ARTICLES

 

Through the lens of a peer: Understanding leisure boredom and risk behaviour in adolescence

 

 

Lisa Wegner

BSc.OT (Wits), MSc.OT (UCT), PhD (UCT). Associate Professor and Chairperson, Department of Occupational Therapy, University of the Western Cape

Correspondence

 

 

---

ABSTRACT

There has been very little research investigating leisure boredom and risk behaviour among adolescents in South Africa. Using a qualitative approach, this study investigated adolescents' perceptions of leisure boredom and risk behaviour during free time. The sample of participants comprised three groups of adolescents: a community group, a school group and a group who had dropped out of school. Participants documented their free time experiences by taking photographs that were later discussed in focus groups. The findings showed that the participants were bored in their free time mainly because they had nothing to do. The low socio-economic environment where they lived contributed to occupational deprivation and imbalance in their free time, maintaining or 'trapping' the adolescents within the situation and contributing to feelings of boredom. The participants spent much of their free time 'hanging out' on street corners or in backyards, which allowed them to socialise, but inevitably led to boredom. Participants felt that boredom was part of life, although some perceived it to be 'dangerous' because it often led to risky behaviour. In conclusion, the study showed that for the participants, leisure is an occupational concern due to the occupational deprivation and imbalance occurring within their free time. Occupational therapists should consider how leisure boredom influences adolescent health, wellbeing and development, and plan interventions accordingly.

Key words: Adolescence, free time, leisure boredom, photographs, risk behaviour

---

 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

References

1. Wegner L, Flisher AJ, Muller M & Lombard C. Leisure boredom and substance use among high school students in South Africa. Journal of Leisure Research, 2006; 38: 249-266.         [ Links ]

2. Wegner L, Flisher AJ, Chikobvu P, Lombard C & King G. Leisure boredom and high school dropout in Cape Town, South Africa. Journal of Adolescence, 2008; 31: 421-431.         [ Links ]

3. Wegner L and Flisher AJ. Leisure boredom and adolescent risk behaviour: a systematic literature review. Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 2009; 21: 1-28.         [ Links ]

4. Barbalet JM. Boredom and social meaning. British Journal of Sociology, 1999; 50: 631-646.         [ Links ]

5. Conrad P It's boring: notes on the meanings of boredom in everyday life. Qualitative Sociology, 1997; 20: 465-475.         [ Links ]

6. Martin M, Sadlo G and Stew G. The phenomenon of boredom. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2006; 3: 193-211.         [ Links ]

7. Iso-Ahola SE and Weissinger E. Perceptions of boredom in leisure: conceptualisation, reliability and validity of the Leisure Boredom Scale. Journal of Leisure Research, 1990; 22: 1-17.         [ Links ]

8. Kaufman CE, Clark S, Manzini N and May J. How community structures of time and opportunity shape adolescent sexual behaviour in South Africa 2002. Policy Research Division, 159. The Population Council. Accessed on 15 April 2006 at http://www.popcouncil.org/publications/wp/prd/l59.html        [ Links ]

9. Wegner L. Leisure boredom and risk behaviour in adolescence. PhD thesis, University of Cape Town, South Africa 2008.         [ Links ]

10. Kleiber D, Larson R and Csikszentmihalyi M. The experience of leisure in adolescence. Journal of Leisure Research, 1986; 18: 169-176.         [ Links ]

11. Ellis GD and Witt PA. Perceived freedom in leisure and satisfaction: exploring the factor structure of the perceived freedom components of the Leisure Diagnostic Battery. Leisure Sciences, 1994; 16: 259-270.         [ Links ]

12. Wilcock AA. An Occupational Perspective of Health. United States of America: SLACK Incorporated 1998.         [ Links ]

13. Fourie M, Galvaan R and Beeton H. The impact of poverty: potential lost (Chapter 5, 69-84). In R. Watson & L. Swartz (Eds.), Transformation Through Occupation. London, England: Whurr Publishers 2004.         [ Links ]

14. Law M, Cooper B, Strong S, Stewart D, Rigby P and Letts L. The Person-Environment-Occupation Model: a transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1996; 63: 9-23.         [ Links ]

15. Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York, NY: Harper and Row 1990.         [ Links ]

16. Babbie E and Mouton J. The Practice of Social Research. Cape Town, South Africa: Oxford University Press Southern Africa 2001.         [ Links ]

17. Kanstrup AM. Picture the practice - using photography to explore use of technology within teachers' work practices. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2002; 3(2). Accessed on 11 June 2007 at http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-02/2-02kanstrup-e.htm        [ Links ]

18. Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. Task force on youth development and community programs. A matter of time: risk and opportunity in the nonschool hours. Washington, DC, USA: author published 1992.         [ Links ]

19. Larson RW and Richards MH. Boredom in the middle school years: blaming schools versus blaming students. American Journal of Education, 1991; 99: 418-443.         [ Links ]

20. Barbalet JM. Boredom and social meaning. British Journal of Sociology, 1999; 50: 631-646.         [ Links ]

21. Pavis S & Cunningham-Burley S. Male youth street culture: understanding the context of health-related behaviours. Health Education Research, 1999; 14, 583-596.         [ Links ]

22. Scitovsky T. Boredom - an overlooked disease? Challenge, Sept-Oct, 1999. Accessed on 8 May 2007 at http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_ml093/is_5_42/ai_56057292        [ Links ]

23. Martin M, Sadlo G and Stew G. The phenomenon of boredom. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2006; 3: 193-211.         [ Links ]

24. Department of Health, South Africa. National Guidelines for the Development of Health Promoting Schools / Sites in South Africa. Pretoria, South Africa: National Department of Health in collaboration with Department of Education and Department of Welfare 2000.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
Lisa Wegner
lwegner@uwc.ac.za