SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.74 issue3 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Koers

On-line version ISSN 2304-8557
Print version ISSN 0023-270X

Koers (Online) vol.74 n.3 Pretoria  2009

 

Reflections on the value concept in accounting

 

Beskouings oor die waardekonsep in rekeningkunde

 

 

P. Buys

School of Accounting Sciences, Potchefstroom Campus, North-West University, Potchefstroom. E-mail: Pieter.Buys@nwu.ac.za

 

 


ABSTRACT

The recent meltdown in global finances and the reasons for it may make people doubtful about the stewardship function of accounting. In the global financial markets, there is a great fascination with the reality that accounting values intend to reflect. However, what many people considered valuable is now suddenly of no value. The question can therefore be asked what is meant by the value concept as a foundation to modern-day accountancy.
"Value" is a concept that is open to different interpretations, based on the needs, perspectives and personal values of the interpreter. This article aims to reflect on the value concept from an accounting perspective in analysing the fundamental qualitative perspectives and how these perspectives might affect the quantitative value measurements, as reported in the financial statements. From a quantitative perspective, accounttancy aims to measure and report the monetary values of items. However, there is a move towards a mixed valuation model with many financial statements, including both historical cost and value-based accounting information.
The article concludes that this questionable development opens up many additional and subjective interpretations of accounting value measurement and reporting. Both valuation measurement methods have merit when considered in the overall purpose of accounting information. However, subjective value-based measurements may cast a shadow of doubt on the reliability and comparability requirements of accounting value information.

Key concepts: accountancy; accounting ethics; fair value accounting; stewardship; valuation; value measurement


OPSOMMING

Die onlangse ineenstorting van wêreldfinansies en die redes daarvoor mag veroorsaak dat baie mense die rentmeester-skapsfunksie van rekeningkunde bevraagteken. In die globale finansiële markte is daar 'n groot bekoring ten opsigte van die realiteit wat rekeningkundige waardes poog om te reflekteer. Wat baie mense egter voorheen as waardevol beskou het, het nou skielik geen waarde meer nie. Die vraag kan tereg gevra word wat met die konsep van waarde as 'n grondslag tot moderne rekeningkunde bedoel word.
"Waarde" is 'n konsep wat vir verskillende interpretasies oop is, gebaseer op die behoeftes, perspektiewe en persoonlike waardes van die individu. Hierdie artikel poog om op die waardekonsep vanuit 'n rekenmeesterskapsperspektief te reflekteer deur die kwalitatiewe aspekte te analiseer en die impak hiervan op die kwantitatiewe aspekte van waardebepaling en die verslagdoening daarvan, te evalueer. Vanuit 'n kwantitatiewe perspektief poog rekeningkunde om die monetêre waardes van items te meet en te rapporteer. Daar is egter 'n beweging na 'n gemengde waardasiemodel met baie finansiële state wat sowel historiese koste as waarde-gebaseerde rekeningkundige inligting bevat.
Die artikel bevind dat hierdie twyfelagtige ontwikkeling die deur oopmaak vir heelwat addisionele en subjektiewe interpretasies van rekeningkundige waardebepaling en verslagdoening. Albei waardasiemetodes het meriete, gesien in die lig van die oor-koepelende doel van rekeningkundige inligting. Nogtans mag subjektiewe billike-waarde-gebaseerde inligting 'n skadu van onsekerheid werp op die betroubaarheids- en vergelykbaar-heidsdoelstellings van rekeningkundige waarde-inligting.

Kernbegrippe: billike-waarde rekeningkunde; rekeningkundige etiek; rekenmeesterskap; rentmeesterskap; waardasie; waarde-bepaling


 

 

Full text available only in PDF format.

 

 

List of references

AICPA see AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS        [ Links ]

AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS. 2003. Code of professional conduct. http://ftp.aicpa.org/csc/cpcaf/ethics/ethics.doc#I1013 Date of access: 15 Apr. 2008.         [ Links ]

ANON. 2008. Oikos nomos: the economics of thought and some thoughts on economics. http://www.oikosnomos.org/oikos_nomos/ Date of access: 16 Apr. 2009.         [ Links ]

AUDI, R., ed. 2005. Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.         [ Links ]

BAIER, K. 1967. The concept of value. Presented at the Conference on Value Inquiry at the University of Akron, April 14-15.         [ Links ]

BIBLE NT. 2005. Good News Bible: today's English version. Roggebaai: Bible Society of South Africa.         [ Links ]

BIBLE NT. Greek. 1984. The interlinear Greek-English New Testament. Basingstoke: Sameul Bagster.         [ Links ]

BIBLE OT. 2005. Good News Bible: today's English version. Roggebaai: Bible Society of South Africa.         [ Links ]

BLACKBURY, S., ed. 1994. Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.         [ Links ]

BOTTON, N. 2007. Management accounting: business strategy. Amsterdam: Elsevier.         [ Links ]

BOYLES, J. 2008. Fair value accounting: are you ready? Strategic finance, 29-32, Aug.         [ Links ]

BRIEF ACCOUNTING DICTIONARY. 2000. Boston: Houghton Mifflen.         [ Links ]

BUYS, P.W. 2008. In pursuit of a foundational accountancy philosophy. Koers, 73(3):489-509.         [ Links ]

CAMPBELL, R.L., OWENS-JACKSON, L.A. & ROBINSON, D.R. 2008. Fair value accounting from theory to practice. Strategic finance, 31-37, Jul.         [ Links ]

CANADIAN INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS. 2007. The UFE candidates competency map: understanding the professional competencies evaluated by the UFE. http://www.cica.ca/download.cfm?ci_id=40906&la_id=1&re_id=0 Date of access: 15 Apr. 2008.         [ Links ]

CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANTS. 2003. Dictionary of Finance and Accounting. London: Bloomsbury.         [ Links ]

CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANTS. 2007. Management accounting: business strategy. Amsterdam: Elsevier.         [ Links ]

CHRISTENSEN, J. & FRIMOR, H. 2007. Fair value, accounting aggregation and multiple sources of information. (In Antle, R., Gjestal, F. & Liang, P.J., eds. Essays in accounting theory in honour of Joel S. Demski: Springer Science and Business Media. p. 35-51.         [ Links ])

CICA see CANADIAN INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS        [ Links ]

CIMA see CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANTS        [ Links ]

COMIM, F. 2004. The common sense of political economy of Philip Wicksteed. History of political economy, 36(3):475-495.         [ Links ]

DAMANT, D. 2006. Discussion of "International Financial Reporting Standards" (IFRS): pros and cons for investors. Accounting and business research, international policy forum, 29-30.         [ Links ]

DE WET, J.H. v.H. 2004. A strategic approach in managing shareholders' wealth for companies listed on the JSE Securities Exchange South Africa. Pretoria: University of Pretoria. (D.Comm. thesis.         [ Links ])

DEFERRARI, R.J. 1960. A Latin-English dictionary of St. Thomas Aquinas. Boston: Daughters of St. Paul.         [ Links ]

EAVES, P. 2007. Wall Street playing with more funny money. Fortune: 12 Nov. http://money.cnn.com/2007/11/12/magazines/fortune/eavis_ level3.fortune/?postversion=2007111212 Date of access: 19 Mar. 2009.         [ Links ]

EKELUND, R.B. & HÉBERT, R.F. 1990. A history of economic theory and method. New York: McGraw-Hill.         [ Links ]

EPSTEIN, B.J., NACH, R. & BRAGG, S.M. 2005. GAAP 2006: Interpretation and application of generally accepted accounting principles. New Jersey: Wiley.         [ Links ]

FASB see FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD        [ Links ]

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD. 2006. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No 157. Fair value measurement. Norwalk: Financial Accounting Standards Board.         [ Links ]

FORMAINI, R.L. 2002. Economic theory and public policy: do economists actually matter? http://www.dallasfed.org/news/educate/2002/02faculty_formaini.pdf Date of access: 30 Apr. 2009.         [ Links ]

GARDNER, J. 1989. Grendel. New York: Vintage Books.         [ Links ]

GEBLER, D. 2006. Creating an ethical culture: values-based ethics programs can help employees judge right from wrong. Strategic finance: 28-34, May.         [ Links ]

GORDON, B. 2005. Aristotle and Hesrod: the economic problem in Greek thought. Review of social economy, 62(3):395-440, Sept.         [ Links ]

GROSSMANN, H. 2007. Marx, classical economics, and the problem of dynamics. International journal of political economy, 36(2):6-83, Summer.         [ Links ]

HORNGREN, C.T., DATAR, S.M., FOSTER, G., RAJAN, M. & ITTNER, C. 2009. Cost accounting: a managerial emphasis. 13th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.         [ Links ]

HUNTER, S. 2008. Ethics: the framework for success. Strategic finance: 50-53, Apr.         [ Links ]

ICAEW see INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES        [ Links ]

IFRS see INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS        [ Links ]

IMA see INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANTS        [ Links ]

INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES. 2006. Members handbook: section 3 code of ethics. http://www.icaew.com/index.cfm?route=143703 Date of access: 15 Apr. 2008.         [ Links ]

INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANTS. 2008. Statement of ethical professional practice. http://www.imanet.org/aboutethics_statement.asp Date of access: 15 Apr. 2008.         [ Links ]

INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS. 2006. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs®). London: IASCF Publications Department.         [ Links ]

INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS. 2008. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs®). London: IASCF Publications Department.         [ Links ]

INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS. 2009. Fair value measurement. Presentation delivered as part of the IASB's project to provide guidance into fair value measurements in April 2009. London: IASC Foundation. (Unpublished.         [ Links ])

KAO, R.W.Y., KAO, K.R. & KAO, R.R. 2005. An entrepreneurial approach to stewardship accountability: corporate residual and global poverty. New Jersey: World Scientific.         [ Links ]

KING, A.M. 2009. Determining fair value. Strategic finance: 26-32, Jan.         [ Links ]

KLAMER, A. 2003. A pragmatic view on values in economics. Journal of economic methodology, 10(2):191 -212, Jun.         [ Links ]

KLEIN, P.G. 2008. The mundane economics of the Austrian school. Quarterly journal of Austrian economics, 11:165-187, Nov.         [ Links ]

KRUMWIEDE, T. 2008. Why historical cost accounting makes sense. Strategic finance: 33-39, Aug.         [ Links ]

LANGHOLM, D. 2006a. Monopoly and market irregularities in medieval economic thought: traditions and texts to A.D. 1500. Journal of economic history of economic thought, 28(4):395-411, Dec.         [ Links ]

LANGHOLM, D. 2006b. Buridan on value and economic measurement. History of practical economy, 38(2):269-289.         [ Links ]

LIBBY, R., LIBBY, P.A. & SHORT, D.G. 1996. Financial accounting. Chicago: Irwin.         [ Links ]

LIVINGSTONE, C., ed. 2008. Oxford mini dictionary and thesaurus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.         [ Links ]

MATTESSICH, R. 2003. Accounting research and researchers of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century: an international survey of authors, ideas and publications. Accounting, business and financial history, 125-170, Jul.         [ Links ]

MILLER, W.D. 2008. The fatal flaw in SFAS No. 157. Strategic finance: 40-47, Aug.         [ Links ]

MITCHELL, R.K., AGLE, B.R. & WOOD, D.J. 1997. Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. The academy of management review, 22(4):853-886, Oct.         [ Links ]

MOHON, R. 1999. Stewardship ethics in debt management. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.         [ Links ]

MOHR, P. & FOURIE, L. 2004. Economics for South African students. 3rd ed. Pretoria: Van Schaik.         [ Links ]

MUNDELL, R.A. 1968. Man and economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.         [ Links ]

PERRY, J. & NÖLKE, A. 2006. The political economy of international accounting standards. Review of international political economy, 13(4):559-586, Oct.         [ Links ]

PINDYCK, R.S. & RUBINFELD, D.L. 2005. Microeconomics. 6th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.         [ Links ]

PRING, J.T., ed. 1982. The Oxford dictionary of modern Greek: English-Greek. Oxford: Oxford University Press.         [ Links ]

REIS, R.F. & STOCKEN, P.C. 2007. Strategic consequences of historical cost and fair value measurements. Contemporary accounting research, 24(2):557-584.         [ Links ]

RIAHI-BELKAOUI, A. 2000. Accounting theory. 4th ed. London: Thomson Learning.         [ Links ]

RICHTER, M.K. 1971. Rational choice. (In Chipman, J.S., Hurwicz, L., Richter, M.K. & Sonnenschein, H.F., eds. Preferences, utility, and demand. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. p. 29-58.         [ Links ])

RONEN, J. 2008. To fair value or not to fair value: a broader perspective. Abacus, 44(2):181-208.         [ Links ]

RYAN, S.G. 2008. Accounting in and for the subprime crisis. The accounting review, 83(6):1605-1638, Nov.         [ Links ]

SCHROEDER, R.G., CLARK, M.W. & CATHEY, J.M. 2005. Financial accounting theory and analysis. 8th ed. New Jersey: Wiley.         [ Links ]

SCHUMPETER, J.A. 1954. History of economic analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.         [ Links ]

SCOTT, W.R. 2003. Financial accounting theory. 3rd ed. Toronto: Prentice-Hall.         [ Links ]

STARK, R. 2005. The victory of reason: how Christianity led to freedom, capitalism, and Western success. New York: Random House.         [ Links ]

STIGLER, G.J. 1950. The development of utility theory 2. Journal of political economy, 58(5):373-396, Oct.         [ Links ]

STIGLER, G.J. 1972. The adoption of marginal utility theory. History of political economy, 4(2):571-586.         [ Links ]

STIGLITZ, J.E. 2004. Information and the change in the paradigm in economics. (In Szenberg, M. & Ramrattan, L., eds. New frontiers in economics. Cambridge University Press. p. 27-67.         [ Links ])

SUNDEM, G.L. 2007. A note on the information perspective and the conceptual framework. (In Antle, R., Gjestal, F. & Liang, P.J., eds. Essays in accounting theory in honour of Joel S. Demski. Springer: Science and Business Media. p. 285-292.         [ Links ])

SWANSON, D.C. 1959. Vocabulary of modern spoken Greek. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.         [ Links ]

TAYLOR, J.B. 2004. Principle of microeconomics. 4th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflen.         [ Links ]

USHER, A.P. 1917. The content of the value concept. The quarterly journal of economics, 31(4):711-718, Aug.         [ Links ]

VAN CAUWENBERGE, P. & DE BEELDE, I. 2007. On the IASB comprehensive income project: an analysis of the case for dual income display. Abacus, 43(1):1-26.         [ Links ]

VERSCHOOR, C. 2009. Economic crime results from unethical culture. Strategic finance: 13-15, Jul.         [ Links ]

WARSHALL, P. 2009. Escaping eco-echolalia: is there a common language for ecology and economics? Whole earth review. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1510/is_n79/ai_13805370/ Date of access: 17 Apr. 2009.         [ Links ]

WEBSTER'S DICTIONARY AND THESAURUS. 2006. New Lanark: Geddes & Grosset.         [ Links ]

WILBER, C.K. 2004. Ethics and social economics: ASE presidential address, January 2004. Review of social economy, 62(4):425-439, Dec.         [ Links ]

WILD, J.J. 2008. Financial accounting: information for decisions. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.         [ Links ]

YOUNG, A.A. 1911. Some limitations of the value concept. The quarterly journal of economics, 25:409-428, May.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License