SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.39 issue3How teachers can manage attention span and activity level difficulties due to Foetal Alcohol Syndrome in the classroom: An occupational therapy approachApplying the Model of Creative Ability to patients with diabetic foot problems author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

South African Journal of Occupational Therapy

On-line version ISSN 2310-3833
Print version ISSN 0038-2337

S. Afr. j. occup. ther. vol.39 n.3 Pretoria Dec. 2009

 

 

 

Hedges in occupational therapy research texts

 

 

Ms Amanda Coetzer

(MA Linguistics; BA Hons Applied Linguistics; B Ed; HED, UNISA); Lecturer, English Language Department, University of Limpopo, Medunsa campus

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

The study examined an aspect of research writing, namely hedging. The aim was to establish the nature of the relation between the quality of the article and report writing in occupational therapy and the density of hedges in such writing. The texts comprised undergraduate reports, which were divided into two achievement groups, namely high and low achievers and journal articles by occupational therapists. Articles were included because it was assumed that they exemplified good writing, and accordingly, would be appropriately hedged, and would provide a reliable basis for comparing the student groups. Hyland's (1998) analytical framework was used. While statistical tests revealed no differences between the student groups, overall, the tests revealed significant differences in the use of hedges between the professional and student writers. In the light of these findings, it is suggested that hedging in research writing be studied and taught to students in order to assist them in their studies and careers.

Key words: research writing; scientific writing; academic writing; hedging; occupational therapy report writing


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

References

1. Angelil-Carter S Understanding plagiarism differently. In: Leibowitz B, Mohamed Y editors. Routes to writing in Southern Africa. Cape Town: Silk Road International Publishers, 2000.         [ Links ]

2. Olivier-Shaw AE Lecturer and student perceptions of an academic writing task. Rhodes University M Ed thesis, 1996.         [ Links ]

3. Thesen LK Voices in discourse. UCT M Ed thesis, 1994.         [ Links ]

4. Butler CS Qualifications in science: modal meanings in scientific texts. In: Nash W, editor. The writing scholar. Studies in academic discourse. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1990: 137-170.         [ Links ]

5. Darian S Hypotheses in introductory science texts. IRAL 1995; XXXIII/1: 83-108.         [ Links ]

6. Grabe W, Kaplan RB. On the writing of science and the science of writing: hedging in science text and elsewhere. In: Markkanen R, Schröder H, editors. Hedging and discourse. Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1997: 151-167.         [ Links ]

7. Myers G The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics 1989; 10(1): 1-35.         [ Links ]

8. Hyland K Talking to the academy. Forms of hedging in science research articles. Written Communication 1996; 13(2): 251-281.         [ Links ]

9. Adams Smith DE Medical discourse: aspects of author's comment. The ESP Journal 1984; 3: 25-36.         [ Links ]

10. Vartalla T Remarks on the communicative functions of hedging in popular scientific and specialist research articles on medicine. English for Specific Purposes 1999; 18(2): 177-200.         [ Links ]

11. Riley K Passive voice and rhetorical role in scientific writing. J. Technical Writing and Communication 1991; 21(3): 239-257.         [ Links ]

12. Webber P The functions of questions in different medical genres. English for Specific Purposes 1994; 13(3): 257-268.         [ Links ]

13. Luukka MR, Markkanen R Impersonalization as a form of hedging. In: Markkanen MR, Schröder H, editors. Hedging and discourse. Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1997: 168-187.         [ Links ]

14. Vassileva I Hedging in English and Bulgarian academic writing. In: Duszak A, editor. Culture and styles of academic discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1997: 203-221.         [ Links ]

15. Hyland K Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1998.         [ Links ]

16. Holmes J Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks. Applied Linguistics 1988; 9(1): 21-44.         [ Links ]

17. Hyland K Talking to the academy. Forms of hedging in science research articles. Written Communication 1994; 13(2): 251-281.         [ Links ]

18. Myers G Textbooks and the sociology of scientific knowledge. English for Specific Purposes 1992; 11: 3-17.         [ Links ]

19. Ellegard A Who was Junius? Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksfell, 1962.         [ Links ]

20. Coetzer A Hedging in occupational therapy report writing. UNISA MA dissertation. 2002.         [ Links ]

21. Coates J Epistemic modality and spoken discourse. Transactions of the Philological Society 1987; 85:100-131.         [ Links ]

22. Salager-Meyer F, Salas JC A genre-based and text-type analysis of hedging in written medical English written discourse. Interface. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1991; 6(1): 33-54.         [ Links ]

23. Leibowitz B, Mohamed Y Routes to writing in Southern Africa Cape Town: Silk Road International Publishers, 2000.         [ Links ]

24. Salager-Meyer F Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes 1994; 13(2): 149-170.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
Ms Amanda Coetzer
English Language Department, University of Limpopo
Medunsa campus
PO Box 144
MEDUNSA
0204
Email: acoetzer@medunsa.ac.za