SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.74 número3Wolterstorff's critique of the reformational view of scholarship in his essay On Christian learning índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados



Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google



versión On-line ISSN 2304-8557
versión impresa ISSN 0023-270X

Koers (Online) vol.74 no.3 Pretoria  2009


A perspective on (neo-)Darwinism (2010)


'n Perspektief op die (neo-)Darwinisme (2010)



D.F.M. Strauss

Faculty of the Humanities, University of Free State, Bloemfontein. E-mail:




A perspective on (neo-)Darwinism first of all has to account for those assumptions derived from the humanities, causing neo-Darwinism not to be a purely special scientific or natural scientific theory. A discussion of the many-sidedness of living entities highlights the difficulties surrounding a definition of biology. Attention is briefly given to the physicalism of Darwin's 1859 work before the quest for origins is discussed. These considerations pave the way for an assessment of striking shortcomings in the thought of Darwin and his followers. In particular, modern nominalism is identified as an important source for neo-Darwinism, especially manifest in the idea that organisms are not types and do not have types (Simpson). Darwin's idea of incremental (continuous) change both in respect of the genesis of a complex organ (or the origination of the first living entity) and of successive fossil forms contradict the current state of affairs - and the same applies to his own radical idea that "injurious" variations will be eliminated immediately by natural selection, for it cannot be reconciled to the role of mutations in neo-Darwinian theory. In addition neo-Darwinian paleontologists pointed out that evolution requires intermediate forms and paleontology does not provide them (Kitts) and explicitly confessed that they have paid lip-service to the idea of change while they knew all the time that it was not true (Eldredge): the dominant theme of the paleontological record is stasis, constancy - a type appears and remains constant for millions of years before it disappears (Gould). The supposition of incremental continuity received a further blow from the "Cambrian explosion", the "nasty fact" that most "major animal groups appeared simultaneously" about 530 million years ago. A few aspects of the uniqueness of humankind are treated as well as the confused picture found in an attempt to synthesise neo-Darwinism and Christianity. In an appendix a brief assessment is added concerning the pretentions of neo-Darwinism.

Key concepts: attempted synthesis:Christianity and evolution; continuity and discontinuity; Neo-Darwinism; origin of life; paleontology; schools of thought


'n Perspektief op die neo-Darwinisme moet allereers rekenskap gee van daardie geesteswetenskaplike aannames wat daartoe gelei het dat die neo-Darwinisme nie 'n suiwer vakweten-skaplike teorie en ook nie 'n suiwer natuurwetenskaplike teorie is nie. 'n Bespreking van die veelsydigheid van lewende dinge belig die probleme verbonde aan 'n definisie van die biologie. Aandag is vlugtig gegee aan die fisikalisme van Darwin se 1859-werk alvorens die sug na oorspronge bespreek is. Hierdie oorwegings het die weg gebaan vir 'n beoordeling van die treffende tekortkomings in die denke van Darwin en sy volgelinge. In die besonder is die moderne nominalisme geïdentifiseer as 'n belangrike bron vir die neo-Darwinisme, veral gemanifesteer in die idee dat organismes nie tipes is of tipes kan hê nie (Simpson). Darwin se idee van geleidelik (kontinue) verandering ten opsigte van die ontstaan van 'n komplekse orgaan (of die ontstaan van die eerste lewende entiteit) asook van opeenvolgende fossielvorms is in stryd met die huidige stand van sake - en dieselfde geld vir sy eie radikale siening dat "nadelige" variasies onmiddellik deur natuurlike seleksie geëlimineer sal word, want dit kan nie versoen word met die rol van mutasies in die neo-Darwinistiese teorie nie. Bykomend het neo-Darwinistiese paleontoloë daarop gewys dat evolusie tussenvorms vereis en dat die paleontologie dit nie lewer nie (Kitts). Hulle het openlik bely dat hulle lippediens gelewer het aan die vermeende verandering in the paleontologie terwyl hulle al die tyd geweet het dit is nie waar nie (Eldredge): die dominante tema van die paleontologie is stasis, konstantheid - 'n tipe verskyn en bly konstant vir miljoene jare alvorens dit verdwyn (Gould). Die aanname van geleidelik-kontinue verandering het 'n verdere terugslag ontvang van die "Cambrian explosion", die "nasty fact" dat die meeste "major animal groups appeared simultaneously" omtrent 530 miljoen jaar gelede. Enkele fasette van die uniekheid van die mens is aan die orde gestel asook die verwarde prentjie wat aangetref word in 'n poging om die neo-Darwinisme met die Christendom te versoen. In 'n aanhangsel word 'n oorsigtelike beoordeling van die pretensies van die neo-Darwinisme behandel.

Kernbegrippe: denkskole; gepoogde sintese: Christendom en evolusie; kontinuïteit en diskontinuïteit; Neo-Darwinisme; ontstaan van lewe; paleontologie



Full text available only in PDF format.



List of references

BAVINK, B. 1954: Ergebnisse und Probleme der Naturwissenschaften, Zürich: Hirzel.         [ Links ]

BEHE, M.J. 2003a. Design in the details: the origin of biomolecular machines. (In Campbell, J.A. & Meyer, S.C. Darwinism, design, and public education. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press. p. 287-302.         [ Links ])

BEHE, M.J. 2003b. Darwin's black box: the biochemical challenge to evolution. New York: Free Press.         [ Links ]

BERLINSKI, D. 2003. The deniable Darwin. (In Campbell, J.A. & Meyer, S.C. Darwinism, design, and public education. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press. p. 157-177.         [ Links ])

CASSIRER, E. 1969 [1910]. Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

CLOUSER, R.A. 2005. The myth of religious neutrality: an essay on the hidden role of religious belief in theories. New revised ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.         [ Links ]

COLLINS, F. 2007. The language of God. New York: Simon & Schuster.         [ Links ]

COYNE, J.A. 2009. Why evolution is true. Oxford: Oxford University Press.         [ Links ]

DACQUÉ, E. 1935. Organische morphologie and phylogenie. Berlin: De Gruyter.         [ Links ]

DACQUÉ, E. 1940. Die Urgestalt. Leipzig: Im Insel.         [ Links ]

DACQUÉ, E. 1948. Vermächtnis der Urzeit. München: Leibniz.         [ Links ]

DARWIN, C. 1859b. On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. Date of access: 29 Oct. 2005.         [ Links ]

DARWIN, C. 1968 [1859a]. On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. Ed. with an introduction by J.W. Burrow. Hardmondsworth: Penguin Books. (The version available on the WEB (see Darwin, 1859b) slightly differs in some respects from the Penguin edition.)

DAWKINS, R. 1986. The blind watchmaker: why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design. New York: Norton.         [ Links ]

DEKKER, C., MEESTER, R. & VAN WOUDENBERG, R. 2006. Schitterend ongeluk of sporen van ontwerp? Kampen: Ten Have.         [ Links ]

DEPEW, D. 2003. Intelligent design and irreducible complexity: a rejoinder. (In Campbell, J.A. & Meyer, S.C. Darwinism, design, and public education. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press. p. 441-454.         [ Links ])

DOBZHANSKY, Th. 1967. The biology of ultimate concern. New York: New American Library.         [ Links ]

DRIESCH, H. 1929. The science and philosophy of the organism. 2nd ed. London: Black.         [ Links ]

DUYVENÉ DE WIT, J.J. 1962. Evolution as Christocentrically directed process. (In De Chardin, Teilhard. Christian perspective. Hamilton: Guardian Publishing. p. 53-70.         [ Links ])

EISENSTEIN, I. 1975a. Ist die Evolutionstheorie wissenschaftlich begründet? Philosophia naturalis: Archiv für Naturphilosophie und die philosophischen Grenzgebiete der exakten Wissenschaften und Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 15(3):Teil 1.         [ Links ]

EISENSTEIN, I. 1975b. Ist die Evolutionstheorie wissenschaftlich begründet? Philosophia Naturalis: Archiv für Naturphilosophie und die philosophischen Grenzgebiete der exakten Wissenschaften und Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 15(3):Teil 2.         [ Links ]

GENTRY, R.V. 2001. Flaws in the big bang. arXiv:physics/0102096. Date of access: 28 Sept. 2009.         [ Links ]

GOULD, S.J. 1992. Reflections in natural history: ever since Darwin. New York: Norton.         [ Links ]

GOULD, S.J. 1996. Life's grandeur. London: Vintage.         [ Links ]

GOULD, S.J. 2002. The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.         [ Links ]

HAAS, J. 1959. Naturphilosophische Betrachtungen zur Finalität und Abstammungslehre. (In Haas, A. Die stammesgeschichtliche Werden der Organismen und des Menschen. Vol. 1. Basel: Herder. S. 453-514.         [ Links ])

HAAS, J. 1968. Sein und Leben: Ontologie des organischen Lebens. Karlsruhe: Badenia.         [ Links ]

HAAS, J. 1974. Das organische Leben. (In Huttenbugel, J., ed. Gott, Mensch, Universum. Graz: Styria. S. 325-356.         [ Links ])

HEISENBERG, W. 1958. Physics and philosophy: the revolution in modern science. New York: Harper Torchbooks.         [ Links ]

HEITLER, W. 1976. Ueber die Komplementarität von Lebloser und lebender Materie. Abhandlungen der mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse, (1):1-23, Mainz.         [ Links ]

HILBERT, D. 1925. Über das Unendliche. Mathematische Annalen, 95(1925):161-190.         [ Links ]

HUXLEY, J. 1968. Evolution in action. Hammondsworth: Penguin.         [ Links ]

JONAS, H. 1973. Organismus und Freiheit: Ansätze zu einer philosophischen Biologie. München: VandenHoeck.         [ Links ]

KANT, I. 1956 [1787]. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. 2. Ed. Hamburg: Felix Meiner. (References to CPR B.         [ Links ])

KANT, I. 1969 [1783]. Prolegomena einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.

KITTS, D.B. 1974. Paleontology and evolutionary theory. Evolution, 28:458-472, Sept.         [ Links ]

KLAPWIJK, J. 2008. Purpose in the living world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.         [ Links ]

KLEE, R. 1997. Introduction to the philosophy of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.         [ Links ]

KLEIN, G. 1990. The atheist in the holy city. Cambridge: MIT.         [ Links ]

LAITMAN, J.T. 1985. Evolution of the upper respiratory tract: the fossil evidence. (In Tobias, P.V., ed. Hominid evolution., New York: Liss. p. 281-286.         [ Links ])

LEINFELLER, W. 1966. Ueber die Karpelle verschiedener Magnoliales. Tl. 1. Oesterreichische Botanische Zeitschrift, 113: 383-389.         [ Links ]

LENNOX, J.C. 2007. God's undertaker. Has science buried God? Oxford: Lion.         [ Links ]

LORENZ, K. 1973. Ueber tierisches und menschliches Verhalten: aus dem Werdegang der Verhaltenslehre. München: Piper. (Gesammelte Abhandlungen, Vol. 2.         [ Links ])

LORENZEN, P. 1976. Zur Definition der vier fundamentalen Meßgrößen. Philosophia naturalis, 16:1-9.         [ Links ]

LORENZEN, P. 1989. Geometry as the measure-theoretic a priori of physics. (In Butts, R.E. & Brown, J.R., eds. Constructivism and science. Dordrecht: Kluwer. p. 127-144.         [ Links ])

MAIER, A. 1949. Die Vorläufer Galileis im 14. Jahrhundert. Roma: Storia e letteratura.         [ Links ]

MCGRATH, A.E. 1999. The foundations of dialogue in science & religion. Oxford: Blackwell.         [ Links ]

MEYER, A. 1964. The historico-philosophic background of modern evolution-biology. Leiden: Bril.         [ Links ]

MEYER, A. 1965. Gedanken zur Theorie und Philosophie des Organismus. Leopoldina, 10.         [ Links ]

MEYER, A. 1966. Gedanken zur Theorie und Philosophie des Organismus. Leopoldina, 11.         [ Links ]

MILLS, G.C., LANCASTER, M. & BRADLEY, W.L. 2003. Origin of life and evolution in biology textbooks: a critique. (In Campbell, J.A. & Meyer, S.C. Darwinism, design, and public education. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press. p. 208-219.         [ Links ])

MUNSON, R., ed. 1971. Man and nature: philosophical issues in biology. New York: Dell.         [ Links ]

NARR, K.J. 1974. Tendenzen in der Urgeschichtsforschung. (In Luyten, N.A., ed. Fortschritt im heutigen Denken? Freiburg: Alber. Görres-Gesellschaft für Interdisziplinäre Forschung. Series: Grenzfragen, Vol. 4. p. 85-125.         [ Links ])

NARR, K.J. 1976. Cultural achievements of early man. (In Altner, G. & Hofer, H. Die Sonderstellung des Menschen. Stuttgart: Fischer.         [ Links ])

NEURATH, O. 1959. Sociology and physicalism. (In Ayer, A.J. Logical positivism. New York: Free Press. p. 282-317.) (Originally published in Erkenntnis, 1931/32.         [ Links ])

OEING-HANOFF, L. 1976. Individuum, individualität - Hoch- und Spätskolastik. (In Ritter, J., Gründer, K. & Gabriel, G., Reds. Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Tl. 4. Basel-Stuttgart: Schwabe. S. 304-310.         [ Links ])

OPARIN, A.I. 1953. Origin of life. New York: Dover.         [ Links ]

ORGEL, L.E. 1998. The origin of life: a review of facts and speculations. Trends in biochemical sciences, 23(1998):491-500.         [ Links ]

ORGEL, L.E. & SULSTON, J.E. 1971. Polynucleotide replication and the origin of life. (In Kimball, A.P. & Oro, J. 1971. Prebiotic and biochemical evolution. Amsterdam: North-Holland. p. 89-94.         [ Links ])

OVERHAGE, P. 1972. Der Affe in dir. Frankfurt am Main: Josef Knecht.         [ Links ]

POLANYI, M. 1967. Life transcending physics and chemistry. Chemical engineering news, 45:54-66, Aug.         [ Links ]

POLANYI, M. 1968. Life's irreducible structure. Science, 160(21):1308-1312.         [ Links ]

POLANYI, M. 1969. Personal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago.         [ Links ]

RAUCHE, G.A. 1966. The problem of truth and reality in Grisebach's thought, Pretoria: Van Schaik.         [ Links ]

RENSCH, B. 1959. Evolution above the species level. London: Methuen.         [ Links ]

RENSCH, B. 1968. Discussion remarks, attached to Von Bertalanffy: symbolismus and anthropogenese. (In Rensch, B. & Schultz, A.H., Reds. 1968. Handgebrauch und Verständigung bei Affen und Frühmenschen. Symposium der Werner-Reimers-Stiftung für anthropogenetische Forschung. Bern: Huber. S. 172-173.         [ Links ])

RENSCH, B. 1969. Die fünffache Wurzel des panpsychistischen Identismus. Philosophia naturalis, 11.         [ Links ]

RENSCH, B.1971. Biophilosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.         [ Links ]

RENSCH, B. 1973. Gedächtnis, Begriffsbildung und Planhandlungen bei Tieren. Hamburg: Parey.         [ Links ]

SCHINDEWOLF, O.H. 1969. Ueber den "Typus" in morphologischer und phylogenetischer Biologie. Wiesbaden: Monograph.         [ Links ]

SCHINDEWOLF, O.H. 1980. Grundfragen der Paläontologie. New York: Arno.         [ Links ]

SCHUBERT-SOLDERN, R. 1959. Materie und Leben als Raum und Zeitgestalt. München: Pustet.         [ Links ]

SCHUBERT-SOLDERN, R. 1962. Mechanism and vitalism: philosophical aspects of biology. Ed. by P.G. Fothergill. Foreword to the American ed. by J.P. Doll. Trans. by C.E. Robin. Notre Dame: Indiana University of Notre Dame Press.         [ Links ]

SILVER, B.L. 1998. The ascent of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.         [ Links ]

SIMPSON, G.G. 1969. Biology and man. New York: Harcourt.         [ Links ]

SIMPSON, G.G. 1971. Man's place in nature. Section from "The Meaning of Evolution". Revised edition. (In Munson R., ed. Man and nature: philosophical issues in biology. New York: Dell. p. 268-278.         [ Links ])

SINNOTT, E.W. 1963. The problem of organic form. London: New Haven.         [ Links ]

SINNOTT, E.W. 1972: Matter, mind and man: the biology of human nature. New York: Atheneum.         [ Links ]

SOBER, E. 1987. The nature of selection: evolutionary theory in philosophical focus. London: MIT.         [ Links ]

STAFLEU, M.D. 1980. Time and again: a systematic analysis of the foundations of physics. Toronto: Wedge Publishing Foundation.         [ Links ]

STERELNY, K. 2001. Dawkins vs. Gould: survival of the fittest. London: Icon Books.         [ Links ]

STRAUSS, D.F.M. 2006. Filosofiese tendense in die wordingsgeskiedenis van ons verstaan van die fisiese natuur. Akademie tydskrif vir natuurwetenskappe, 25(2):93-110.         [ Links ]

STRAUSS, D.F.M. 2007. Did Darwin develop a theory of evolution in the biological sense of the word? South African journal of philosophy, 26(2):190-203.         [ Links ]

STRAUSS, D.F.M. 2009. Philosophy: disciplines of the disciplines. Grand Rapids: Paideia.         [ Links ]

TOL, T. 1995. Time and change in Vollenhoven. Philosophia reformata, 60(2):99-120.         [ Links ]

TRINCHER, K. 1985. Die Dualität der Materie. Philosophia naturalis, 22(3):329-342.         [ Links ]

TROLL, W. 1951. Biomorphologie und Biosystematik als typologische Wissenschaften. Studium Generale, 4:376-389.         [ Links ]

TROLL, W. 1973. Allgemeine Botanik. Revised and extended edition. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke.         [ Links ]

UNGERER, E. 1966. Die Wissenschaft vom Leben. Teil 3: Der Wandel der Problemelage der Biologie in den letzten Jahrzehten. Freiburg: Alber.         [ Links ]

VAN DEN BEUKEL, A. 2006. Darwinisme: wetenschap en/of ideologie? (In Dekker, C., Meester, R. & Van Woudenberg, R. Schitterend ongeluk of sporen van ontwerp? Kampen: Ten Have. p. 101-116.         [ Links ])

VAN HUYSSTEEN, J.W. 1998. Duet or duel? Theology and science in a portmodern world. Harrisburg: Trinity Press.         [ Links ]

VAN HUYSSTEEN, J.W. 2006. Alone in the world? Human uniqueness in science and theology. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.         [ Links ]

VAN RIESSEN, H. 1970. Wijsbegeerte. Kampen: Kok.         [ Links ]

VON BERTALANFFY, L. 1973. General system theory. Hammondsworth: Penguin.         [ Links ]

VON FRITZ, K. 1945. The discovery of incommensurability by Hippasus of Metapontum. Annals of mathematics, 46:242-264.         [ Links ]

VON WEISZÄCKER, C.F. 1993. Der Mensch in seiner Geschichte. München: Deutsche Theologische Verein.         [ Links ]

WEINERT, F. 1998. Fundamental physical constants, null experiments and the Duhem-Quine thesis. Philosohpia naturalis, 35:225-251.         [ Links ]

WELLS, J. 2003. Second thoughts about peppered moths. (In Campbell, J.A. & Meyer, S.C. Darwinism, design, and public education. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press. p. 187-192.         [ Links ])

WOLF, K.L. 1951. Urbildliche Betrachtung. Studium Generale, 4:365-375.         [ Links ]

WOLTERECK, R. 1940. Ontologie des Lebendigen. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke.         [ Links ]

WUKETITS, F.M. 1990. Evolutionary epistemology and its implications for humankind. New York: State University Plaza.         [ Links ]

ZYLSTRA, U. 2004. Intelligent-design theory: an argument for biotic laws. Zygon, 39(1):175-191.         [ Links ]



1 This article was first presented as a Stoker Lecture in Potchefstroom on 22 October 2009.

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons