<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0038-223X</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0038-223X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0038-223X2012000700008</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[High pressure grinding moving ahead in copper, iron, and gold processing]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[van der Meer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maphosa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Humbolt Wedag GmbH  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Germany</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Weir Minerals Africa (Pty) Ltd  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2012</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2012</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>112</volume>
<numero>7</numero>
<fpage>637</fpage>
<lpage>647</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0038-223X2012000700008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0038-223X2012000700008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0038-223X2012000700008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[High pressure grinding roll (HPGR) technology is used in an increasingly diverse range of applications, predominantly iron ore , gold and diamonds. KHD Humboldt Wedag HPGRs are applied world-wide, and consistently prove to be well designed and reliable operating units, with their performance meeting the pre-set standards. This publication summarizes some of the features and experiences for recent applications in treatment of copper ore, coarse iron ore, and gold ore. Summary data of roll surface wear life and operating data are given, together with operational observations. In addition, effects of feed segregation and truncated feed are discussed, as well as the implications of a product recycle flow sheet.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[HPGR]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[KHD]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[stud lining]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[HPGR grinding]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[partial product recycle]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[feed segregation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[truncated feed]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p align="right"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b>JOURNAL    PAPER</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="4"><b><a name="top"></a>High    pressure grinding moving ahead in copper, iron, and gold processing</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b>F.P. van der    Meer<sup>I</sup>; W. Maphosa<sup>II</sup></b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><sup>I</sup>Humbolt    Wedag GmbH, Cologne, Germany    <br>   <sup>II</sup>Weir Minerals Africa (Pty) Ltd</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <hr size="1" noshade>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b>SYNOPSIS</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">High pressure grinding    roll (HPGR) technology is used in an increasingly diverse range of applications,    predominantly iron ore , gold and diamonds. KHD Humboldt Wedag HPGRs are applied    world-wide, and consistently prove to be well designed and reliable operating    units, with their performance meeting the pre-set standards. This publication    summarizes some of the features and experiences for recent applications in treatment    of copper ore, coarse iron ore, and gold ore. Summary data of roll surface wear    life and operating data are given, together with operational observations. In    addition, effects of feed segregation and truncated feed are discussed, as well    as the implications of a product recycle flow sheet.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b>Keywords:</b>    HPGR, KHD, stud lining, HPGR grinding, partial product recycle, feed segregation,    truncated feed, truncation.</font></p> <hr size="1" noshade>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>Introduction</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">High pressure grinding    rolls (HPGRs, also known as roller presses) are becoming well accepted for coarse,    abrasive, and hard rock applications. When the first HPGR for coarse ore was    commissioned at Los Colorados in 1998, there were only 14 HPGRs installed in    the minerals industry, mainly for grinding pellet feed to increase the Blaine    value (Van der Meer <i>et al.,</i> 1997), and only three KHD HPGR units were    applied for crushing coarse ore. Nowadays, well over 100 HPGRs have been or    are being installed in ore processing applications, and this number is expected    to grow rapidly in the years to come.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The Los Colorados    plant of CMH in Chile was the first successful operation in which an HPGR was    used to replace a conventional tertiary and quaternary crusher. At that time    HPGR technology was considered new to this type of installation, and extensive    test work and studies were conducted to support the plant design. The grinding    circuit was designed to include primary gyratory crushing, secondary cone crushing,    and a Humboldt Wedag HPGR Type RP 16-170/180 (roll diameter 1.7 m, roll width    1.8 m) in place of a tertiary crusher operating in closed circuit, with vibrating    screens to recycle the oversize +7 mm fraction back to the HPGR circuit. The    7 mm undersize is fed to dry magnetic separation. The capacity of the HPGR is    about 2 000 t/h.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Vasilkovka Gold    Mining in northern Kazakhstan is the site of one of the recent applications    in gold ore treatment. The ore has a high concentration of copper, which significantly    complicates gold extraction. The Vasilkovskoye mine is estimated to contain    400 t of gold. In this gold plant, two Humboldt Wedag HPGRs Type RP 16-170/180    (roll diameter 1.7 m, roll width 1.8 m) have been operating in parallel since    2009, each in closed circuit with a partial product recycle, at a capacity of    about 1200-1400 t/h.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">At the Nurkazgan    copper plant of Kazachmyss, Kazakhstan, two HPGR units Type RP 13-170/140 (roll    diameter 1.7 m, roll width 1.4 m) are operating in series, each in closed circuit    with a partial product recycle and a closing 5 mm aperture screening. The units    effectively perform the duties of tertiary and quaternary crushing stages, and    were commissioned at the end of 2007. The units have a capacity of about 900    t/h, at a product recycle of approximately 75-125 per cent (effective recycle    mass in proportion to fresh feed) for an initial feed top size of 35 mm. Ultimate    product size is 80% &lt; 0.8 mm, with up to 60% &lt; 74 (im, at a specific power    consumption of 1.8 to 2.2 kWh/t.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>Los Colorados    operation iron ore</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The crushing and    pre-concentration plant is located near the mine. After rail transport to the    pellet plant, the magnetic pre-concentrate is ground in ball mills to pellet    feed fineness and further concentrated by wet magnetic separation. <a href="#f1">Figure    1</a> shows a schematic flow sheet of the Los Colorados HPGR circuit.</font></p>     <p><a name="f1"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n7/08f01.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>Operating experience    at Los Colorados</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The positive findings    and downstream benefits observed in pilot testing paved the way for a successful    installation of a HPGR at the Los Colorados plant (<a href="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n7/08t01.jpg">Table    I</a>), with the confidence that the unit would meet expectations in full scale    industrial operation.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The Los Colorados    Huasco pellet plant reported lower energy consumption in wet ball milling, as    well as reduced circulating load in the mill circuits, due to a finer feed and    improved Bond Ball Mill work index. The existing ball mill capacity could be    increased by 30 per cent.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>Wear life</i></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Based on test results,    the wear life was guaranteed at 12 000 hours initially. The roll surface, as    main wear component, met the guaranteed wear life right from the beginning.    This was possible because of good compaction of the ore on the stud-lined surface.    The quartz content was about 15 per cent during pilot testing and today varies    between 15-30 per cent, depending on ore type. Three factors affect wear the    most: quartz content, operating pressure, and quality of compaction of the autogenous    wear layer between the studs on the roll surface (<a href="#f2">Figure 2</a>).    Of these, formation of a competent autogenous layer can make a huge difference    in achievable wear life (Dunne <i>et al.,</i> 2004). For example, when treating    taconite material (excess pebbles from a fully autogenous mill circuit) at Cleveland    Cliffs' Empire Mine a wear life of up to 17 000 hours was achieved, even though    the machine was operated at a high specific pressure of 4.5-5.0 N/mm<sup>2</sup>    and the quartz content of the ore averaged near 37 per cent (Rose <i>et al.,</i>    2002; Dowling <i>et al.,</i> 2001; Maxton <i>et al.,</i> 2006).</font></p>     <p><a name="f2"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n7/08f02.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Obviously, the    roll surfaces are the most critical parts of the HPGR, in terms of performance    and investment. An accurate prediction of wear life of the roll surface during    operation is essential, since this is the single largest factor that determines    operating cost. It can determine whether a project is viable or not. Each manufacturer    has developed its own in-house wear rate test suitable for its proprietary surface.    The Humboldt Wedag wear rate tests were developed over the past decade. The    result of this test is a wear rate index that is correlated to operating data    of the Humboldt Wedag units in minerals operations. The test provides an accurate    and reliable specification of wear rate data as basis for process guarantees    for minerals applications.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Wear increases    with pressure, thus reducing operating pressure would lead to a longer roll    surface wear life. Pilot testing determines how product size is affected by    operating pressure, and provides a basis to balance between operating pressure    and power consumption, generation of fines, and wear rate. There generally is    a level above which additional pressure results in excessive energy consumption,    and a disproportional increase in the generated fines (Van der Meer <i>et al.,</i>    2008). This is attributed to a lower incremental size reduction from a denser    particle bed and higher relative proportion of fines within the bed. At Los    Colorados it was observed that a decrease in pressure resulted in only a small    increase in circulating load. Overall, operating at lower pressure than initially    commissioned (2.5-3.0 N/mitf instead of 4.0-4.4 N/mm2) proved to be advantageous,    especially when considering the overall energy consumption of the HPGR circuit.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">During the life    of a set of tyres, wear measurements are taken periodically at, say, 2 month    or longer intervals. <a href="#f3">Figure 3</a> shows the typical wear profile    for coarse ore operations. This illustrates the progress of wear of surface    expressed in millimetres of depth over the width of the roll. A total of 58    positions were measured, on four locations over the rolls' circumference (at    0&deg;, 90&deg;, 180&deg;, and 270&deg;). Eight measurement series are shown;    one baseline of the new roll surface after installation, and one series each    for 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 10 months of operation. The measurements indicate a moderate    wear over 10 months of operation, in a pattern that is specific for the CMH    coarse ore operation (other ores may show a different pattern, such as a 'bathtub'    profile).</font></p>     <p><a name="f3"></a></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n7/08f03.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The end of the    useful life for the rolls in the above example would be reached at about 25-30    mm wear, still some months away.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">As shown in <a href="#f4">Figure    3</a>, the shoulders of the rolls started wearing faster after two months of    operation, and over the subsequent eight months. This higher wear leads to an    uneven gap and lower pressure at the sides of the roll, where the material is    crushed less efficiently and may even partly bypass the rolls.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Eventually, a situation    is reached where local wear increases due to the abrasive action of material    bypassing the rolls at the edges. To overcome this problem for the next set    of rolls (after wearing-out the existing ones), Humboldt</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Wedag introduced    a stud pattern with a modified distribution of stud hardness over the roll width,    with harder studs nearer to the edges and harder lateral studs (which facilitate    embedding an autogenous wear layer all the way up to the rim of the rolls).    Such a continuing improvement of the roll surface design leads to a prolonged    roll surface wear life. An example of improvement between roll set #2 and roll    set #3 is show in <a href="#f4">Figure 4</a>. This illustrates that for a wear    of 16 mm on the studs, roll set #3 could treat 3 Mt of additional ore (Barrera,    2005). In total the studs can wear at around 40 mm.</font></p>     <p><a name="f4"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n7/08f04.jpg"></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Measures such as    described above led to an increase in wear life at Los Colorados, which today    is reported to be at about 14 600 hours.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>Availability</i></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">When designing    a HPGR circuit, matching capacity and availability with upstream and downstream    crushing and grinding equipment is essential. The capacity of a HPGR can be    varied by applying variable speed drives, as throughput is generally more or    less proportional to roll speed.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The improvements,    modifications, and increase in experience on part of the maintenance crew at    Los Colorados resulted in an availability of well over 97 per cent. This correlates    with the Humboldt Wedag HPGR installed at Argyle Diamonds, Australia where the    availability over the last seven years is reported to be around 96 per cent    (Maxton <i>et al.</i> 2002, Gerrard <i>et al.,</i> 2004).</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">In coarse ore operations,    care has to be taken in the design of the materials handling facilities around    the HPGR circuit in order not to create bottlenecks that would have a negative    effect on HPGR performance. Adequate tramp metal protection as well as appropriate    feed bin capacities ahead of the HPGR are prerequisites to ensure uninterrupted    choke-fed conditions at all times. A proper protection against tramp metal in    the feed, both by a self-cleaning magnet above the belt conveyor feeding the    HPGR and a metal detector, must be installed. The metal detector system, as    a safeguard against non-magnetic metal components, must provide a fast response    to activate a tramp metal rejection system. Various systems are available, including    some that can be operated reliably with iron ore. The best arrangement involves    metal detection immediately in front of the HPGR feed bin. The design may be    such that the metal detector activates a bypass flap gate that diverts the metal-containing    portion of the feed stream to a chute or to a separate bin.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Minimizing downtime    during roll changes would require two complete roller assemblies of a shaft    with tyre and bearings, each of which is a long-delivery item. The exchange    procedure then becomes a simple matter of opening the frame, extracting the    worn set and installing the new one (as shown in <a href="#f5">Figure 5</a>    for a current design unit). Depending on site conditions the time required is    approximately 24 to 36 hours (Maxton <i>et al.,</i> 2005, 2006). The worn set    is then refurbished off-line and serves as ready emergency spare in case of    accidental failure.</font></p>     <p><a name="f5"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n7/08f05.jpg"></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">A standard supply    of parts for commissioning and operation is generally provided with the machine.    However, minimizing the capital locked up in critical or strategic spares, while    still ensuring an operational continuity, may differ for each individual mine    site. For Los Colorados a complete set of spare roller assemblies was purchased    with the machine, and the bearings and shafts of these have been operating successfully    since 1998. It should be noted that no premature bearing, shaft, or tyre failure    has ever occurred at the Los Colorados operation, or at any Humboldt Wedag HPGR    in a minerals application overall. To a large part this is the success of the    closed-circuit oil lubrication system and the patented support concept utilizing    a rubber pad to distribute the forces evenly onto the whole bearing.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>Influence of    HPGR on downstream processes</i></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The positive influence    on wet ball milling demonstrated in testing was also observed in full scale    operation. For example, in ball milling a 27-44 per cent increase in capacity    from about 203 t/h to between 254 t/h and 295 t/h was obtained, depending on    ore type, for the same applied energy consumption of 4 MW, when grinding HPGR    material to a ball mill product of 80 per cent passing 44 (im (Westermeyer <i>et    al.,</i> 2000; Gallardo, 2007). This was attributed to both a higher fines content    and the generation of microcracks in the particles. The Bond Ball Mill Work    Index reduced from 11 kWh/t to between 8 kWh/t and 9 kWh/t, depending on the    HPGR pressure applied.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">In magnetic separation,    a higher quality pre-concentrate at constant yield was achieved. Both of these    effects can be attributed to the same two factors: the generation of more fines    and the generation of microcracks. The amount of &lt; 150 (im material produced    in the HPGR grinding stage was twice as high as what cone crushing would have    produced.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Variations in HPGR    product particle size distribution also led to side effects in other areas of    plant performance. Due to the higher fines content the angle of repose was enhanced    by 6 per cent. Consequently, the capacity of stockyards and material handling    systems was increased as well.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The particle shape    after grinding in the HPGR is somewhat more irregular compared with cone crusher    products. This should be considered when designing the screen in a HPGR circuit    to ensure sufficient screening efficiency and to avoid excessive moisture carry-over    in the oversize of wet screening applications. The influence of feed moisture    content on HPGR operation will be discussed in more detail in subsequent paragraphs.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>Disagglomeration</i></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">An HPGR can be    used effectively in place of tertiary crushers for preparing a suitable ball    mill feed. This can be accomplished either by operating the HPGR in open circuit,    in closed circuit with edge recirculation, or by operating in closed circuit    with dry or wet screening. Each circuit configuration has its own benefits and    drawbacks (Van der Meer and Dicke, 2008). Due to the high pressure applied by    HPGR, the material is discharged partially as a compacted agglomerate (called    flakes or cake), which may fall apart easily, but also may require further disagglomeration.    When a screening circuit is considered, the proportion and strength of the flakes    will influence the screening efficiency and circulating load.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The strength of    flakes is ore-specific, and is also influenced by e.g. feed moisture, clay content,    and operating pressure. So as to be able to evaluate flake strength and predict    disagglomeration requirements, flake strength tests and disagglomeration tests    were developed by Humboldt Wedag in conjunction with the Los Colorados project.    At present, these tests are standard procedure included in pilot test programmes    at Humboldt Wedag's laboratories.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">At Los Colorados    the decision was made to install two disagglomerators to ensure high dry screening    efficiency, since testing had shown compact flakes. However, with changes in    ore type and increasingly dry feed material the flakes became more brittle and    were observed to fall apart readily upon material transfer and dry screening.    The disagglomerators were thus decommissioned.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">With the operating    experience from Los Colorados the standard flake test and its relation to plant    data was greatly improved. When CMP installed another HPGR at their El Romeral    Plant utilizing the same circuit layout as Los Colorados, standard flake tests    were carried out and the results suggested that a mild disagglomeration step    would be required. With the advice of Humboldt Wedag, the client designed a    belt transfer point, consisting of a tower with internal baffle plates, to break    the flakes and ensure in this simple way sufficient screening efficiency (<a href="#f6">Figure    6</a>).</font></p>     <p><a name="f6"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n7/08f06.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">When (wet) screening    is used in the HPGR circuit the issue of flake strength may become more severe.    Flakes or flake fragments may survive breakage during transport, and a large    proportion may also survive the screening stage unbroken, thus significantly    reducing screening efficiency and contributing to an increased circulating load.    Moreover, when oversize material from wet screening is recycled back to the    HPGR, the contribution to higher moisture content in the HPGR feed may lead    to difficulties in material flow in and out of the HPGR feed bins, extrusion    during compression, and generally may contribute to a deteriorating performance    of the HPGR. Testing for flake competency and moisture effects thus is of importance,    and these findings should be taken into consideration when designing the (wet)    screening circuit.</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>Vasilkovka operation—gold    ore</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The Vasilkovsky    region is one of world's largest gold fields and the site of the largest gold    deposit in Central Asia. It is located in Akmola Oblast in north-eastern Kazakhstan    and has been producing gold for more than 30 years. Vasilkov Gold JV (Vasgold    GOK) is developing this deposit, which has an estimated total gold reserve in    excess of 400 t, and is the operating company under the umbrella of KazZinc.    KazZinc is a major producer of copper, precious metals, zinc, and lead, with    some 21 000 people in mining, ore dressing, metallurgy, power generation, and    mechanical production. The company was established in 1997 through the merger    of Eastern Kazakhstan's three main non-ferrous metals companies.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Vasgold has recently    commissioned a new mine and processing plant, for a capacity of about 9 Mt of    ore per year. The Vasilkovka plant treats a complex ore, where the gold is present    as free gold, as inclusions to and in sulphide minerals, and as refractory gold.    The plant incorporates a complex flow sheet including gravity separation, fine    grinding, and a number of new technologies, such as Leachox intensive leaching    (Flatman <i>et al.,</i> 2010), stirred mills for ultrafine grinding, and HPGR    as the third crushing stage, ahead of ball milling.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">HPGRs proved to    be attractive as the final crushing stage due to their large unit capacity (design    over 1 400 t/h per unit), fine crushing performance, low specific energy (Gerrard    <i>et al.,</i> 2004), and additional advantages in gold liberation. The current    application of HPGRs at VasGold is to provide a final crushing stage and increase    ball mill throughput by providing a mill feed at a reduced grindability and    a high fines content, as a feasible alternative to SABC circuits (Maxton, Morley,    and Bearman, 2003.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b><i>Operating    Experience at Vasilkovka</i></b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Steered by the    above performance indicators, KHD Humboldt Wedag was contracted for the supply    of two HPGR RPS 16170/180 units for the tertiary crushing stage. The units are    operating in parallel, in closed circuit with a partial product recirculation    (<a href="#f7">Figure 7</a>). The machines each process 1 500 t/h (HPGR effective    feed rate), generating a product of 80% &lt; 5 mm from a 40-50 mm top size feed    (<a href="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n7/08t02.jpg">Table II</a>).</font></p>     <p><a name="f7"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n7/08f07.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The circuit does    involve recirculation of a part of the HPGR discharge, at a recirculation ratio    of up to 180 per cent (recycled material in proportion of fresh feed).</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b><i>Circuit design    with partial product recycle</i></b></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Depending on the    application, a variety of arrangements can be applied for HPGR circuits. This    is a result of the inherent process of HPGR grinding, where the size reduction    takes place in a particle bed, as disintegration of ore particles through interparticle    crushing in the bed created between the rolls. In contrast, conventional crushers    rely on single particle breakage for size reduction, as a contact crushing between    grinding media (rods, balls, jaw crusher, or cone compartment surface). Thus,    in HPGR crushing the particle to be crushed can be, and preferably should be,    smaller than the applied operating gap.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">One direct effect    is that the crushed particles can be recycled through the same HPGR unit, either    directly, or after classification, or after intermediate beneficiation. In conventional    crushing, this would require a subsequent separate crushing stage in a unit    or in multiple units with a smaller gap setting (tertiary and quaternary crushers),    or rod mills.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">In an HPGR unit,    fresh feed with a top size of, for instance, 40 mm could be combined with a    recycle stream of crushed material of near 5 mm from a product recycle arrangement    without classification, and still be subjected to a very effective grinding    at an operating gap of about 35 mm (Van Der Meer and Gruendken, 2008). This    does save in additional screening facilities, and still allows for a fine feed    suitable for subsequent ball milling.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">At Vasilkovka,    the latter approach is successfully applied. This is achieved by installing    a product splitter following the HPGR, allowing for a partitioning of the product    material. The edge material (the relatively coarse material generated at the    left and right shoulders of the rolls (<a href="#f8">Figure 8</a>) and a portion    of the centre material are split out by mechanical cutters and returned to the    HPGR feed conveyor for re-crushing. This recycle mass also smoothes out any    feed fluctuations. The centre portion from the rolls discharge, which contains    the finer and more compressed material, is cut out by the splitter and forms    the final HPGR product. Obviously, a different arrangement (such as splitting    the full HPGR discharge stream after mixing of the centre and edge material)    could be applied as well.</font></p>     <p><a name="f8"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n7/08f08.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The application    of a product splitter arrangement is a feasible arrangement, but relies to a    large extend on a strict control of the feed rate to the roller press. At Vasilkovka    the filling of the pre-bin, to provide choke feed conditions, was warranted    by an adequate arrangement of a steady and uninterrupted feed supply from the    intermediate feed bin by installation of variable-speed vibratory feeders and    a short variable-speed conveyor belt. It was recognized that no short reaction    control could be applied to the return flow (approximately 912 t/h) of splitter    product, and that the major control available comes from control of the crushed    feed supply (approximately 530 t/h). The belt conveyor from the intermediate    bin has a relatively short retention time (&lt; 10 seconds), which thus does    allow for an adequate control and response time over the filling level of the    pre-bin.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>Flakes</i></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">One of the phenomena    that take place during compression in a HPGR is the generation of compacted    material in the HPGR product. This compacted material, also referred to as 'flakes',    is generated by a the high compressing force on the bed of particles in the    gap between the rolls, causing part of the ground product to discharge in the    form of cake-like briquettes (<a href="#f9">Figure 9</a>).</font></p>     <p><a name="f9"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n7/08f09.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Thus the HPGR product    often is composed of a mixture of loose product and a proportion of flakes and    flake fragments, the latter ranging from 0 per cent to 80 per cent by volume,    depending on ore, particle size, moisture content, and pressing conditions.    At Vasilkovka, the proportion of flakes in the centre product was modest; some    10-20 per cent by volume (<a href="#f10">Figure 10</a>). Also, the flakes proved    to be relatively brittle, and partly fell apart on handling and transfer (on    belt conveyors, transfer points, and bins).</font></p>     <p><a name="f10"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n7/08f10.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">A series of standard    tests for flake competency was carried out during confirmation testing. These    flake competency tests are based on the disintegration of flakes in a tumbling    mill, and return a so-called 'tumbling factor' on a scale of zero to 100 per    cent, in which zero represents very hard flakes and 100 per cent indicates total    disintegration of the flakes. The flakes generated at Vasilkovka scored near    70 per cent.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">As the downstream    process does not include classification, but only product splitting, with the    final product being directed to the ball mill (sump), it is seen that the flakes    at the indicated strength do not pose any problems and no disagglomeration stage    is required to assure optimum product handling. The flake material disintegrates    almost instantly when entering the mill or a pump sump ahead of a hydrocyclone    cluster. This was one more reason to apply a product recycle arrangement for    Vasilkovka, as disagglom-eration ahead of an eventual screening did was shown    to be a less attractive alternative.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b><i>Wear life</i></b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">As with the Los    Colorados unit, wear measurements are taken periodically during the life of    a set of tyres. <a href="#f11">Figure 11</a> shows the typical wear profile    for one of the rolls after operation of 10 months. This illustrates the progress    of wear of surface expressed in millimetres of depth over the width of the roll.    A total of 58 positions were measured, on four locations over the rolls circumference    (at 0&deg;, 90&deg;, 180&deg;, and 270&deg;). The measurements indicate a low    wear over 10 months of operation, in a pattern that is specific for the VasGold    coarse ore operation (<a href="#f11">Figure 11</a>). The end of the useful life    for the rolls in the above example would be reached at about 30 mm wear, still    some 10-12 months away at the time of measurement.</font></p>     <p><a name="f11"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n7/08f11.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The shoulders of    the rolls were wearing slower, leading to the roll edges standing higher. These    would need to be ground off to avoid the roll surfaces touching at the edges,    and to maintain an optimum operating gap. In future roll sets, the roll edges    will be designed with a softer stud quality to avoid this type of uneven wear.    Measures such as described above led to an increase in wear life at VasGold,    which today is expected to increase to about 12 000 hours.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b><i>Feed presentation    and segregation</i></b></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">In all cases where    coarse ores are processed, but particularly in cases where a significant circulating    load is maintained, a strong emphasis and attention must be given to a proper    layout in the feed system upstream of the HPGR. An ill-designed bin and conveyor    system may rapidly lead to feed size segregation on conveyor belts and in bins.    In such a case, arranging the feed belt discharge lengthwise to the rolls' axis    promotes particle size segregation in the HGPR feed bin. Size segregation in    the feed bin invariably results in improper material particle size distribution    across the width of the rolls, such as coarse feed on one side and fine feed    on the other. With most crusher types (cone crushers, impact crushers) or ball    mills this is of much less significance, but for HPGRs this may lead to an uneven    wear of the roll surface, an impaired size reduction, and roll skewing.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">As an example of    a condition where a pronounced particle size segregation was present (<a href="#f12">Figure    12</a>), a particle size analysis for the right side of the a conveyor belt    indicated 40% &gt; 20 mm, with 30% &lt; 5 mm, whereas the left side showed a    much finer composition of only 10% &gt; 20 mm, with 50% &lt; 5 mm (<a href="#f13">Figure    13</a>).</font></p>     <p><a name="f12"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n7/08f12.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><a name="f13"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n7/08f13.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Such feed segregation    results in uneven process conditions and roll skewing (a condition where the    rolls are not parallel to each other, but form a wedged gap opening across the    width of the rolls). Although an automated control system is in place to correct    temporary skewing, a structural feed segregation does generate a difference    in operating pressure, material packing, and gap opening over the width of the    rolls. These led to operation away from the specifications, with a coarser product    (from lower-than-required specific pressure and a wider operating gap), a lower    throughput, and an irregular operation. Moreover, aggravated by uneven nipping    conditions, an uneven static pressure from the feed chute above, and relatively    high particle mobility, uneven local wear results, leading to a significant    reduction in operating life of the rolls' surface and thus higher operating    cost.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">At Vasilkovka,    the feed system includes four vibratory feeders from the holding bunkers, and    a recycle of the splitter product from the HPGR discharge, which is loaded on    top of the layer of feed mass on the conveyor. The throw of the four feeders    was carefully aligned, and a system to ensure an even distribution of the returned    fines over the fresh feed was designed to avoid segregation of coarse and fine    material.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The filling of    the HPGR feed chute was arranged perpendicular to the rolls' axis. Additional    baffle plates may be built into the feed bin to enhance proper mixing.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Plant operators    have reported that particularly at low feed rate conditions (at maintained roll    speed), at low feed bin levels, an imbalanced feed supply and distribution over    the rolls occured, promoting a skewed situation, leading to material bypass    or coarse material from incomplete compression grinding. A smaller-than-desired    operating gap implied a very low effective pressure, and a low grinding efficiency.    <a href="#f14">Figure 14</a> shows the KHD hydraulic system designed to control    roll skewing and distribute the forces equally on the cylindrical roller bearings.</font></p>     <p><a name="f14"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n7/08f14.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><a href="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n7/08t03.jpg">Table    3</a></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">One of the main    functions of the KHD control system is to maintain a parallel gap, especially    in the more difficult-to-grind coarse and hard rock applications (Maxton and    Van Der Meer, 2005; Maxton, Van Der Meer, and Gruendken, 2006).</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>Nurkazgan operation—copper    ore</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">At the Nurkazgan    copper plant of Kazachmyss, Kazakhstan, two HPGR units are operating in closed    circuit with product recycle. The units effectively perform the duties of tertiary    and quaternary crushing stages, and were commissioned at the end of 2007 (<a href="#f15">Figure    15</a>).</font></p>     <p><a name="f15"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n7/08f15.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The units have    a capacity of 850-950 t/h, at a product recycle of approximately 75-125 per    cent (effective recycle mass in proportion to fresh feed) for an initial feed    top size of 35 mm. Ultimate product size is down to 80% &lt; 0.8 mm, with up    to 60% &lt; 74 i m, at a specific power consumption of 1 .8 to 2.2 kWh/t. Anticipated    roll wear life for Humboldt Wedag's Stud-Plus<sup>TM</sup> tyres is 8 000 operating    hours.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The HPGR centre    product is led over a scalping screen to break up any large agglomerates, and    is subsequently classified by hydrocyclones to remove the finished product at    about 95% &lt; 0.2 mm for flotation. The hydrocyclone overflow is further ground    in the primary ball mill (<a href="#f15">Figure 15</a>).</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The high proportion    of fines in the HPGR central discharge fractions, which stems from the high    circulating load over the product splitters, allows a significant proportion    of the ore to bypass the primary ball mill. In addition, the HPGR pre-ground    product does reflect a lower ball mill work index, and the energy input in ball    milling is reduced.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">At the time of    writing, a further evaluation of the process and effects of HPGR grinding for    the copper plant was being carried out. Where benefits from a high reduction    ratio and low energy input achieved by the HPGR units are being recognized,    the operation of the two-stage circuit is being reconsidered. Particularly the    effect of disagglomeration and wet screening after the first HPGR are subjects    of study.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Disagglomeration    of the compressed copper ore is a requirement for effective and efficient screening    at the 5 mm aperture employed. For this, the initial scrubber was replaced by    an impact crusher to avoid introduction of high moisture content in the screen    overflow returning to the second HPGR. This high moisture content was recognized    as cause for a less-than-optimum performance of the second-stage HPGR.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">As an intermediate    solution, Nurkazgan selected to run the HPGR circuit as a single-stage operation,    with both a partial product recycle and a product screening as-was, at 5 mm    aperture.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The screen oversize    is re-directed to blend in with the fresh feed, thus keeping the moisture content    of the effective</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">HPGR feed within    controllable and acceptable boundaries. This circuit is illustrated in <a href="#f16">Figure    16</a>.</font></p>     <p><a name="f16"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n7/08f16.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n7/08f17.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n7/08f18.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>Truncated feed</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">In some instances,    a proportion of fines can be removed from the final (HPGR) crushing stage feed    by screening, in an attempt to bypass the stage with already-finished material,    such as feed for the subsequent ball milling, or to avoid a further size reduction    and generation of ultra-fines from fines already present in the feed.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Depending on the    initial fines content in the feed, the product particle size for a truncated    feed in many cases is relatively similar (though slightly coarser) to that from    a full feed crushing. This implies that the size reduction from a truncated    feed might be more efficient, with a higher net fine product generation.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">This so-called    truncated feed, however, also generally results in a strongly reduced specific    throughput, as a lower bulk density and fewer fines to fill the void space between    the ore grains results in a decrease in specific throughput. There is a relationship    between the screen size used to prepare the feed and the specific throughput    of the HPGR, where the HPGR specific throughput drops by up to e.g. 35-40 per    cent with increasing screen size (the top size of the fines removed). This relationship    is illustrated in <a href="#f19">Figure 19</a>.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><a name="f19"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n7/08f19.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">As the quantity    of fines removed from the HPGR feed increases, the apparent trends in performance    are that the specific throughput of the HPGR drops due to the increase in void    space in the HPGR feed, with a resulting reduction in the operating gap. The    efficiency of the grinding increases, in terms of fine particle production.    In some cases, the overall HPGR product may become finer, and energy consumption    increases with increasing specific energy input and with a finer pre-HPGR screen    size.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The shifting balance    in a lower mass flow to the HPGR may in some cases make it possible to use smaller    equipment, even though a lower specific throughput is achieved, but may also    generate a more complex plant layout, with more conveying and screening. The    balance of possible advantages (smaller equipment, less ultra-fines) and disadvantages    (higher wear, more recycle and screening) must, however, be evaluated for each    plant design and ore situation.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">As a consequence    of the lower specific throughput, from a similar applied press force and overall    energy consumption, the net specific energy consumption generally increases,    in some instances by up to 50 per cent. In an overall assessment, the advantage    of reduced plant and equipment size that would be obtained by bypassing the    fines is frequently offset by the reduction in specific throughput and increase    in net specific energy consumption. These effects often result in similar required    HPGR dimensions and therefore, to compensate for the lower specific throughput,    the rolls sometimes have to be operated at a higher peripheral speed, which    would increase roll surface wear. In addition, a truncated feed generally generates    a less strong 'autogenous wear layer', where the relatively coarse fragments    tend to break away the coating on the roll surface. This also increases the    roll surface wear rate. Thus operating cost (from a more frequent replacement    of worn grinding rolls) may increase for a truncated feed.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Overall, the balance    for justification of a truncated circuit is determined mainly by the effects    of a truncated feed on the reduction of mass flow to the HPGR (proportion of    fines in the HPGR section feed), the additional requirements in conveying and    screening, the reduced specific throughput and increase in specific energy,    and the anticipated increase in roll surface wear rate.</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>Conclusions</b></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Installation and    commissioning of HPGRs in coarse iron ore, gold, and copper processing plants    was concluded successfully, with the 1.7 m diameter KHD Humboldt Wedag HPGR    units performing well on specification. The HPGR product recycle arrangement    provides a means for size reduction of the feed material without requirement    of a screening facility.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The operations    confirmed the moisture content of the feed to be a critical controlling variable.    Maintaining this moisture at a well-defined range ensures an effective size    reduction, as well as steady operating conditions, low wear from an effective    autogenous coating of the KHD stud-lined rolls, and minimal difficulties in    material transport and hold-up in bins, feed chute, and on conveyor belts.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Feed segregation    was identified as another important issue to address. A well-designed feed circuit    provides for a well-tuned HPGR feed without significant segregation. In combination    with a well-controlled hydraulic pressure and roll positioning system, this    allows the units to operate with an optimized gap control and parallel roll    surface setting.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The quick exchange    facility of the 'SWING' frame of the HPGR allows for a fast roll exchange procedure,    reducing downtime to less than 24 hours and requiring a minimum of installed    auxiliary maintenance facilities.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Justification of    a truncated circuit depends on the effects of a truncated feed on the reduction    of mass flow to the HPGR (proportion of fines in the HPGR section feed), the    extra requirements in conveying and screening, the reduced specific throughput    and increase in specific energy, and the anticipated increase in roll surface    wear rate.</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>References</b></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">1. BARRERA, R.R.    Comparativo Comportamiento Desgaste. <i>Internal communication of CMP,</i> Power    Point Presentation, 3 January, 2005.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=248991&pid=S0038-223X201200070000800001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">2. DOWLING, E.C.,    <i>et al.</i> 2001. Applications of High Pressure Grinding Rolls in an Autogenous-Pebble    Milling Circuit. <i>Proceedingsfrom the SAG Conference,</i> 30 September-3 October,    2001. Vancouver, Canada.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=248992&pid=S0038-223X201200070000800002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">3. DUNNE, R., MAXTON,    D., MORRELL, S., and LANE, G. 2004. High pressure grinding rolls - the Australian    experience. <i>SME Annual Conference,</i> Denver, February 2004.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=248993&pid=S0038-223X201200070000800003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">4. FLATMAN, S.,    BATTERSBY, R.M., IMHOF, R. BATTERSBY M., and IBRAYEV, S. 2010 The Leachox refractory    gold process - the setting, design, installation and commissioning of a large    scale plant at the VASGOLD gold mine, Kazakhstan. <i>Precious Metals 2010,</i>    Falmouth, Cornwall, UK, 15-16 June 2010.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=248994&pid=S0038-223X201200070000800004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">5. GALLARDO, V.H.    2007. Uso de Prensa de Rodillos en Planta Beneficia Mina Los Colorados. <i>Internal    communication of CMP,</i> Power Point Presentation, 8 March 2007.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=248995&pid=S0038-223X201200070000800005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">6. GERRARD, M.,    COSTELLO, B., and MORLEY, C. 2004. Operating experiences and performance assessment    of HPGR technology at Argyle Diamond Mine. <i>Proceedings of the Rio Tinto Comminution    Workshop 2004,</i> Perth, Australia.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=248996&pid=S0038-223X201200070000800006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">7. MAXTON, D.,    MORLEY, C., and BEARMAN, R. 200. Recrush HPRC Project - The Benefits of High    Pressure Rolls Crushing. <i>Proceedingsfrom the Crushing and Grinding Conference,</i>    29 October-1 November 2002. Kalgoorlie, Australia.</font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">8. MAXTON, D. and    VAN DER MEER, F.P. 2005. KHD Humboldt Wedag high pressure grinding olls - developments    for minerals applications. <i>Proceedings of the Randol Gold Forum,</i> Perth,    Australia, August 2005..</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=248998&pid=S0038-223X201200070000800008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">9. MAXTON, D.,    MORLEY, C., and BEARMAN, R. 2003. A quantification of the benefits of high pressure    rolls crushing in an operating environment. <i>Minerals Engineering,</i> vol.    16, no. 9, pp 827-838.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=248999&pid=S0038-223X201200070000800009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">10. MAXTON, D.,    VAN DER MEER, F.P., and GRUENDKEN, A. 2006. KHD Humboldt Wedag. 150 years of    innovation. New developments for the KHD HPGR. <i>Proceedings SAG 2006,</i>    Vancouver, Canada, September 2006.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=249000&pid=S0038-223X201200070000800010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">11. ROSE, D.J.,    KORPI, P.A., and DOWLING, E.C. 2002. High Pressure Grinding Roll Utilization    at the Empire Mine. <i>Proceedingsfrom the Mineral Processing Plant Design Conference,</i>    20-24 October 2002, Vancouver, Canada.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=249001&pid=S0038-223X201200070000800011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">12. VAN DER MEER,    F.P. 1997. Roller Press Grinding of Pellet Feed. Experiences of KHD in the Iron    Ore Industry. <i>Proceedingsfrom the AusIMM Conference on Iron ore Resources    and reserves estimation,</i> 25-26 September, 1997, Perth, Australia.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=249002&pid=S0038-223X201200070000800012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">13. VAN DER MEER,    F.P. and DICKE, R. 2008. High pressure grinding; how high can you go? Procemin    2008, <i>Fifth International Minerals Processing Seminar,</i> Santiago, Chile,    22-24 october 2008.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=249003&pid=S0038-223X201200070000800013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">14. VAN DER MEER,    F.P. and GRUENDKEN, A. 2008. Flow sheet considerations for optimal use of high    pressure grinding rolls. <i>Comminution 2008,</i> Falmouth, Cornwall, UK, 17-20    June 2008.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=249004&pid=S0038-223X201200070000800014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">15. WESTERMEYER,    C.P. and CORDES, H. 2000. Operating Experience with a HPGR at the Los Colorados    Iron Ore Dressing Plant in Chile. <i>Aufbereitungs-Technik /Mineral Processing,</i>    vol. 11, 2000. pp. 497-505. </font><font  size="2">&#9830;</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=249005&pid=S0038-223X201200070000800015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Paper received    Aug. 2011    <br>   revised paper received Mar. 2012.</font></p>      ]]></body>
<REFERENCES></REFERENCES<back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BARRERA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Comparativo Comportamiento Desgaste.: Internal communication of CMP, Power Point Presentation]]></source>
<year>3 Ja</year>
<month>nu</month>
<day>ar</day>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DOWLING]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Applications of High Pressure Grinding Rolls in an Autogenous-Pebble Milling Circuit.]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ SAG Conference]]></conf-name>
<conf-date>30 September-3 October, 2001</conf-date>
<conf-loc>Vancouver </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DUNNE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MAXTON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MORRELL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LANE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[High pressure grinding rolls - the Australian experience.]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ SME Annual Conference]]></conf-name>
<conf-date>February 2004.</conf-date>
<conf-loc>Denver </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FLATMAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BATTERSBY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[IMHOF]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BATTERSBY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[IBRAYEV]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Leachox refractory gold process: the setting, design, installation and commissioning of a large scale plant at the VASGOLD gold mine]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ Precious Metals]]></conf-name>
<conf-date>15-16 June 2010</conf-date>
<conf-loc>Falmouth UK</conf-loc>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Kazakhstan. ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GALLARDO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Uso de Prensa de Rodillos en Planta Beneficia Mina Los Colorados.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Internal communication of CMP, Power Point Presentation]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<month>8 </month>
<day>Ma</day>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GERRARD]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[COSTELLO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MORLEY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Operating experiences and performance assessment of HPGR technology at Argyle Diamond Mine.]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ Rio Tinto Comminution Workshop]]></conf-name>
<conf-date>2004</conf-date>
<conf-loc>Perth </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MAXTON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MORLEY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BEARMAN,]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Recrush HPRC Project: The Benefits of High Pressure Rolls Crushing.]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ Crushing and Grinding Conference]]></conf-name>
<conf-date>29 October-1 November 2002.</conf-date>
<conf-loc>Kalgoorlie </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MAXTON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VAN DER MEER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[KHD Humboldt Wedag high pressure grinding olls - developments for minerals applications.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ Randol Gold Forum]]></conf-name>
<conf-date>August 2005</conf-date>
<conf-loc>Perth </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MAXTON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MORLEY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BEARMAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[A quantification of the benefits of high pressure rolls crushing in an operating environment.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Minerals Engineering]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>9</numero>
<issue>9</issue>
<page-range>827-838</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MAXTON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VAN DER MEER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GRUENDKEN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[KHD Humboldt Wedag.: 150 years of innovation.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ SAG]]></conf-name>
<conf-date>2006</conf-date><conf-date>September 2006.</conf-date>
<conf-loc>Vancouver </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ROSE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KORPI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DOWLING]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[High Pressure Grinding Roll Utilization at the Empire Mine.]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ Mineral Processing Plant Design Conference]]></conf-name>
<conf-date>20-24 October 2002</conf-date>
<conf-loc>Vancouver </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VAN DER MEER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Roller Press Grinding of Pellet Feed. Experiences of KHD in the Iron Ore Industry.]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ AusIMM Conference on Iron ore Resources and reserves estimation]]></conf-name>
<conf-date>25-26 September, 1997</conf-date>
<conf-loc>Perth </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VAN DER MEER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DICKE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[High pressure grinding;: how high can you go? Procemin 2008]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[Fifth International Minerals Processing Seminar]]></conf-name>
<conf-date>22-24 october 2008.</conf-date>
<conf-loc>Santiago </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VAN DER MEER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GRUENDKEN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Flow sheet considerations for optimal use of high pressure grinding rolls.]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ Comminution]]></conf-name>
<conf-date>2008</conf-date><conf-date>17-20 June 2008.</conf-date>
<conf-loc>Falmouth UK</conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WESTERMEYER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CORDES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Operating Experience with a HPGR at the Los Colorados Iron Ore Dressing Plant in Chile.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Aufbereitungs-Technik /Mineral Processing]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<month>20</month>
<day>00</day>
<volume>11</volume>
<page-range>497-505</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
