SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.45 número2-3The Gospel of John's perception of ethical behaviourA blueprint for the future, Ephesians 1:9-10 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


In die Skriflig

versión On-line ISSN 1018-6441

In Skriflig (Online) vol.45 no.2-3 Cape Town jun. 2011

 

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

 

'n Teksgesentreerde retoriese analise van 1 Korintiërs 4

 

A text-centred rhetorical analysis of 1 Corinthians 4

 

 

A.H. Snyman

Departement Nuwe Testament. Universiteit van die Vrystaat. Bloemfontein. E-pos: asnyman44@gmail.com

 

 


OPSOMMING

Die tradisionele benadering tot die retoriese analise van Paulus se briewe is die gebruikmaking van kategorieë, ontleen aan die Grieks-Romeinse retoriese sisteem, om sin van sy oorreding-strategie te maak. Die probleem met die benadering is dat hierdie kategorieë vir die maak van toesprake bedoel was en nie vir die analise van briewe nie. Ten einde die probleem te hanteer, het geleerdes alternatiewe benaderings tot die analise van Paulus se briewe ontwikkel, waaronder die sogenaamde teksgesentreerde benadering.
Met die analisering van 1 Korintiërs 4 deur 'n teksgesentreerde benadering, beoog ek om addisionele bewyse te bied dat dit onnodig is om antieke retoriese kategorieë van buite op die hoofstuk af te dwing ten einde sin te maak van Paulus se retoriese strategie. Dit kan betreklik akkuraat uit die teks self gerekonstrueer word, mits die hoofstuk sistematies en deeglik bestudeer word.


ABSTRACT

The traditional approach in rhetorical analyses of Paul's letters is to apply categories derived from the Greek-Roman rhetorical system to make sense of his persuasive strategy. The problem with this approach is that the categories were intended for the production of speeches and not for the analysis of letters. In order to address the problem, scholars have developed alternative approaches to the analysis of his letters - one of them is the so-called text-centred approach.
By analysing 1 Corinthians 4 through a text-centred approach, I intend to provide additional evidence that it is unnecessary to force ancient rhetorical categories (from outside) on the chapter to make sense of Paul's persuasive strategy. It can be reconstructed fairly accurately from the text itself, provided that the chapter is studied carefully and systematically.


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

Geraadpleegde bronne

ANDERSON, R.D. 1999. Ancient rhetorical theory and Paul. Leuven: Peeters. (CBET 18.         [ Links ])

BARRETT, C.K. 1992. A commentary on the first epistle to the Corinthians. London: Black.         [ Links ]

CONZELMANN, H. 1975. 1 Corinthians: a commentary on the first epistle to the Corinthians. Hermeneia: Fortress.         [ Links ]

CORNELIUS, E.M. 1998. The effectiveness of 1 Thessalonians: a rhetorical-critical study. Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch. (Ph.D. dissertation.         [ Links ])

CRONJÉ, J.V. 1993. Demetrius on forcible style. Acta patristica et byzantina, 4:33-42.         [ Links ]

FEE, G.D. 1988. The first epistle to the Corinthians. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.         [ Links ]

FITZGERALD, J.T. 1988. Cracks in an earthern vessel: an examination of catalogues of hardships in the Corinthian correspondence. Atlanta: Scholars Press. (SBLDS 99.         [ Links ])

GROENEWALD, E.P. 1967. Die eerste brief aan die Korinthiërs. Pretoria: NG-Kerk Uitgewers.         [ Links ]

GROSHEIDE, F.W. 1954. Commentary on the first epistle to the Corinthians. London: Marshall, Morgan & Scott.         [ Links ]

LENSKI, R.C.H. 1963. The interpretation of St. Paul's first and second epistles to the Corinthians. Minneapolis: Augsburg.         [ Links ]

LOUW, J.P. & NIDA, E. A. 1988. Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament based on semantic domains. New York: UBS.         [ Links ]

MALAN, F.S. 1993. Rhetorical analysis of 1 Cor 4. Theologia viatorum, 20:100-114.         [ Links ]

MITCHELL, M. 1991. Paul and the rhetoric of reconciliation: an exegetical investigation of the language and composition of 1 Corinthians. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck.         [ Links ]

NIDA, E.A., LOUW, J.P., SNYMAN, A.H. & CRONJÉ, J.v.W. 1983. Style and discourse. Goodwood: N.B.P.         [ Links ]

POGOLOFF, S.M. 1992. Logos and Sophia: the rhetorical situation of 1 Corinthians. Atlanta: Scholars.         [ Links ]

PORTER, S.E. 1997. Paul of Tarsus and his letters. (In Porter, S.E., ed. Handbook of classical rhetoric in the Hellenistic period 330 BC-AD 400. Leiden: Brill. p. 533-585.         [ Links ])

SCHÜSSLER FIORENZA, E. 1987. Rhetorical situation and historical reconstruction in 1 Corinthians. New Testament studies, 33:386-403.         [ Links ]

THISELTON, A.C. 2000. The first epistle to the Corinthians: a commentary on the Greek text. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans. (NIGTC.         [ Links ])

TOLMIE, D.F. 2005. Persuading the Galatians: a text-centred rhetorical analysis of a Pauline letter. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck. (WUNT 2/90.         [ Links ])

WITHERINGTON, B. 1995. Conflict and community in Corinth: a socio-rhetorical commentary on 1 and 2 Corinthians. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.         [ Links ]

WOLFF, C. 2000. Der erste Brief des Paulus an die Korinther. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt. (Theologischer Handkommentar zum Neuen Testament 7.         [ Links ])

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License