SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.74 número1-2Teacher education in South Africa: Noteworthy aspects from other systemsModern (financial) slavery índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados



Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google



versão On-line ISSN 2304-8557
versão impressa ISSN 0023-270X

Koers (Online) vol.74 no.1-2 Pretoria  2009




Mentoring novice researchers in higher education: A "communities of practice" perspective


Die mentor van ontwikkelende navorsers in hoëronderwys: 'n "Gemeenskap van praktisyns"-perspektief



S. Schulze

Department of Further Teacher Education, Unisa, Pretoria. E-mail:




This article reports on the mentoring of novice researchers, in particular of women and black academics, at a South African higher education institution. The model used for mentoring was informed by a "communities of practice" perspective which used situated and constructivist learning theories as a conceptual framework. One mentor and eleven protégés were involved. The protégés were divided into three groups of two, four and five participants each. Each group functioned as a community of practice (CoP) and embarked on a research project of its own choice. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the mentoring model, and therefore it explains the participants' views of their learning and development from a CoP perspective. Data were collected by means of interviews and observation. The findings indicate how the development of the protégés from legitimate peripheral to more central participation was influenced by the university context, activities and relationships in each CoP, and participants' individual dispositions. Recommendations to improve the model and for further study are made.

Key concepts: communities of practice; constructivist learning; higher education; mentoring; research development; situated learning


Hierdie artikel doen verslag oor die mentorskap van ontwikkelende navorsers, wat veral vroue en swart akademici insluit, by 'n Suid-Afrikaans hoëronderwysinstansie. Die mentormodel wat gebruik is, is deur 'n "gemeenskap van praktisyns" (GvP)-perspektief beïnvloed wat gesitueerde en konstruktiwistiese leerteorieë as konseptuele raamwerk gebruik het. Een mentor en elf protégés is betrek. Laasgenoemde is verdeel in drie groepe van twee, vier, en vyf deelnemers elk. Elke groep het gefunksioneer as 'n GvP met 'n navorsingsprojek van hulle eie keuse. Die studie het ten doel om die mentormodel te evalueer. Dit verduidelik dus die deelnemers se sienings van hulle leer en ontwikkeling vanuit 'n GvP-perspektief. Data-in-sameling is deur middel van onderhoude en observasie ge-doen. Bevindings toon aan hoe hulle ontwikkeling van wettige, periferale deelname na meer sentrale deelname beïnvloed is deur die universiteitskonteks, aktiwiteite en verhoudings in die GvP en hulle eie gesindhede. Aanbevelings om die model te verbeter asook vir verdere navorsing word ook aangetoon.

Kernbegrippe: gemeenskap van praktisyns; gesitueerde leer; hoër onderwys; konstruktiwistiese leer; mentor; navorsingsontwikkling



Full text available only in PDF format.



List of references

BARKER, M.J. 2007. Cross-cultural mentoring in institutional contexts. Negro educational review, 58(1/2):85-104.         [ Links ]

BLUNT, R.J.S. & CONOLLY, J. 2006. Perceptions of mentoring: expectations of a key resource for higher education. South African journal of higher education, 20(2):195-208.         [ Links ]

CLARK, R.A., HARDEN, S.L. & JOHNSON, W.B. 2000. Mentor relationships in clinical psychology doctoral training: results of a national survey. Teaching of psychology, 27:262-268.         [ Links ]

CRUTCHER, B.N. 2007. Mentoring across cultures. Academe, 93(4):44-49.         [ Links ]

CUNNINGHAM, S. 1999. The nature of workplace mentoring relationships among faculty members in Christian higher education. The Journal of higher education, 70(4):441 -463.         [ Links ]

FOX, R. 2001. Constructivism examined. Oxford review of education, 27(1):23-35.         [ Links ]

GAZZA, E.A. 2004. Establishing a supportive culture through mentorship. Phi Kappa Phi Forum, 84(4):47.         [ Links ]

GOODWIN, L.D., STEVENS, E.A. & BELLAMY, G.T. 1998. Mentoring among faculty in schools, colleges, and departments of education. Journal of teacher education, 49(5):334-343.         [ Links ]

HANDLEY, K., STURDY, A., FINCHAM, R. & CLARK, T. 2006. Within and beyond communities of practice: making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. Journal of management studies, 43(3):641-653.         [ Links ]

HENRY, J.S., STOCKDALE, M.S., HALL, M. & DENISTON, W. 1994. A formal mentoring program for junior female faculty: description and evaluation. Initiatives, 56(2):37-45.         [ Links ]

HENZE, M.E. 2009. Demystifying "constructivism": teasing unnecessary baggage from useful pedagogy. Christian education journal, 6(1):87-111.         [ Links ]

HODGES, D.C. 1998. Participation as dis-identification with/in a community of practice. Mind, culture and activity, 5(4):272-290.         [ Links ]

HODKINSON, P. & HODKINSON, H. 2003. Individuals, communities of practice and the policy context: school teachers' learning in their workplace. Studies in continuing education, 25(1):3-21.         [ Links ]

HODKINSON, P. & HODKINSON, H. 2008. Rethinking communities of practice: a case study of schoolteachers' workplace learning.,Paper%20141.htm Date of access: 13 May 2008.         [ Links ]

JOHNSON, W.B. 2007. On being a mentor: a guide for higher education faculty. Mahwah: Erlbaum.         [ Links ]

KARTJE, J.V. 1996. O mentor! My mentor! Peabody journal of education, 71(1):114-125.         [ Links ]

LAVE, J. & WENGER, E. 1991. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.         [ Links ]

MARSH, P., SWANEPOEL, I. & KAKAZA, W. 2009. Mentoring for success: a global best practice program. Presented at a mentors masterclass workshop for senior academics at Lombardy Estate, Pretoria, 25-26 February.         [ Links ]

MUELLER, S. 2004. Electronic mentoring as an example for the use of information and communications technology in engineering education. European journal of engineering education, 29(1 ):53.         [ Links ]

PERNA, F.M., LERNER, B.M. & YURA, M.T. 1995. Mentoring and career development among university faculty. Journal of education, 177(2):31-45.         [ Links ]

PISIMISI, S.S. & LOANNIDES, M.G. 2005. Developing mentoring relationship to support the careers of women in electrical engineering and computer technologies: an analysis of mentors' competencies. European journal of engineering education, 30(4):477.         [ Links ]

POGGENPOEL, M. 1998. Data analysis in qualitative research. (In De Vos, A.S., ed. Research at grass roots: a primer for the caring professions. Pretoria: Van Schaik. p. 334-356.         [ Links ])

QUINLAN, K.M. 1999. Enhancing mentoring and networking of junior academic women: what, why, and how? Journal of higher education policy and management, 21(1):31-42.         [ Links ]

SIMON, C.J., ed. 2003. Mentoring for mission: nurturing new faculty at church- related colleges. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.         [ Links ]

STANLEY, C.A. 2006. Coloring the academic landscape: faculty of color breaking the silence in predominantly white colleges and universities. American educational research journal, 43(4):701-736.         [ Links ]

STEINMANN, N. 2006. Fundamentals for effective mentoring: raising giant killers. Randburg: Knowres.         [ Links ]

UGRIN, J.C., ODOM, M.D. & PEARSON, J.M. 2008. Exploring the importance of mentoring for new scholars: a social exchange perspective. Journal of information systems education, 19(3):343-350.         [ Links ]

VAN LOUW, T. & WAGHID, Y. 2008. A deliberative democratic view of mentorship. South African journal of higher education, 22(1):207-221.         [ Links ]

WENGER, E. 1998. Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.         [ Links ]

WENGER, E. 2000. Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2):225-246.         [ Links ]

WILSON, P.P., PEREIRA, A. & VALENTINE, D. 2002. Perceptions of new social work faculty about mentoring experiences. Journal of social work education, 38(2):317-332.         [ Links ]

YOUNG, R.W. & CATES, C.M. 2005. Playful communication in mentoring. College student journal, 39(4):692-791.         [ Links ]

ZELLERS, D.F., HOWARD, V.M. & BARCIC, M.A. 2008. Faculty mentoring program: re-envisioning rather than re-inventing the wheel. Review of educational research, 78(3):552-588.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons