SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.41 número1Employing people with disabilities in South AfricaVisual motor integration in children living in childcare institutions in Gauteng índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


South African Journal of Occupational Therapy

versión On-line ISSN 0038-2337

S. Afr. j. occup. ther. vol.41 no.1 Pretoria  2011

 

ARTICLES

 

Correlating the developmental test of visual perception-2 (DTVP-2) and the test of visual perceptual skills revised (TVPS-R) as assessment tools for learners with learning difficulties

 

 

Janet RichmondI; Kathy HollandII

IBOT (UP): MOT (UKZN). PhD Edith Cowen University. Lecturer Occupational Therapy, Edith Cowan University, Australia
IINat Dip OT: B(Hons) OT (UP): MEd (Tertiary Education) (UND). Lecturer: Occupational Therapy (Westville Campus). University of Kwa Zulu Natal

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

Learners are often referred to occupational therapists to assess their visual perceptual functioning. It is, therefore, imperative that the occupational therapists use the best assessment tools to obtain accurate and reliable results that lead to effective intervention which will be noticeable in the classroom functioning of these learners. A study was therefore conducted which correlated the results of the Developmental Test of Visual Perception (second edition) (DTVP-2) and the Test of Visual Perceptual Skills Revised (TVPS-R) in a cohort of 173 learners from Grade 1 to Grade 4 (children aged 6 years to 11 years). The learners attended a remedial school in Kwa-Zulu Natal (South Africa).
The DTVP-2 and TVPS-R appear to be of equal value when assessing a learner for visual perceptual difficulties. However, when specific sub-tests were used as a guide to focus therapy strategies, differences appear.

Key Words: Developmental Test of Visual Perception-2, Test of Visual Perceptual Skills-Revised, Assessment of Visual Perceptual functioning


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

References

1. Reid C. A comparative study of visual perceptual skills in normal children and children with diplegic cerebral palsy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1990;57(3):141-6.         [ Links ]

2. South-Africa. Education White Paper 6 on Special Needs Education - Building an inclusive education and training system. In: Education Do, editor: Pretoria: Triple CCC Advertising and Research; 2001.         [ Links ]

3. Fawcett A. Screening and intervention for dyslexia: from cradle to grave. In: Difficulties SAAoLwE, editor. The First International Conference in South Africa on Reading Difficulties and Dyslexia at the Turn of the Century - Biological and environmental influences; South Africa 2002.         [ Links ]

4. South-Africa. Policy handbook for educators. In: The Education Labour Relations Council. Brunton CA, editor. Pretoria: Universal Print Group; 2003.         [ Links ]

5. Pearse J, editor. Mismatched chronological age and reading levels in South African primary schools. The first International Conference in South Africa on Reading Difficulties and Dyslexia at the turn of the century - Biological and environmental influences; 2002; South Africa: South African Association of Learners with Educational Difficulties.         [ Links ]

6. Rosner J. Helping children overcome learning difficulties. United States of America: Walker Publishing Company Inc.; 1993.         [ Links ]

7. Silver LB. What are learning disabilities [on line].         [ Links ] United States of America: http://www.Idonline.org; 2001 [cited 2002 21 March].

8. Tseng MH, Chow SM. Perceptual motor function of school-aged children with slow handwriting speed. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2000;54(1):83-8.         [ Links ]

9. Edwards R. Accelerate: Visual perceptual processing. Book 5. Cape Town: Educational Workshop.; 1987.         [ Links ]

10. Kephart NC. The slow learner in the classroom. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill; 1960.         [ Links ]

11. Hanneford C. Smart moves: Why learning is not all in your head. Virginia: Great Ocean Publishers; 1995.         [ Links ]

12. Piaget J. The mechanisms of perception. London, UK: Rutledge & Kegan Paul.; 1969.         [ Links ]

13. Kirk SA, Gallagher JJ. Educating exceptional children. Third ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company; 1979.         [ Links ]

14. Frostig M, Horne D. The Frostig programme for the development of visual perception: Teacher's guide. Chicargo, IL: Follett Educational Corporation.; 1964.         [ Links ]

15. Kulp MT. Relationship between visual motor integration skill and academic performance in kindergerten through third grade. Optometry and Vision Science, 1999;76(3):159-63.         [ Links ]

16. Belka DE, Williams HG. Prediction of later cognitive behaviour from early school perceptual-motor, perceptual and cognitive performances. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1979;49:131-41.         [ Links ]

17. Gardner MF Test ofVisual Perceptual Skills (non-motor) Revised. Hydesville CA: Psychological and Educational Publications incorporated; 1996.         [ Links ]

18. Hammill DD, Pearson NA, Voress JK. Developmental Test of Visual Perception. Austin: Pro-ed; 1993.         [ Links ]

19. Fisher AG, Murray EA, Bundy AC. Sensory integration theory and practice. Philadelphia: F.A.Davis Company; 1991.         [ Links ]

20. Gregg N, Scott SS. Definition and documentation: Theory, measurement and the courts. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2000;33(1):5-12.         [ Links ]

21. Richardson PK. Use of standardised tests in paediatric practice. In: Case-Smith J, Allen AS, Pratt PN, editors. Occupational therapy for Children. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book Inc; 1996. p. 200-24.         [ Links ]

22. Moryosef-Ittah. Discriminant validity of the Developmental Test of Visual Perception-2 for children with learning disabilities. Occupational therapy international, 1996;3(3):204-11.         [ Links ]

23. Martin N. Test of Visual Perceptual Skills. 3rd ed. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications; 2006.         [ Links ]

24. McFall SA, Deitz JC, Crowe TX. Test-retest reliability of the Test of Visual Perceptual Skills with children with learning disabilities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1993;47:819-24.         [ Links ]

25. Bailey DM. Research for the health professional: A practical guide. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company; 1991.         [ Links ]

26. Mc Millan JH, Schumacher S. Research in education. A conceptual introduction. New York: Longman Incorporated; 2000.         [ Links ]

27. Rodger S, Brown T. An evaluation of the validity of the Test of Visual Perceptual Skills - Revised (TVPS-R) using the Rasch Measurement Model. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2009;72(2):65-78.         [ Links ]

28. Gardner MF. Test of Visual Motor Skills Revised. Hydesville, CA Psychological and Educational Publications, Inc; 1996.         [ Links ]

29. Catts HW, Kamhi AG. Language and reading disabilities. United States of America: A Viacom Company; 1999.         [ Links ]

30. Cherry C, Godwin D, Staples J. Is the left brain always right? : A guide to whole child development. Boston, MA: Fearon Teacher Aids; 1989.         [ Links ]

31. Frostig M, Lefever W, Whittlesey JRB. Developmental Test of Visual Perception: Administration and scoring manual. Calif: Consulting psychologists press; 1966.         [ Links ]

32. Green C, Chee K. Understanding ADHD. A parent's guide to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children. London: Vermilion.; 1997.         [ Links ]

33. Amundson SJ, Weil M. Prewriting and handwriting skills. In: Case-Smith J, Allen AS, Pratt PN, editors. Occupational Therapy for Children. 3rd ed. United States of America: Mosby-Year Book Inc; 1996. p. 524-41.         [ Links ]

34. Case-Smith J. Effectiveness of school-based occupational therapy intervention on handwriting. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2002;56(1):17-25.         [ Links ]

35. Tseng MH, Cremak SA. The influence of ergonomic factors and perceptual motor abilities on handwriting performance. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1993;47(10):919-26.         [ Links ]

36. Levine KJ. Fine motor dysfunction. Therapeutic strategies in the classroom. Arizona: Therapy Skill Builders (A Division of Psychological Corporation); 1991.         [ Links ]

37. Schneck CM. Visual perception. Case-Smith J, Allen AS, Pratt PN, editors. St Louis, MI: Mosby Year Book Inc.; 1996.         [ Links ]

38. Chinn S, editor. Dyslexia and mathematics. 28th Annual conference of South African Association of learners with educational difficulties; 2002 September 2002; University of the Western Cape, Bellville, Cape Town.         [ Links ]

39. Miles T, Chinn S, Peer L. Dyslexia and mathematics. A guide for parents and teachers. British Dyslexia Association; 2000.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
Janet Richmond
j.richmond@ecu.edu.au

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License