SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.42 número3"Faithfulness to Scripture" in the worship service? Comments on a core confessionStem cell research and therapy: An overview of its feasibility with accompanying ethical implications índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


In die Skriflig

versão On-line ISSN 1018-6441

In Skriflig (Online) vol.42 no.3 Cape Town Jan. 2008

 

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

 

The second coming of Christ as the golden key to unlock the Book of Daniel: An analysis of a pentecostal interpretation of the dream in Daniel 2

 

Die tweede koms van Christus as die goue sleutel om die Boek van Daniël te ontsluit: 'n Analise van 'n pinkster-interpretasie van die droom in Daniël 2

 

 

M. Nel

School for Biblical Science and Biblical Languages, Potchefstroom Campus. North-West University. Potchefstroom. E-mail: MariusN@als.org.za

 

 


ABSTRACT

Pentecostals regard the doctrine of the second coming of Christ as very important. All passages in the Bible deemed to be "prophetical" are interpreted in premillennialist terms. Bennie Kleynhans' interpretation of the dream in Daniel 2 is used to demonstrate how an endeavourto find relevance through a contemporary interpretation of a Biblical passage, easily becomes outdated. He was of the opinion that communism, the Council on Foreign Relations and the European Economic Community with its ten members would introduce the Antichrist as the leader of a one-world government, eventually leading to the second coming of Christ. Daniel 2 is read as "prophecy", describing the global situation at the latter half of the twentieth century. This demonstrates that the differences in interpreting the dream in Daniel 2 reflect different ways of viewing and treating the Bible. A fundamentalist perspective sees the Bible as a blueprint of what God is going to do in future and how he is going to do this. The "future" - the "last days" just before the second coming of Christ - is inevitably linked to the present day.


OPSOMMING

Pinkstergelowiges heg groot waarde aan die wederkoms van Christus en interpreteer alle Skrifgedeeltes wat "profeties" mag klink in premillennialistiese terme. In hierdie artikel word Bennie Kleynhans se interpretasie van die droom in Daniël 2 gebruik om te demonstreer hoe 'n kontemporêre interpretasie van 'n Skrifgedeelte gedateer kan raak. Kleynhans het geglo dat kom-munisme, die Raad vir Buitelandse Verhoudings en die Europese Ekonomiese Gemeenskap met sy tien lede die Antichris sal voorstel as die leier van 'n eenwêreldregering en dat dit die wederkoms direk sal voorafgaan. Hy lees Daniël 2 as "profesie" wat die globale situasie in die tweede helfte van die twintigste eeu beskryf. So demonstreer Kleynhans hoe sy siening van die Bybel hom lei om Daniël 2 te interpreteer as 'n fundamentalistiese perspektief van die Bybel, as 'n bloudruk van wat God in ons tyd gaan doen. Die "laaste dae" net voor die tweede koms van Christus word direk aan die hede verbind.


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

List of references

ALOBAIDI, J. 2006. The Book of Daniel: the commentary of R. Saadia Gaon. Bern: Lang. (Bible in history.         [ Links ])

ANDERSON, R.A. 1984. Signs and wonders: a commentary on the Book of Daniel. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans. (International theological commentary.         [ Links ])

ANON. 2007. Europe. http://europa.eu Date of access: 3 Sept. 2007.         [ Links ]

BALDWIN, J.G. 1978. Daniel. Leicester: InterVarsity. (Tyndale Old Testament commentaries.         [ Links ])

BRAVERMAN, J. 1978. Jerome's commentary on Daniel: a study of comparative Jewish and Christian interpretations of the Hebrew Bible. Washington: Catholic Biblical Association of America. (The Catholic Biblical Quarterly. Monograph series, 7.         [ Links ])

BULTEMA, H. 1988. Commentary on Daniel. Grand Rapids: Kregel.         [ Links ]

CARAGOUNIS, C.C. 1993. History and supra-history: Daniel and the four empires. (In Van der Woude, A.S., ed. The Book of Daniel in the light of new findings. Leuven: Leuven University Press. p. 387-398.         [ Links ])

CASEY, P.M. 1976. Porphyry and the origin of the Book of Daniel. Journal of theological studies, 27(1):15-33.         [ Links ]

CRISWELL, W.A. 1968. Expository sermons on the Book of Daniel. Vol. 1. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.         [ Links ]

DAVIES, P.R. 1985. Daniel: Old Testament guides. Sheffield: JSOT.         [ Links ]

DAYTON, D.W. 1987. Theological roots of Pentecostalism. Peabody: Hendrickson.         [ Links ]

EHRMAN, B.D. 2005. Misquoting Jesus: the story behind who changed the Bible and why. New York: HarperCollins.         [ Links ]

EISSFELDT, O. 1974. The Old Testament: an introduction: the history of the formation of the Old Testament. Trans. by P.R. Ackroyd. Oxford: Blackwell.         [ Links ]

FEWELL, D.N. 1991. Circle of sovereignty: plotting politics in the Book of Daniel. Nashville: Abingdon.         [ Links ]

FRÖHLICH, I. 1993. Daniel 2 and Deutero-Isaiah. (In Van der Woude, A.S., ed. The Book of Daniel in the light of new findings. Leuven: Leuven University Press. p. 266-270.         [ Links ])

GINSBERG, H.L. 1948. Studies in Daniel. New York: Jewish Theological Seminary of America.         [ Links ]

HARTMAN, L.F. & DiLella, A.A. 1978. The Book of Daniel. Manchester: Anchor.         [ Links ]

JENNI, E. 1997. hr. (In Jenni, E. & Westermann, C., eds. Theological lexicon of the Old Testament. Vol. 1: ab - gnp. Translated by M.E. Biddle. Peabody: Massachusetts. p. 83-88.         [ Links ])

KLEYNHANS, B. s.a.a. Daniël en die eindtyd. Brakpan: Verenigde Gereformeerde Uitgewers.         [ Links ]

KLEYNHANS, B. s.a.b. Die Koning kom: 'n studie van die eindtyd. Silverton: Promedia.         [ Links ]

KOCH, K. 1980. Das Buch Daniel: Erträge der Forschung. Bd. 144. Under mitarbeit von Till Niewisch und Jürgen Tubach. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.         [ Links ]

LACOCQUE, A. 1979. The Book of Daniel. Trans. by D. Pellauer. London: SPCK.         [ Links ]

LINDSEY, H. 1972. Die groot planeet aarde - wat is sy toekoms? Roodepoort: Christelike Uitgewersmaatskappy.         [ Links ]

LUCAS, E.C. 2002. Daniel. Leicester: Apollos. (Apollos Old Testament commentary.         [ Links ])

POLAK, F.H. 1993. The Daniel tales in their Aramaic literary milieu. (In Van der Woude, A.S., ed. The Book of Daniel in the light of new findings. Leuven: Leuven University Press. p. 249-265.         [ Links ])

PORTEOUS, N. 1979. Daniel. 2nd rev. ed. London: SCM. (Old Testament library.         [ Links ])

SCHMIDT, W.H. 1997. elohim. (In Jenni, E. & Westermann, C., eds. Theological Lexicon of the Old Testament. Vol. 1: ab - gnp. Trans. by M.E. Biddle. Peabody: Massachusetts. p. 115-126.         [ Links ])

VERHOEF, P.A. 1994. Die aanduiding van tyd in die Boek Daniel. In die Skriflig, 28(2):223-233.         [ Links ]

WALVOORD, J.F. 1971. Daniel: the key to prophetic revelation: a commentary. Chicago: Moody.         [ Links ]

ZENGER, E. 1998. Das Buch Daniel. (In Zenger, E., et al. Einleitung in das Alte Testament. Herausgegeben. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. S. 458-467.         [ Links ])

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License