SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.42 número3The effect of a repeated course of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy, implemented in the home environment, on the functional skills of a young child with cerebral palsyThe use of the Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests with South African children índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados



Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google


South African Journal of Occupational Therapy

versión On-line ISSN 2310-3833
versión impresa ISSN 0038-2337

S. Afr. j. occup. ther. vol.42 no.3 Pretoria  2012




The experiences of parents with tactile defensive children



Ruan SpiesI; Esmé van RensburgII

IMA (Clinical Psychology). Psychologist, Witrand Hospital Potchefstroom, SA
IIPhD (Child Psychology). Associate Professor, Dept of Psychology. North West University, PUK Campus, Potchefstroom





AIM: Tactile defensiveness is a phenomenon that infringes on the daily lives of many young children and their parents. This study explored the experiences of parents of children with tactile defensiveness. As primary caregivers, parents' experiences of the condition can give valuable insight into the possible considerations regarding intervention approaches used by professionals. Relatively little research has been done on the topic.
METHOD: A phenomenological framework was used, gathering the data via a thematic content analysis of interviews held with seven participants concerning their experiences of the condition.
RESULTS: It became evident that many different areas of the parents' daily living were affected. Parents reported feelings of emotional turmoil in relation to their children, including frustration, exhaustion, incompetency and not having their own needs met. They experienced that having a child with tactile defensiveness influenced the parent-child relationship. Tactile defensiveness also impacted on siblings and the relationship between the parents. However, parents also reported that they found their own unique ways of dealing with the condition which enhanced their coping abilities. The important role of psychologists and occupational therapists in providing parents with information regarding tactile defensiveness were highlighted. The findings of this study aim to guide parents and professionals alike in the process of dealing with a child diagnosed with tactile defensiveness.

Key words: Tactile defensiveness, tactile, sensory integration disorder, processing disorders



“Full text available only in PDF format”




1. Stagnitti K, Raison P, Ryan P Sensory defensiveness syndrome: a paediatric perspective and case study. Aust Occup Ther J, 1999; 46:175-187.         [ Links ]

2. Combrink FS. Die sosiale en emosionele funksionering van tasdefensiewe kinders [MA-dissertation]. South Africa, Potchefstroom: North-West University; 1996.         [ Links ]

3. Gilman AG, Hardman JG, Limbird LE, editors. The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001.         [ Links ]

4. Pfeiffer B, Kinnealey M. Treatment of sensory defensiveness in adults. Occup Ther Int, 2003;10(3):175-184.         [ Links ]

5. Royeen CB, Mu K. Stability of tactile defensiveness across cultures: European and American children's responses to the Touch Inventory for Elementary School Aged Children (TIE). Occup Ther Int, 2003; 10(3):165-174.         [ Links ]

6. Ayers AJ. Patterns of perceptual-motor dysfunction in children: A factor analytic study. Percept Mot Skills, 1965;20(2):335-368.         [ Links ]

7. Moore CF Gajewski LL, Laughlin NK, Luck ML, Larson JA, Schneider ML. Developmenta11ead Exposure Induces Tactile Defensiveness in Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca Mulatta). Environ Health Perspect, 2008;II6(I0):1322-1326.         [ Links ]

8. Watson CG. Tactile defensiveness and other sensory modulation Difficulties. La Leche League International [Internet].         [ Links ] 2001 Dec 2 [updated 2012 Mar 12]. Available from:

9. Bronfenbrenner U. Making Human Beings Human: Bio-ecological Perspectives on Human Development. Br J Dev Psychol, 2004;23(1):143-151.         [ Links ]

10. Tronick EZ. Dyadically expanded states of consciousness and the process of therapeutic change. Infant mental health, 1998:19(3):290-299.         [ Links ]

11. DeOliviera CA. Emotion Socialisation as a framework for understanding the development of disorganised attachment. Social Development, 2004:I3(3):437-467.         [ Links ]

12. Gupta VB. Comparison of parenting stress in different developmental Disabilities. J Dev Phys Disabil, 2007; 19:4 17-425.         [ Links ]

13. Burton RF Hinton JW. Defining stress. Med Educ, 2004;38:1013-1016.         [ Links ]

14. Royeen CB. TIP-Touch inventory for preschoolers: A pilot study. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr, 1987; 7:29-40.         [ Links ]

15. De Vaus D. Research Design. Vol. 3. London: Sage; 2006.         [ Links ]

16. Brandt R Dawes A, Africa A, Swartz L. A thematic content analysis psychologists' reports in child custody evaluations. S Afr J Psychol, 2004; 34(2): 259-282.         [ Links ]

18. Donalek JG. Phenomenology as a Qualitative Research Method. Urol Nurs, 2004;24(6):516-517.         [ Links ]

19. Lincoln YS, Guba, EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1985.         [ Links ]

20. Wilbarger P Wilbarger J. Sensory defensiveness in children aged 2-12. An intervention guide for parents and other caretakers. Denver: Avanti Educational Programs; 1991.         [ Links ]

21. Lopez-Wagner MC, Hoffman CD, Sweeney DP, Hodge D. Sleeping problems of parents of typically developing children and parents of children with autism. J Genet Psychol, 2008;I69(3):245-259.         [ Links ]

22. Maltby HJ, Kristjanson L, Coleman ME. The parenting competency framework: Learning to be a parent of a child with asthma. Int J Nurs Pract. 2003;9:368-373.         [ Links ]

23. Ghanizadeh A. Tactile sensory dysfunction in children with ADHD. Behav Neurol, 2008;20:107-112.         [ Links ]

24. Stephens D, Royeen CB. Investigation of tactile defensiveness and self-esteem among typically developing children. Occup Ther Int, 1998;5: 273-280.         [ Links ]

25. Margalit M, Ankonina DB. Positive and negative affect in parenting disabled children. Couns Psychol Q, 1991;4(4):289-300.         [ Links ]

26. Eisenberg N, Fabes RA, Shepard SA, Guthrie IK, Murphy BC, Reiser M. Parental reactions to children's negative emotions: Longitudinal relations to quality of children's social functioning. Child Dev, 1999;70(2):513-534.         [ Links ]

27. Baranek GT, Berkson G. Tactile Defensiveness in Children with Developmental Disabilities: Responsiveness and Habituation. J Autism Dev Disord, 1994;24(4):457-471.         [ Links ]

28. Prezant FP, Marshak L. Helpful actions seen through the eyes of parents of children with disabilities. Disabil Soc 2006; 21 (1):31-45.         [ Links ]

29. Smith AM, Roux S, Naidoo NT, Venter JL. Food choices of tactile defensive children. Nutrition. 2005;21 (1):14-19.         [ Links ]



Esmé van Rensburg

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons