there is no freedom of movement for blocks of rock.    In an open- pit mining environment, blasting opens up space into which blocks    of rock can fail, resulting in the common occurrence of slope failure.    <br>   Prior to the blasting of a trim pattern, the immediate highwall is scaled, where    loose rock material is removed by means of a mechanical scaler. As mining of    the pit progresses, the height of the scaled highwall from the pit floor progressively    increases. These highwalls are never scaled again for the remainder of the pit    life, and time-dependant deterioration contributes to these highwalls becoming    subject to rockfall and, sometimes, slope failure.    <br>   This paper documents the development of a South African innovation, a remote-controlled    mechanical highwall scaler, a world first for the mining industry. The scaler    will enable open-pit highwalls to be scaled from crest to toe whenever the need    arises. It will reduce the risk associated with highwalls and deliver on the    Anglo American promise of producing safe, profitable platinum.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b>Keywords:</b>    open-pit mining, rockfall, slope stability, mechanical scaling.</font></p> <hr noshade size="1">     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>Introduction</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The Safety, Health    and Environmental Policy at Anglo American's Mogalakwena Platinum Mine has identified    highwall stability as one of the major safety risks of the operation. At Mogalakwena,    slope instability and rockfall risk are highlighted as the major focus areas    in reducing highwall risk. A comprehensive slope-monitoring strategy has been    implemented and refined over the past decade and includes technologies such    as automated prisms and laser systems, and slope stability radar systems. These    are all very effective methods in reducing the risk posed by large-scale slope    instability; however, none of them can monitor or forewarn of the much smaller    and frequent but dangerous rockfalls from the highwalls.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">An innovative method    of significantly reducing the rockfall risk at Mogalakwena is being developed    for the rock engineering department at Mogalakwena Platinum Mine, as a collaborative    initiative between Wepex, a South African geotechnical contracting company,    and consulting engineers Melis and Du Plessis, both companies specializing in    aspects of the civil and mining industries in Southern Africa.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">This paper presents    the results of tests conducted with the prototype in Lafarge's Ridgeview quarry    in Durban between 7 and 10 February 2012.</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>Rockfall risk    in the open-pit mining environment.</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Overall open-pit    slope stability and inter-ramp stability are governed by the local geological    structure, the quality of the rock mass, and its stability within the prevailing    stress regime. They are generally analysed using numerical modelling methods.    The geological structure controls the overall and inter-ramp stability, as well    as berm stability, and may be analysed using kinematic methods. Berms are designed    to intercept and contain rockfalls that originate from higher up the slope.    In this manner, they prevent falling rock from continuing further down the slope    and possibly endangering the lives of personnel and damaging equipment working    in close proximity to the slope face.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Rockfall hazards    in the open-pit environment occur for a number of reasons. The main contributory    factors are aggressive pit slope design, time dependent deterioration of the    rock mass, poor limit blast performance, full-depth ramp blasting, and not cleaning    to the mining limit. All of these factors result in overall poor trim blast    performance and an immediate loss of a portion of the designed catchment width    of the berms. To compensate for these realities, and to reduce the danger arising    from falling rocks, adequate measures have to be taken to reduce the risk to    personnel and equipment. These measures include increasing the berm width, improved    mining methods, building windrows, and installing drape mesh or rockfall barriers.    These measures lead to more conservative designs and mining methods, thus increasing    cost and maintenance requirements.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b><i>Managing    rockfall risk at Mogalakwena</i></b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Mogalakwena Platinum    Mine has adopted a proactive approach in managing and reducing the risk associated    with rockfall. Some of these measures include limit blasting techniques, which    include the use of pre-splits; bench face scaling using scaling rigs; the use    of drape meshing and gabions; and the enforcement of a 15 m exclusion zone at    the toe of the slope. Although these measures are very effective, they ultimately    add to cost and impact on production, and it is for this reason that Mogalakwena    embarked on a quest to find a system that would remove, or at least significantly    reduce, the rockfall risk from the highwalls. Various attempts were made in    the past to accomplish this, including the use of water jets and dragging heavy    chains down the slope, but none of these proved to be very effective.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">A collaborative    effort between Wepex and Melis and Du Plessis, facilitated by the rock engineering    department at Mogalakwena, has resulted in the development of a concept and    a prototype that will greatly reduce rockfalls from highwalls. The result is    a remote-controlled and steered highwall scaler and berm cleaner, aptly named    the SmartBroom<sup>TM</sup> (with intellectual property and copyrights protected).    The SmartBroom simply dislodges and brushes away loose rocks as it traverses    the highwalls and berms. It will now be possible for the first time to safely    scale highwalls of any height. This concept and customized technology being    developed is a world first. It will benefit the Anglo American Group, and the    broader open-pit mining industry, in terms of greatly mitigating and managing    rockfall risk, and will be an example of industry best-practice in achieving    the goal of zero harm in our mines.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The SmartBroom    can be used without interfering with the mining sequence or production while    maintaining the highest levels of safety. It can be used continuously or periodically    as and when required.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b><i>The SmartBroom</i></b></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The prototype of    the SmartBroom was mounted as an attachment to a carrier, namely a mesh-decoiler.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The decoiler was    originally developed two years ago as a remote-controlled and steered unit that    enabled drape mesh to be safely and quickly installed on open-pit highwalls    (<a href="#f1">Figure 1</a>). It has been used at Debswana's Jwaneng diamond    mine in Botswana and at Mogalakwena, where it proved to be very reliable and    extremely safe to operate.</font></p>     <p><a name="f1"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/13f01.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">It soon became    apparent that the decoiler could serve as a platform for mounting the prototype    SmartBroom for the initial trials. Only minor technological adjustments were    necessary to convert the decoiler to a SmartBroom carrier.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The decoiler consists    of a long shaft with a 3 m diameter wheel on each end. The wheels are flanked    by a cable drum and cantilever arm on the outside of either wheel. Control cables    that are wound onto the cable drums are anchored at the top of the highwall.    The cable drums are free-spinning with a damper control unit to prevent excessive    de-winding. The cables pass through a double conical brake mechanism mounted    on the inside of the cantilever arms.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The brakes are    hydraulically activated and are remotely controlled via a radio-servo systems.    The system is speed-sensitive, and will automatically engage the brake system    to stop the decoiler if a speed threshold is exceeded. The system also has an    'anti-bump' function that will automatically engage the brakes if any of the    controls on the remote-control unit are excessively moved or accidentally bumped.    The decoiler has a backup brake system comprising parallel cable clamps that    allow the operator to stop the system remotely if the primary systems fail on    both sides.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Two power packs    power the main wheels. These are internal combustion units that power hydraulic    pumps. Drive to the main wheels is via reduction gearboxes with chain drives    coupled to hydraulic motors. The wheels are radio-servo remote-controlled and    can be manoeuvred independently of each other. This allows the decoiler to be    steered left or right or even reversed.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The decoiler has    a maximum GVM of 8 t, is able to carry a load of 5 t, and can currently operate    on highwalls up to 500 m high.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The SmartBroom    was centrally mounted on the main shaft of the decoiler. Free rotation of this    shaft allows the SmartBroom to sweep surfaces at any angle as it engages with    the rock. The SmartBroom is fitted with a height control mechanism consisting    of an arm and wheel and hydraulic cylinder. The arm can be raised and lowered    to ensure that the brushes stay in contact with the rock surface. It also allows    the broom to be raised when negotiating obstacles.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The SmartBroom    itself consists of a hydraulically-driven heavy rotating shaft with 17 'brushes'    which are screwed into the shaft. The prototype has a heavy upper protective    steel shield with the lower half open to allow the brushes to engage with the    rock surfaces. The brushes are made of heavy cable, and for the tests 40 mm    diameter cable was used. Being consumable items, the cables can be changed and    replaced quickly. The system allows cables of various diameters, ranging from    20 mm to 100 mm, to be fitted, depending on the contact energy and stiffness    of brush required for dislodging and moving rocks of various sizes.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The smaller diameter    brushes are more flexible and will impart relatively low energy levels on the    face compared to the larger diameter brushes, which are stiffer and will impart    relatively high energy levels onto the rock surface and loose rocks. The decision    on which energy level to use on a particular face will be site-specific, and    will take into account rock mass strength, amount of time-dependent deterioration,    geometry and orientation of geological structures, and fracture frequency.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The SmartBroom    can rotate both forwards and backwards.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Summary specification    of the SmartBroom:</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>Broom dimensions:</i></font></p>     <blockquote>        <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/set.jpg" align="absmiddle">      Width:&nbsp;2350 mm</font></p>       <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/set.jpg" align="absmiddle">      Diameter:&nbsp;1950 mm</font></p>       ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/set.jpg" align="absmiddle">      Weight:&nbsp;3000 kg</font></p> </blockquote>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>Hydraulic requirements</i></font></p>     <blockquote>        <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/set.jpg" align="absmiddle">      Max hydraulic pressure:&nbsp;700 bar</font></p>       <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/set.jpg" align="absmiddle">      Hydraulic control: Proportional remote control</font></p>       <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/set.jpg" align="absmiddle">      Max torque broom shaft:&nbsp;1900 Nm</font></p> </blockquote>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>Properties of    the 40 mm diameter cable brushes usedfor prototype:</i></font></p>     <blockquote>        <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/set.jpg" align="absmiddle">      Max Bristle Head Speed:&nbsp;42 m/s</font></p>       <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/set.jpg" align="absmiddle">      Broom element lock-off torque on shaft 1050 Nm</font></p>       ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/set.jpg" align="absmiddle">      Broom element weight:&nbsp;9.8 kg</font></p>       <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/set.jpg" align="absmiddle">      No. of brushes:&nbsp;17</font></p> </blockquote>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The prototype SmartBroom    fitted with 40 mm diameter cable brushes is illustrated in <a href="#f2">Figure    2</a>.</font></p>     <p><a name="f2"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/13f02.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>Test site</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The tests were    conducted in the Lafarge Ridgeview quarry in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal from 7-10    February 2012. The test site covered the immediate horizontal and vertical sections    of the pit crest (<a href="#f3">Figure 3</a>).The rock type was slightly-weathered    to unweathered Dwyka tillite with a rock quality designation (RQD) of 65 per    cent, classifying the rock quality as 'fair'. The RQD was calculated based on    a 'virtual drill core' being taken over a 5 m horizontal stretch of open rock    face. The estimated rock strength using the ISRM, 1981 classification is 'very    strong rock', UCS 100-250 MPa.</font></p>     <p><a name="f3"></a></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/13f03.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Bertoe Meyer, the    lead designer of both the decoiler and SmartBroom, and his team from Wepex conducted    the tests. The tests were monitored by Dave van Rensburg, chief rock engineer    from Mogalakwena, who was in attendance throughout, while Louis Melis from Melis    and Du Plessis, was in attendance for the crest brooming part of the trials.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b><i>Test results</i></b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The first part    of the trials comprised a flat test section away from the crest, in which rocks    ranging up to about 0.25 m<sup>3</sup> (i.e. up to about 600 kg were placed    in front of the SmartBroom, and brushed along the horizontal surface (<a href="#f4">Figure    4</a>).</font></p>     <p><a name="f4"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/13f04.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The results obtained    were very encouraging. The SmartBroom managed to effectively sweep all the rocks    placed in its path (<a href="#f5">Figure 5</a>). The largest rock, which had    a mass of 600 kg, was moved 2 m in a time of 3 minutes.</font></p>     <p><a name="f5"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/13f05.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The second part    of the trial comprised a test to sweep a 7 m horizontal section back from the    crest edge. The purpose of this test was to obtain an understanding of the degree    of cleaning and dislodgement of partially-wedged rocks, that could be brushed    away. The results exceeded expectations, as a virtually clean surface free of    any rock fragments was produced within 2 minutes. This is clearly illustrated    in <a href="#f6">Figure 6</a>, where the bottom half of the plate illustrates    the swept section, with the crest edge to the left, and the unswept section    in the top half of the plate.</font></p>     <p><a name="f6"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/13f06.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The third and final    part of the trial comprised brushing the 5 m vertical face below the crest.    To assist in evaluating the effectiveness of the SmartBroom, the face was marked    with continuous white lines and all high-risk rocks/areas were individually    marked, as may be seen in <a href="#f7">Figure 7</a>.</font></p>     <p><a name="f7"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/13f07.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">This part of the    trial was not as successful as the initial two tests, as there were problems    in controlling the lowering of the decoiler over the crest of the highwall due    to the sudden take-up of slack in the temporary anchorage behind the crest.    As a result, the decoiler started slipping and only the uppermost part of the    vertical crest edge was brushed for any length of time before the decoiler started    accelerating downslope. In <a href="#f8">Figure 8</a>, the same areas as indicated    in <a href="#f7">Figure 7</a> can be compared, showing clearly that the rocks    and debris near the crest were very effectively removed. The SmartBroom also    managed to reach areas up to 700 mm behind the average crest line, demonstrating    that the intact rock profile was very effectively followed on a relatively uneven    edge. This achievement would, however, vary according to the length of the cable    brushes employed and the rock face characteristics of different sites.</font></p>     <p><a name="f8"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/13f08.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Although the SmartBroom    did not engage with the surface long enough to brush down the lower section    of the wall adequately, a surprisingly large amount of rock debris was removed    during the short time that it had engaged. It was also interesting to note that    some of the rocks that were not removed (indicated with blue arrows) showed    clear impact markings from the brushes, indicating that they were attached firmly    to the rock face. Longer sweeping times, or brushes of larger diameter imparting    higher energies, would have to be applied to dislodge them—these are all variables    that can be designed and fine-tuned for each highwall or part thereof.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The overall view    of the decoiler and the SmartBroom with the brushed crest edge are shown in    <a href="#f9">Figure 9</a>.</font></p>     <p><a name="f9"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/13f09.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>Conclusions    and way forward</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Rockfall hazards    in the open pit environment pose a significant risk to personnel and equipment.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">In spite of Mogalakwena    Platinum Mine adopting a proactive approach in managing and reducing the risk    associated with rockfall, rockfall risk is still highlighted as a major focus    in the mine's safety, health, and environmental policy.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Although the measures    introduced at Mogalakwena to combat rockfall are very effective, they do place    constraints and limitations on the mining activity and overall highwall stability    monitoring.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The prototype of    the remote-controlled SmartBroom has provided, for the first time, an effective    method of significantly reducing the rockfall risk in open-pit mines worldwide,    by being able to safely scale highwalls of any height.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Although not advocated    as a standalone rockfall mitigation option <i>per se,</i> the SmartBroom may    very well be all that is required in many situations. Even so, scaling and removal    of loose rock, prior to the installation of conventional rockfall mitigation    measures such as drape meshes and catch fences, can greatly reduce their maintenance    cost and life span. The SmartBroom will further allow the catchment berms on    existing long-standing highwalls that have become choked with rock debris to    be cleaned out and rehabilitated to the same level of service and functionality    as they were initially designed for.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">This technological    innovation, when fully developed, will contribute enormously to the goal of    making open-pit mines a safe working environment.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Following the success    achieved with the prototype, Wepex will now proceed with the final design and    manufacture of the production units. The main elements that need to be addressed,    and for which concepts have already been indentified, will be:</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/set.jpg" align="absmiddle">    An all-terrain remote-controlled carrier unit that will remain stable and controllable    on all surfaces at any angle, and that can traverse all terrains and large obstacles,    including rock-strewn berms</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/set.jpg" align="absmiddle">    The need for being able to achieve purchase on the near-vertical faces and even    overhangs as the unit traverses downslope, to ensure maximum engagement of the    broom with the rock surface at all times</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/set.jpg" align="absmiddle">    Optimal brush diameter and length combinations, together with speed and power    of the unit to achieve various energy ratings as applicable for different conditions    and applications. This will also include optimizing the number and configuration    of the attachment points of the brushes on the rotating shaft. These energy    ratings and configurations could eventually be matched to rockmass rating systems    used in open-pit design</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/set.jpg" align="absmiddle">    Additional and alternative design of the brooming mechanism as may be more effective    in certain applications. This will apply in particular to irregular and highly-broken    faces</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n8/set.jpg" align="absmiddle">    The addition of remotely-operated tools on the decoiler platform, which could    be used either as part of the brooming exercise or for other applications such    as remote-controlled drilling and anchoring on the highwall as might be required.</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>Acknowledgements</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The authors would    like to acknowledge the lead designer, Bertoe Meyer from Wepex, for the creation    of this innovative technology, which will revolutionize open-pit highwall safety.    To the management of the Lafarge Ridgeview quarry, thank you for providing the    test site, and thanks to the management of Mogalakwena Platinum Mine for permission    to publish this paper.</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">&copy; The Southern    African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2012.ISSN2225-6253. This paper was    first presented at the, Southern Hemisphere International Rock Mechanics Symposium    (SHIRMS) 2012, 15-17 May 2012, Sun City, South Africa.</font></p>      ]]></body>
<REFERENCES></REFERENCES
</article>
