SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.38 issue3Evaluation of Vestibular proprioceptive (VPP) functioning in children: Identification of relevant test itemsTowards a uniform taxonomy of motor terminology: Stage 2 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

South African Journal of Occupational Therapy

On-line version ISSN 2310-3833
Print version ISSN 0038-2337

S. Afr. j. occup. ther. vol.38 n.3 Pretoria  2008

 

 

 

The right to respect for autonomy - Part II

 

 

Dain van der Reyden

Nat Dip OT, BA, LLM (Med Law); Senior Lecturer - Department of Occupational Therapy, University of KwaZulu-Natal

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

This paper, the second in a series, approaches patient autonomy from an occupational therapy practitioner perspective. The Occupational Therapy Codes of Ethics as well as the Health Professions Council Guidelines for good practice are briefly reviewed, rights identified, limitations to autonomy discussed and practical implications and explicit guidelines for practice, as relevant to different areas of practice, proposed.

Key words: Patient autonomy, ethics, legislation, patient's rights, occupational therapy


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

References

1. van der Reyden D. The Right to Respect for Autonomy - Part 1: What is Autonomy all about? South African Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2008; 38(1):27-31.         [ Links ]

2. World Federation of Occupational Therapists Code of Ethics. <http://www.wfot.org/document.asp> (31/1/08).         [ Links ]

3. Occupational Therapy Code of Ethics. American Occupational Therapy Association Inc. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2000; 54: 614-616.         [ Links ]

4. British Association of Occupational Therapists Code of Ethics, College of Occupational Therapy, British Journal of Occupational Therapy 2001; 64 (12) 613-614.         [ Links ]

5. Australian Association of Occupational Therapists Code of Ethics. OT Australia 2001. http://www.otnsw.com.au/download/National-CodeEthics090801.pdf [28/8/08].         [ Links ]

6. Occupational Therapy Association of South Africa Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct (revised July 2005). South African Journal of Occupational Therapy 2007; 37:2 16-17.         [ Links ]

7. WFOT Survey results - Occupational Therapy Human Resources project. Draft. 2008. admin@wfot.org.au [14/7/08].         [ Links ]

8. Health Professions Council of South Africa. Booklets 1-17. Guidelines for Good Practice in the Health Care Professions. 2002, largely revised May 2007. Published by HPCSA Pretoria. http://www.hpcsa.co.za/hpcsa/default.aspx.id+152 [14/7/08]. Booklet 1 - General Ethical guidelines for Health Care Professions. Pretoria, 2002. Booklet 3 - National Patient's rights Charter. Pretoria, 2002. Booklet 10 - Seeking Patients Informed Consent: The Ethical Considerations (2ed) Pretoria, 2007. Booklet 11 - Confidentiality: Protecting and Providing Information (2ed) Pretoria, 2007. Items: 9.2.2.2, 9.2.2.3, 9.2.2.4, 9.1.1.3,11.

9. Patients Rights Charter as published by the South African Department of Health, launched in 1999.Available at http://www.doh.gov.za/docs/legislation/patients rightscharter.htlm. Also published as booklet 3 of HPCSA guidelines.         [ Links ]

10. Constitution of Republic of South Africa. Act 108 A 1996. Sections 10, 12 (2) Butterworths Statutes of South Africa as at 12 Feb 2007.         [ Links ]

11. Council of Occupational Therapists for the European Countries. Standards of Practice. 1996. http:/www.cotec-europe.org/eng (31/1/08).         [ Links ]

12. Marincowitz GJO. Mutual Participation in the Health Worker-patient Relationship. SA Fam Pract 2004:46[4] 30-32.         [ Links ]

13. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the Physician - Patient Relationships. In: Boetzres E, Waluchan WJ, eds, Readings in Health Care Ethics. Broadview Press, 2000 :39 - 41.         [ Links ]

14. Childress JF Siegler M. Metaphors and Models of the Doctor - Patient Relationship : Implications for Autonomy. In: Mappes TA, DeGrazia D, ed. Biomedical Ethics. McGraw Hill, Inc. New York, 2001: 78.         [ Links ]

15. Ackerman TF. 'Why Doctors Should Intervene' In: Mappes TA and DeGrazia D. Eds, Biomedical Ethics 4th Ed. McGraw Hill, Inc. New York, 1996:73-76.         [ Links ]

16. Mappes TA, DeGrazia D. General Introduction: In Mappes TA, DeGrazia D, eds. Biomedical Ethics. 4th ed. McGraw Hill, Inc. New York, 1996:24-44.         [ Links ]

17. Mill JS. Utilitariasm Liberty Essay on Bentham. Warric M. ed. On liberty cited in Mappes TA and DeGrazia D. Eds. Biomedical Ethics 4th Ed. McGraw Hill, Inc. New York 1996 :32.         [ Links ]

18. Mental Health Care Act 17 of 2002. Butterworths Statutes of South Africa as at 12 February 2007.         [ Links ]

19. Integrated National Disability Strategy. Department of Health, Republic of South Africa. White paper. Office of the President; November 1997.         [ Links ]

20. Cassidy JC. 'Access to Health Care : A Clinician's Opinion about an Ethical Issue. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1988; 42(5): 295-297.         [ Links ]

21. Neuhaus BE. Ethical Considerations in Clinical Reasoning: The impact of Technology and Cost Containment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1988; 42(5).         [ Links ]

22. McQuoid-Mason DJ. Legal aspects of medical practice. In: Dada MA, McQuoid-Mason DJ. Eds. Introduction to Medico-Legal Practice. Butterworths, Durban. 2001; 22-25.         [ Links ]

23. Tangwa GB. The Traditional African Perception of a Person: Some Implications for Bioethics. 2000. Hastings Report 30 No 5: 39, 40-43.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
Dain Van Der Reyden
reydend@ukzn.ac.za

 

 

This paper was initially prepared as requirement for the LLM[Med Law]. The guidance of Prof J Singh [ UKZN ] is gratefully acknowledged.

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License