KOMMUNIKASIE

 

Kommunikasiekunde in Suid-Afrika: Die begin, die hede en uitdagings vir die toekoms

 

Communication science in South Africa: The beginnings, the present and challenges for the future

 

 

P.J. Fourie

Departement Kommunikasiewetenskap, Universiteit van Suid-Afrika, Pretoria. E-pos: fouripj@unisa.ac.za

 

 

---

OPSOMMING

Hierdie artikel is gebaseer op die Gert Pienaar-gedenklesing wat op 27 Augustus 2009 deur die outeur van hierdie artikel in die Skool vir Kommunikasiestudies van die Noordwes-Universiteit gelewer is. Wyle professor Gert Pienaar was vyftig jaar gelede die stigter van Kommunikasiewetenskap (toe Perswetenskap) in Suid-Afrika. Behalwe om hulde aan professor Pienaar te bring, was die doel van die lesing en die doel van hierdie artikel om die hoofstroomnavorsingsparadigmas wat kommunikasienavorsing die afgelope vyftig jaar in Suid-Afrika gerig het, kortliks weer te gee. Dit is naamlik, die positivistiese paradigma (of die bestuursparadigma) en die kritiese paradigma. In hierdie artikel word aangevoer dat normatiewe vrae oor die rol en funksies van die media in die samelewing hierdie paradigmas onderlê. Teen die agtergrond van nuwer paradigmas, soos die postmoderne en die postkoloniale paradigmas, word die toepasbaarheid en die relevansie van ou normatiewe mediateorieë in 'n nuwe samelewing en in 'n nuwe medialandskap bevraagteken en die Westerse bevooroordeeldheid daarvan beklemtoon. Teen hierdie agtergrond word vier navorsingsgebiede vir toekomstige Suid-Afrikaanse kommunikasienavorsing belig: fundamentele navorsing oor nuwe media, ontwikke-lingskommunikasienavorsing vanuit 'n Afrikaperspektief, kommunikasiebeleidsnavorsing, en navorsing oor die verinheem-sing van massakommunikasieteorie.

Kernbegrippe: inheemse teorie; kommunikasiebeleid; massakommunikasie; navorsingsparadigmas; normatiewe mediateorie; nuwe media; ontwikkelingskommunikasie; verinheemsing van teorie

---

ABSTRACT

This article is based on the Gert Pienaar Commemorative Lecture given by the author of this article on 27 August 2009 at the North-West University, Potchefstroom. The late Professor Gert Pienaar founded communication science (then Press Science) in South Africa, fifty years ago. Apart from acknowledging his contribution, the purpose of the lecture and of this article is to briefly outline the main research paradigms which have guided South African mass communication research the past fifty years, namely the positivist (or managerial) paradigm and the critical paradigm. It is argued that normative questions about the role and functions of the media in society underlie these paradigms. Against the background of new paradigms such as the postmodern and postcolonial paradigms (of which the basic tenets are also outlined) the applicability and relevance of old normative media theory in a new society and in a new media landscape (briefly described) are questioned and the Western prejudice of "old" normative theory is highlighted. With this in mind, four research areas for future South African mass communication research are emphasised, namely fundamental new media research, development communication research from an African perspective, communications policy research, and the indigenisation of mass communication theory.

Key concepts: communications policy; development communication; indigenising of theory; indigenous theory; mass communication; new media; normative media theory; research paradigms

---

 

 

Full text available only in PDF format.

 

 

Geraadpleegde bronne

ALLAN, S., ed. 2005. Journalism: critical issues. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.         [ Links ]

ANG, I. 1998. The performance of the sponge: mass communication theory enters the postmodern world. (In Brants, K., Hermes, J. & Van Zoonen, L., eds. The media in question: popular cultures and public interests. London: Sage. p. 77-88.         [ Links ])

ANSU-KYEREMEH, K., ed. 2005. Indigenous communication in Africa: concept, application and prospects. Accra: Ghana University Press.         [ Links ]

BAUDRILLARD, J. 1987. The evil demon of images. Sydney: Power Institute.         [ Links ]

BRANTS, K. 1998. With the benefit of hindsight: old nightmares and new dreams. (In Brants, K., Hermes, J. & Van Zoonen, L., eds. The media in question: popular cultures and public interests. London: Sage. p. 169-179.         [ Links ])

CASTELLS, M. 1998. End of millennium: the information age: economy, society and culture. Oxford: Blackwell.         [ Links ]

COULDRY, N. 2004. Theorising media as practice. Social semiotics, 14(2):115-132.         [ Links ]

CURRAN, J. & PARK, M-J. 2000. De-Westernizing media-studies. London: Routledge.         [ Links ]

DANESI, M. 2002. Understanding media semiotics. London: Arnold.         [ Links ]

DIRLIK, A. 2002. Reversals, ironies, hegemonies: notes on the contemporary historiography of modern China. (In Dirlik, A., Bahl, V. & Gran, P., eds. History after the three worlds: post-Eurocentric historiographies. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. p. 125-156.         [ Links ])

DOWNING, J. 1996. Internationalising media theory. London: Sage.         [ Links ]

DREYFUS, H.L. 2001. On the internet. London: Routledge.         [ Links ]

FOURIE, P.J. 2007(a). Approaches to the study of mass communication. (In Fourie, P.J., ed. Media studies. Vol. 1: Media history, media and society. 2nd ed. Cape Town: Juta. p.115-183.         [ Links ])

FOURIE, P.J. 2007(b). Moral philosophy as the foundation of normative media theory: the case of African ubuntuism. Communications (European journal of communication research), 32(2007):1-29.         [ Links ]

GIDDENS, A. 1990. The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.         [ Links ]

GUNARATNE, S.A. 2005. The dao of the press: a humanocentric theory. Cresskill: Hampton.         [ Links ]

HARTLEY, J. 1999. Uses of television. London: Routledge.         [ Links ]

JACKA, E. 2003. Democracy as defeat: the impotence of arguments for public service broadcasting. Television and new media, 4(2):177-191.         [ Links ]

MCNAIR, B. 2005. The emerging chaos of global news culture. (In Allan, S., ed. Journalism: critical issues. Berkshire: Open University Press. p. 151-167.         [ Links ])

MCQUAIL, D. 2005. McQuail's mass communication theory. 5th ed. London: Sage.         [ Links ]

POSTER, M. 2001. What's the matter with the internet? Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.         [ Links ]

SHOME, R. & HOGDE, R. 2002. Postcolonial approaches to communication: charting the terrain, engaging the intersections. Communication theory, 12(3):249-270.         [ Links ]

SIEBERT, F.S., PETERSON, T.B. & SCHRAMM, W. 1956. Four theories of the press. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.         [ Links ]

SLATER, D. 2004. Social relationships and identity online and offline. (In Allen R.C. & Hill, A., eds. The television studies reader. London: Routledge. p. 596-615.         [ Links ])

SNYMAN, P.G. 1971. Pers en leser: 'n prinsipiële voorstudie tot die persetiek. Potchefstroom: Pro Rege. (D.Phil. - verhandeling.         [ Links ])

VAN DRIEL, H. 2003. Identiteit in een digitale kultuur. http:/comcom.uvt.nl/e-view/inhoud.htm Datum van gebruik: 17 Nov. 2003.         [ Links ]

WASSERMAN, H. 2006. Globalized values and postcolonial responses: South African perspectives on normative media ethics. The international communication gazette, 68(1 ):71 -91.         [ Links ]

WHITE, R.A. 2008. Grassroots participatory communication: is a new vision of communication emerging in Africa. African communication research, 1(1):11-45, May.         [ Links ]