<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0038-223X</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0038-223X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0038-223X2012000600011</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Fluidization behaviour of various titania feedstocks]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moodley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kale]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bessinger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kucukkaragoz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A03"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eric]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.H]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A03"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Exxaro Resources  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Pretoria ]]></addr-line>
<country>South Africa</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Mintek  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Johannesburg ]]></addr-line>
<country>South Africa</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A03">
<institution><![CDATA[,University of the Witwatersrand  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Johannesburg ]]></addr-line>
<country>South Africa</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2012</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2012</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>112</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<fpage>467</fpage>
<lpage>471</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0038-223X2012000600011&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0038-223X2012000600011&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0038-223X2012000600011&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[In the chloride process for TiO2 pigment production, various titania feedstocks (i.e. rutile, synthetic rutile, slag, and upgraded titania slag (UGS)) are chlorinated in a fluidized bed reactor with petroleum coke at temperatures between 1000°C and 1100°C to yield gaseous metal chlorides. Although feedstock preference is largely based on TiO2 content, feedstock physical properties (i.e. density, sphericity, size distribution, and porosity) differ; these differences will affect fluidization behaviour and can inadvertently affect conversion efficiency. For example, a high carryover from the reactor reduces particle residence time and decreases conversion rates. Owing to dwindling rutile reserves in the world, most chloride producers are forced to feed blends of feedstocks to their chlorinators; and so it becomes important to understand whether blends have an effect on the hydrodynamic properties of the bed. This paper describes the physical characterization of different feeds and the determination of the elutriation constants for slag, rutile, synthetic rutile, and a blend (i.e. 50 wt% rutile, 50 wt% slag). A common feature of the tests was that particles finer than 75 &#956;m tended more than any other size to be elutriated. The tested rutile, classified as a Geldart Group B material, had the lowest carryover, whereas the slags had the highest. Interestingly, the elutriation constant (ki) of the blend is lower than those of either of its individual components.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[fluidization]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[elutriation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[titania feedstocks]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[blowover]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[chlorination]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[hydrodynamics.]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b>JOURNAL    PAPER</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="4"><b>Fluidization    behaviour of various titania feedstocks</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b>S. Moodley<sup>I</sup>;    A. Kale<sup>II</sup>; D. Bessinger<sup>I</sup>; C. Kucukkaragoz<sup>III</sup>;    R.H. Eric<sup>III</sup></b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><sup>I</sup>Exxaro    Resources, Pretoria, South Africa    <br>   <sup>II</sup>Mintek, Johannesburg, South Africa    <br>   <sup>III</sup>University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p> <hr size="1" noshade>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b>SYNOPSIS</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">In the chloride    process for TiO<sub>2</sub> pigment production, various titania feedstocks (i.e.    rutile, synthetic rutile, slag, and upgraded titania slag (UGS)) are chlorinated    in a fluidized bed reactor with petroleum coke at temperatures between 1000&deg;C    and 1100&deg;C to yield gaseous metal chlorides. Although feedstock preference    is largely based on TiO<sub>2</sub> content, feedstock physical properties (i.e.    density, sphericity, size distribution, and porosity) differ; these differences    will affect fluidization behaviour and can inadvertently affect conversion efficiency.    For example, a high carryover from the reactor reduces particle residence time    and decreases conversion rates. Owing to dwindling rutile reserves in the world,    most chloride producers are forced to feed blends of feedstocks to their chlorinators;    and so it becomes important to understand whether blends have an effect on the    hydrodynamic properties of the bed.    <br>   This paper describes the physical characterization of different feeds and the    determination of the elutriation constants for slag, rutile, synthetic rutile,    and a blend (i.e. 50 wt% rutile, 50 wt% slag). A common feature of the tests    was that particles finer than 75 </font><font size="2">&#956;</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">m    tended more than any other size to be elutriated. The tested rutile, classified    as a Geldart Group B material, had the lowest carryover, whereas the slags had    the highest. Interestingly, the elutriation constant (<i>ki</i>) of the blend    is lower than those of either of its individual components.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b>Keywords:</b>    fluidization, elutriation, titania feedstocks, blowover, chlorination, hydrodynamics.</font></p> <hr size="1" noshade>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>Background</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Titanium dioxide    is used mainly as pigment for paints, plastics, paper, cosmetics, toothpaste,    and inks. TiO<sub>2</sub> pigment is valued because it imparts whiteness, brightness,    and opacity to materials. Two processing routes exist for the production of    TiO<sub>2</sub> pigments. One is sulphate-based and the other chloride-based.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Fluidized bed technology    is employed for the chlorination process, therefore physical characteristics    such as density, size, and shape factor of the feedstock are important. The    feedstock has to consist of particles of sufficient size and density in order    for it to fluidize with minimal blowover from the chlorinator. Feed to chlorinators    includes a number of titania feedstocks - namely, synthetic rutile (SR), natural    rutile, upgraded titania slag (UGS), high-grade slag, and titania slag produced    from the smelting of ilmenite. Natural rutile is the preferred feedstock for    chlorination, but owing to dwindling reserves other titania products are substituted    as feed. The physical properties and phase chemistry of the feedstocks differ,    which has an impact on the way in which each feedstock reacts in the chlorinator,    even though the TiO<sub>2</sub> content might be similar.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Entrainment, carryover,    and elutriation are terms that will be used throughout the paper, and are defined    here. In vessels containing fluidized solids, the gas leaving carries some suspended    solids; the flux of solids is called entrainment or carryover<sup>1</sup>. Elutriation    refers to the selective removal of particles of individual sizes from the fluidized    bed.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">In bubbling fluidized-bed    reactors, solids are thrown into the freeboard in one of three ways: (1) from    the roof of a bursting bubble, (2) from the bubble wake, and (3) from the wake    of a trailing bubble just as it coalesces with its leading bubblei. A high elutriation    rate translates to a shorter residence for particles in the fluidized bed, which    in turn adversely affects conversion efficiencies.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Carryover of a    particular size fraction can be quantified by means of a measure called the    elutriation constant (<i>k<sub>i</sub></i>*). Kunii and Levenspieli describe    a procedure for determining elutriation constants by means of batch experiments.    Assuming that the flux rate of any particular size of solid <i>i</i> is proportional    to its weight fraction (<i>x<sub>i</sub></i>) in the bed, all other factors    being constant, the flux of particles out of the fluidized bed may be written    as</font></p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n6/11x01.jpg"></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">If the total mass    of the sample does not change much during a trial (i.e., &lt; 20%), then integration    of Equation &#91;1&#93; gives</font></p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n6/11x02.jpg"></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The elutriation    constant can be calculated by Equation &#91;2&#93;.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">This paper examines    the elutriation behavior of six samples-a rutile concentrate, SR, three different    slags, and a blend of slag and rutile.</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>Experimental    details</b></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>Samples</i></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The test samples    included three titania slags from different producers (two from South Africa    and a third from outside South Africa - Slag B), rutile, and SR.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b><i>Elutriation    testwork</i></b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The elutriation    tests were conducted in an externally heated quartz reactor. The quartz reactor    was connected to a crossover duct, with the solids in the off-gas discharged    through a cyclone and two collection flasks. The crossover duct provides a passage    for the gas and elutriated particles to leave the silica reactor. A porous distributor    plate divided the quartz reactor into two sections and allowed for the passage    of gases for fluidization of the sample. The diameter of the lower section of    the quartz reactor was 80 mm, and the height 300 mm. The diameter of the extended    freeboard section was 110 mm, and the height 500 mm.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Each sample (600    g) was fluidized with nitrogen. The gas flow was maintained constant throughout    the trial. Electrical power was used to raise the temperature of the fluidizing    material to 1000&deg;C; the heat-up period was 80 minutes. Each test ran with    the bed fluidized for 30 minutes at 1000&deg;C with a superficial gas velocity    of 0.19 m/s. In the extended freeboard section of the reactor, the superficial    gas velocity reduced to 0.10 m/s.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Gas exited at the    top of the reactor and carried with it a fraction of the finer and lighter material.    The elutriated solids were separated from the gas in the cyclone. The solids    settled out in the round-bottom flask, while the gas passed through the off-gas    duct and was vented from the system. After 30 minutes of fluidization at 1000&deg;C,    the power was switched off and the material cooled by the fluidizing gas. Upon    conclusion of a fluidization test, the bed sample and carryover were collected,    weighed, and the particle size distribution (PSD) measured.</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>Results and    discussion</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b><i>Sample characterization</i></b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Chemical composition    of the feedstock is reported in <a href="#t1">Table I</a>.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><a name="t1"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n6/11t01.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The blend consists    of a 1:1 ratio of Slag A and rutile. The particle size distribution and density    are given in <a href="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n6/11t02.jpg">Table II</a>. The    chemical analysis was determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission    spectrometry (ICP - OES) techniques, and particle size by screening.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">As a product of    milling, the slags are angular and have a wider particle size distribution than    natural rutile. Rutile particles are smoother and more spherical than the slag    particles. The differences in the shape and size are evident from the scanning    electron microscope (SEM) backscattered electron images shown in <a href="#f2">Figures    2</a> and <a href="#f3">3</a>.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b><i>Material    properties</i></b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Geldart<sup>2</sup>    proposed a classification of the fluidization behaviour of a bed of solid particles    fluidized by air under normal ambient conditions. Beds of particles fall into    one of four groups based on density and mean particle size, that is, Group A,    Aeratable; Group B, Sandlike bubbling; Group C, Cohesive; and Group D, Spoutable    (see <a href="#f4">Figure 4</a>).</font></p>     <p><a name="f1"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n6/11f01.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><a name="f2"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n6/11f02.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><a name="f3"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n6/11f03.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><a name="f4"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n6/11f04.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Under ambient conditions,    all feedstocks lie in Group B and are according to the Geldart classification,    easy to fluidize. The larger fractions of the slags (i.e. &gt;600 </font><font size="2">&#8734;</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">    m) belong to Group D.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">At operating temperatures    and pressures above ambient, the material may appear in a different group from    that which it occupies at ambient conditions, due to the change in gas properties.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b><i>Fluidization    properties</i></b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The velocity that    marks the onset of fluidization is termed the minimum fluidizing velocity. This    velocity can be estimated by Equation &#91;3&#93;<sup>1</sup>.</font></p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n6/11x03.jpg"></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The minimum fluidizing    velocities for the feedstocks were calculated using the mean particle sizes    (see <a href="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n6/11t03.jpg">Table III</a>). The sphericity    values for sharp sand and round sand from Kunii and Levenspiel<sup>1</sup> were    used for the minimum fluidizing velocity calculation. Luckos and den Hoed<sup>3</sup>    determined sphericity values for titania slag of between 0.439-0.555, which    are slightly lower than the Kunii and Levenspiel<sup>1</sup> values. The density    of air (at 1000&deg;C) used was 0.27 kg/m<sup>3</sup>, while the viscosity of    air (at 1000&deg;C) used was 4.91x10<sup>-5</sup> kg/m.s.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The mean particle    size of the slags is larger than the other feedstocks, and consequently the    minimum fluidizing velocities are higher.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Terminal velocity    (<i>u<sub>t</sub></i>) for the various size fractions was calculated with Equations    &#91;4&#93;, &#91;5&#93;, and &#91;6&#93;<sup>1</sup> (See <a href="#t4">Table    IV</a>). At gas velocities higher than the terminal velocity, particles will    be blown out of the bed. Bubble size and disengagement height also play a role    in determining which particles are entrained.</font></p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n6/11x04-06.jpg"></p>     <p><a name="t4"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n6/11t04.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Most industrial    chlorinators operate at a superficial velocity of 0.15 m/s, so particles with    a terminal velocity lower than 0.15 m/s can be elutriated from the bed. In the    trials, feedstocks were fluidized with a superficial velocity of 0.19 m/s. According    to the calculated terminal velocity values, particles finer than 75 </font><font size="2">&#956;</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">m    will be susceptible to elutriation since terminal velocity is lower than 0.19    m/s. Slag B has the highest fraction of particles less than 75 </font><font size="2">&#956;</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">m,    and it is expected that about 10 per cent of Slag B will be elutriated compared    to approximately 2 per cent of the other feedstocks.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b><i>Elutriation    constant</i></b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><a href="#f5">Figure    5</a> records the fraction blowover for each sample after the 30-minute fluidization    experiment, and calculated elutriation constants are presented in <a href="#t5">Table    V</a>. The percentage blowover is calculated by Equation &#91;7&#93;.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n6/11x07.jpg"></p>     <p><a name="f5"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n6/11f05.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><a name="t5"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n6/11t05.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Elutriation constants    are proportional to the amount of material removed from a chlorinator. Smaller    size fractions are more likely to be elutriated, and this is illustrated by    the results. Elutriation constants for particles finer than 75 </font><font size="2">&#956;</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">m    are more than three times greater than those for the adjacent, coarser size    fraction. Blowovers from the rutile and SR sample are significantly lower than    those of the slags. The finer material (i.e. -75 </font><font size="2">&#956;</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">m)    had the highest tendency to be elutriated. A small fraction of the particles    in 150-212 </font><font size="2">&#956;</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">m    size range were also elutriated. Particles larger than 212 </font><font size="2">&#956;</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">m    were not elutriated.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The slags have    the highest blowovers and thus highest <i>ki<sup>*</sup></i> values. Slag B    had the highest mass of fines (i.e. particles &lt; 75 </font><font size="2">&#956;</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">m)    and thus blowover was the highest.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Chloride pigment    producers do not usually feed the -106 </font><font size="2">&#956;</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">m    fraction to the chlorinator, but the results indicate that the fraction larger    than 75 </font><font size="2">&#956;</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">m    and finer than 106 </font><font size="2">&#956;</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">m    does not pose as significant an elutriation problem as the fraction finer than    75 </font><font size="2">&#956;</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">m.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The elutriation    constants of the blend are lower than the average constants of rutile and Slag    A. The values are closer to those of rutile, indicating that the blowover of    slag is significantly reduced in the blend. It appears that the blending of    two feedstocks changes the hydrodynamic behavior of the bed and results in lower    blowover. With the combination of feedstocks, the bulk physical properties of    the bed change. The most obvious is the change in particle size distribution    and the mean particle size (i.e. <i>d</i><sub>50</sub>). The <i>d</i><sub>50</sub>    of Slag A is 294 </font><font size="2">&#956;</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">m    and the <i>d</i><sub>50</sub> of rutile is 110 </font><font size="2">&#956;</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">m.    By combining the feedstocks, we effectively widen the distribution.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Previous work<sup>4,5</sup>    suggests that the gas bubble size is reduced when the bed is made up of particles    with a wide particle size distribution. Sun and Grace<sup>5</sup> suggest the    following as an explanation to why bubble size is reduced:</font></p>     <blockquote>        <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n6/set.jpg" align="absmiddle">      The wider particle size distributions result in a more expanded dense phase,      which in turn leads to more gas passing through the dense phase and to a reduced      effective viscosity</font></p>       <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><img src="/img/revistas/jsaimm/v112n6/set.jpg" align="absmiddle">      Associated with the lower effective dense-phase viscosity, voids or bubbles      tend to be smaller with a wider particle size distribution.</font></p> </blockquote>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Bubbles carry particles    as they move through the bed, and when the bubble reaches the surface, it bursts    and material is thrown into the freeboard area<sup>6-8</sup>. Smaller bubbles    carry less material, which leads to lower entrainment rates. George and Grace<sup>9</sup>    investigated the volume of ejected particles as a function of bubble size, and    found that the volume of elutriated particles increases with increasing bubble    size. Although it is unclear why the blowover from the blend is low compared    to that of its individual components, the elutriation result has significant    implications for slag and pigment producers. The results of this study show    that if slag is fed together with rutile, the blowover can be lowered.</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>Conclusion</b></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">A high elutriation    rate translates to a shorter residence time for particles in the fluidized bed,    which in turn lowers conversion efficiencies. Although the elutriation experiments    were conducted in an inert environment, these results provide a comparative    indication of the relative elutriation rates of feedstocks from a chlorinator.    The blowovers from the three slags were higher than those of the rutile, SR,    and the blend; this means that if the same amount of each feedstock is individually    fed to a chlorinator, there will be more rutile and SR available for chlorination    than slags. Particles finer than 212 </font><font size="2">&#956;</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">m    were elutriated, and particles finer than 75 </font><font size="2">&#956;</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">m    had the highest tendency to be elutriated.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The elutriation    constants of the blend were lower than the average of its individual feedstocks.    It is hypothesized that the wider particle size distribution of the blend leads    to improved fluidization behaviour; however, further work is required to support    this hypothesis. Nonetheless, the elutriation results of the blend have significant    implications for the slag and pigment producers. The results of this study show    that if slag is fed together with rutile, the blowover can be lowered. It is    recommended that chlorination tests are conducted on the individual feedstocks    and blends to determine if the same trend is observed, and the implication for    conversion rates.</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>Acknowledgements</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Exxaro is acknowledged    for permission to publish this paper. Appreciation is also expressed to the    reviewers for useful comments and insights on the paper.</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>Notation</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>d<sub>p</sub>&nbsp;</i>mean    particle diameter, m</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>d<sub>p</sub>&nbsp;</i>measure    of particle diameter, dimensionless</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>p<sub>s</sub>&nbsp;</i>density    of solids, kg/m<sup>3</sup></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>P<sub>g</sub>&nbsp;</i>density    of gas, kg/m<sup>3</sup></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">&#934;<i><sub>s</sub></i>    sphericity of particle, dimensionless</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">&#956; viscosity    of gas, kg/m.s</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">&#949;<i><sub>mf</sub></i>    voidage at minimum fluidization, dimensionless</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>u<sub>t</sub>&nbsp;</i>terminal    velocity, m/s</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>u*&nbsp;</i>measure    of particle velocity, dimensionless</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>u<sub>mf</sub>&nbsp;</i>minimum    fluidizing velocity, m/s</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>W<sub>io</sub>&nbsp;</i>initial    weight of mass fraction <i>i</i>, g</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>W<sub>i</sub>&nbsp;</i>final    weight of mass fraction <i>i</i>, g</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>W&nbsp;</i>total    weight of sample before fluidization, g</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>A&nbsp;</i>cross-sectional    area of reactor, m<sup>2</sup></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>t&nbsp;</i>time,    s</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>k<sub>i</sub>*&nbsp;</i>elutriation    constant, kg/m<sup>2</sup>.s</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>M<sub>E</sub>&nbsp;</i>mass    of material elutriated, g</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>M<sub>i</sub>&nbsp;</i>initial    sample mass, g</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>x<sub>i</sub>&nbsp;</i>weight    fraction of solids of size <i>i,</i> dimensionless</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>References</b></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b>1.</b>&nbsp;Kunii,    D. and Levenspiel O. Fluidization Engineering. 2nd edn. Boston, Butterworth    - Heineman, 1991.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=254744&pid=S0038-223X201200060001100001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b>2.</b>&nbsp;Geldart,    D. Types of gas fluidization. <i>Powder Technology,</i> vol. 7, 1973. pp. 285-292.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=254745&pid=S0038-223X201200060001100002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b>3.</b>&nbsp;LUCKOS,    A. and DEN HOED, P. Fluidization and flow regimes of titaniferous solids. <i>Industrial    and Engineering Chemistry Research,</i> vol. 43, 2004. pp. 5645-5652.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=254746&pid=S0038-223X201200060001100003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b>4.</b>&nbsp;Beetstra,    R., Nijenhuis, J., Ellis, N., and van Ommen, J.R. The influence of particle    size distribution on fluidized bed hydrodynamics using high through put experimentation.    <i>AIChE Journal,</i> vol, 55, no. 8, 2009. pp. 2013-2023.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=254747&pid=S0038-223X201200060001100004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b>5.</b>&nbsp;Grace,    J.R. and Sun, G. 1991. Influence of particle size distribution on the performance    of fluidized bed reactors. <i>Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering,</i>    vol. 69, 2009. pp. 1126-1134.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=254748&pid=S0038-223X201200060001100005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b>6.</b>&nbsp;Sun,    G. and Grace, J.R. The effect of particle size distribution on the performance    of a catalytic fluidized bed reactor. <i>Chemical Engineering Science,</i> vol.    45, no. 8, 1990. pp. 2187- 2194.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=254749&pid=S0038-223X201200060001100006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b>7.</b>&nbsp;Baeyens,    J., Geldart, D., and Wu, S.Y. Elutriation of fines from gas fluidized beds of    Geldart A type powders-effect of adding superfines. <i>Powder Technology,</i>    vol. 71, 1992. pp. 71-80.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=254750&pid=S0038-223X201200060001100007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b>8.</b>&nbsp;Wen,    C.Y. and Chen, L.H. Fluidized bed freeboard phenomena: entrainment and elutriation.    <i>AIChE Journal,</i> vol. 28, no. 1, 1982. pp. 117-128.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=254751&pid=S0038-223X201200060001100008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b>9.</b>&nbsp;George,    S.E. and Grace, J.R. Entrainment of particles from aggregative fluidized beds.    <i>American Institute for Chemical Engineers,</i> Symposium Series 74, 1978.    pp. 67-74.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=254752&pid=S0038-223X201200060001100009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">This paper was    first presented at the, Industrial Fluidization South Africa Conference, 16-17    November 2011, Cradle of Humankind, South Africa.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ ]]></body>
<REFERENCES></REFERENCES<back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kunii]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Levenspiel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Fluidization Engineering]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<edition>2nd</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Boston ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Butterworth - Heineman]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Geldart]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Types of gas fluidization]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Powder Technology]]></source>
<year>1973</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<page-range>285-292</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Luckos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Den Hoed]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Fluidization and flow regimes of titaniferous solids]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>43</volume>
<page-range>5645-5652</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beetstra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nijenhuis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ellis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[van Ommen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The influence of particle size distribution on fluidized bed hydrodynamics using high through put experimentation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[AIChE Journal]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>55</volume>
<numero>8</numero>
<issue>8</issue>
<page-range>2013-2023</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Grace]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sun]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Influence of particle size distribution on the performance of fluidized bed reactors]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<month>20</month>
<day>09</day>
<volume>69</volume>
<page-range>1126-1134</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sun]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Grace]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The effect of particle size distribution on the performance of a catalytic fluidized bed reactor]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Chemical Engineering Science]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>45</volume>
<numero>8</numero>
<issue>8</issue>
<page-range>2187- 2194</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baeyens]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Geldart]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.Y]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Elutriation of fines from gas fluidized beds of Geldart A type powders-effect of adding superfines]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Powder Technology]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<volume>71</volume>
<page-range>71-80</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Fluidized bed freeboard phenomena: entrainment and elutriation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[AIChE Journal]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>117-128</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[George]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Grace]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Entrainment of particles from aggregative fluidized beds]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Institute for Chemical Engineers, Symposium Series]]></source>
<year>1978</year>
<volume>74</volume>
<page-range>67-74</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
