SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.38 número3The right to respect for autonomy - Part IIBook Reviews índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


South African Journal of Occupational Therapy

versión On-line ISSN 2310-3833
versión impresa ISSN 0038-2337

S. Afr. j. occup. ther. vol.38 no.3 Pretoria  2008

 

 

 

Towards a uniform taxonomy of motor terminology: Stage 2

 

 

Paula Barnard-AshtonI; Denise FranzsenII

I(BSc OT (Witwatersrand)); Lecturer, University of the Witwatersrand
II(MSc OT (Witwatersrand)); Lecturer, University of the Witwatersrand

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

A uniform taxonomy within occupational therapy has become a recent focus of discussion in the literature. The study reported on in this paper investigated how South African occupational therapists use and understand terms related to motor performance in children with learning difficulties and developmental delay. This article reports on the second stage of a Delphi Technique, in which the information from an initial study was reformulated. Sixteen expert occupational therapists were then surveyed and asked to rate the level of association (weak to strong) of each characteristic of movement to six motor component terms and to define each term in their own words. The results yielded both quantitative and qualitative data, which revealed that while there was strong consensus among the occupational therapists on some aspects of motor terminology, there was still ambiguity and overlap of understanding, which was reflected in a worrying inconsistency of the descriptions of these terms in the literature and how occupational therapists use the terms in clinical practice.

Key words: motor terminology, learning disabilities, motor performance, assessment, paediatric, developmental delay


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

Reference:

1. Barnard P, Franzsen D. Motor terminology clarification survey. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2004;34(2):13-7.         [ Links ]

2. Coetzee E-l, Direct Correspondence with the Occupational Therapy Association of South Africa (OTASA). Email, 21 June 2007.         [ Links ]

3. Sugden DA, Chambers ME, Sinani C. The Nature of Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder. In: Sugden DA, Chambers ME (eds). Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder. London: Whurr Publishers, 2005:1-18.         [ Links ]

4. Bundy AC, Lane SJ, Murray EA. Sensory Integration: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: FF A. Davis Company; 2002.         [ Links ]

5. Fisher AG, Murray EA, Bundy AC. Sensory Integration: Theory and Practice. 1st ed. Philadelphia: FF A. Davis Compamy; 1991.         [ Links ]

6. American Psychiatric Association. Category 315:40 Developmental Coordination Disorder. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Discorders. 4th ed. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association, 1994:53-5.         [ Links ]

7. Polatajko HJ, Cantin N. Developmental Coordination Disorder (Dyspraxia): An Overview of the State of the Art. Learning Disabilities, ADHD and Related Disorders. 2005 12;12(4):250-8.         [ Links ]

8. Geuze RH. Motor Impairment in DCD and Activities of Daily Living. In: Sugden DA, Chambers ME (eds). Children with Developmental Coordiation Disorder. London: Whurr Publishers, 2005:19-46.         [ Links ]

9. Bruininks RH. Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (manual). Minnesota: American Guidance Service; 1978.         [ Links ]

10. Henderson SE, Sugden DA. Movement Assessment Battery for Children (manual). London: The Psychological Corporation; 1992.         [ Links ]

11. Ayres AJ. Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests (manual - updated edition). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 2004.         [ Links ]

12. Borst MJ, Nelson DL. Use of uniform terminology by occupational therapists. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1993 07;47(7):611-8.         [ Links ]

13. Nelson DL. Critiquing the logic of the domain section of the Occupational therapy practice framework: domain and process. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2006 09;60(5):511-23.         [ Links ]

14. Uniform Terminology for Reporting Occupational Therapy Services. Occupational Therapy News. 1979;35(11):1-8.         [ Links ]

15. Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: domain and process. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy: Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association. 2002 11;56(6):609-39.         [ Links ]

16. Uniform terminology for occupational therapy - third edition. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1994 11;48(11):1047-54.         [ Links ]

17. Creek J. Finding the right words: the significance of professional terminology. International Journal of Therapy & Rehabilitation. 2006; 13(1):6-.         [ Links ]

18. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington DC,: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.         [ Links ]

19. World Health Organisation. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2001.         [ Links ]

20. World Health Organisation. International Classification of Diseases and related Health Problems. Diagnostic criteria for research . 10th ed. New Yourk: Churchill-Livingston; 1993.         [ Links ]

21. Haglund L, Henriksson C. Concepts in Occupational Therapy in relation to the ICF Occupational Therapy International. 2003; 10(4):253-68.         [ Links ]

22. Fisher AG, Kielhofner G. Skill in Occupational Performance. In: Kielhofner G (ed). Model of Human Occupation. 2nd ed. Maryland: Williams and Wilkins, 1995.         [ Links ]

23. Exner CE. Development of Hand Skills. In: Case-Smith J (ed). Occupational Therapy for Children. St Louis: Mosby Inc., 2001:289-328.         [ Links ]

24. Gupta U, Clarke R. Theory and applications of the Delphi technique: A bibliography (1975 to 1994). Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 1996 10;53(2): 185-211.         [ Links ]

25. Hicks CM. Research Methods for Clinical Therapists. 3rd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1999.         [ Links ]

26. Kielhofner G. Research in Occupational Therapy: Methods of Inquiry for Enhancing Practice. I ed. Philidephia: FA. Davis Company; 2006. 706 p.         [ Links ]

27. Krause M, Viljoen M, Nel M, Joubert G. Development of a framework with specific reference to exit-level outcomes for the education and training of South African undergraduate physiotherapy students. Health Policy. 2006 6;77(1):37-42.         [ Links ]

28. Magill RA. Motor Learning: Concepts and Applications. 4th ed. Madison: Brown and Benchmark Publishers; 1993.         [ Links ]

29. Wilson EB. Occupational Therapy for Children with Special Needs. 1st ed. London: Whurr Publishers Limited; 1998.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
Paula Barnard-Ashton
Paula.Barnard@wits.ac.za

Denise Franzsen
Denise.Franzsen@wits.ac.za