Die potensiële waarde van gesinsrituele vir betekenisgewing deur kinders

 

The potential value of family rituals in children's processes of meaning making

 

 

R. Ferreira, C.S. du Preez; E. Archer

Departement Opvoedkundige Sielkunde, Universiteit van Pretoria, Pretoria. E-pos: ronel.ferreira@up.ac.za carl@ksm.co.za emmiearcher@lantic.net

 

 

---

OPSOMMING

Hierdie artikel doen verslag oordie bevindings van 'n kwalitatiewe studie waartydens gesinsrituele as moontlike bate tydens betekenisgewing deur kinders verken is. Die doel van die studie was eerstens om die dimensies van geselekteerde gesinsrituele te identifiseer. Tweedens is moontlike wyses ondersoek waarop die beoefening van gesinsrituele kinders se betekenisgewing kan beïnvloed asook watter bategebaseerde uitkomste die beoefening van gesinsrituele moontlik kan oplewer. Die navorsing is vanuit die interpretivistiese paradigma onderneem, het op 'n instrumentele gevallestudie as navorsingsontwerp gesteun en opvoedkundig-sielkundige assesserings, informele gesprekvoering, semi-gestruktureerde onderhoude, reflektiewe joernale, visuele data, observasie en veldnotas as data-insamelings- en -vasleggingstegnieke benut. Twee Afrikaanssprekende laerskoolkinders ('n broer en suster) en hulle ouers is doelgerig as deelnemers geselekteer. Gedurende die studie kon die vyf basiese dimensies van gesinsrituele (struktuur, betekenis, volharding en toewyding, aanpasbaarheid en geslagsverhoudings) geïdentifiseerword in die rituele wat die deelnemende gesin beoefen het. Hierbenewens het ses ander dimensies prominent na vore getree, naamlik taakvoltooiing, kommunikasie, rolle, affektiewe bestuur, affektiewe betrokkenheid en gedragsbeheer. Op grond van die positiewe uitkoms van gesinsrituele op die betekenisgewing deur die deelnemende kinders aan hulself en ook die rituele waaraan hulle deelneem, word die gevolgtrekking gemaak dat gesinsrituele as moontlike bate aangewend kan word binne die konteks van die gesin. Dit volg verder dat gesinsrituele moontlik geïmplementeer kan word tydens gesinsintervensie-inisiatiewe.

Kernbegrippe: bategebaseerde benadering; betekenisgewing; gesinsritueel

---

ABSTRACT

This article reports on the findings of a qualitative study that explored family rituals as potential asset in children's processes of giving meaning. As such, the purpose of the study was firstly to identify the dimensions of family rituals in one family that participated; and secondly, to explore potential ways in which the participation in family rituals could influence children's processes of meaning making. The study was embedded in the interpretivist paradigm, rested on an instrumental case study design, and deployed educational psychological assessment, informal conversations, semi-structured interviews, reflective journals, visual data, observation and field notes as data collection and documentation methods. Two Afrikaans-speaking primary school children (a brother and sister) and their parents were purposefully selected as participants. During the study, the five basic dimensions of family rituals (structure, meaning, persistence and commitment, adaptability and gender relations) could be identified in the rituals practised by the participating family. In addition, six other dimensions were prominent, namely task completion, communication, roles, affective management, affective involvement and behaviour management. Based on the positive effect of family rituals on the meanings given by the participating children it is concluded that family rituals may serve as an asset within the family context and as such be employed during family intervention initiatives.

Key concepts: asset-based approach; giving of meaning; family ritual

---

 

 

Full text available only in PDF format.

 

 

Geraadpleegde bronne

AINSWORTH, M.D.S., BLEHAR, M.C., WALTER, E. & WALL, S. 1978. Patterns of attachment. Hillside: Erlbaum.         [ Links ]

BAXTER, L.A. & CLARK, C.L. 1996. Perceptions of family communication patterns and the enactment of family rituals. Western journal of communication, 60(3):254-269.         [ Links ]

BENNETT, L.A., WOLIN, S.J. & McAVITY, K.J. 1988. Family identity, ritual and myth: a cultural perspective on life cycle transition. (In Falicov, C.J., ed. Family transitions. New York: Guilford. p. 178-189.         [ Links ])

BROCK, B.J. 2000. TV free families: are they Lola Granolas, normal Joes or high and holy snots? http://www.tvturnoff.org/brocksumm.htm Date of access: 13 Sept. 2005.         [ Links ]

CALVERT, S.L., JORDAN, A.B. & COCKING, R.R. 2002. Children in the digital age: influences of electronic media on development. Westport: Praeger.         [ Links ]

COHEN, L., MANION, L. & MORRISON, K. 2000. Research methods in education. London: Routledge.         [ Links ]

COMPTON, W.C. 2005. An introduction to positive psychology. Belmont: Wadsworth.         [ Links ]

CRESWELL, J.W. 2005. Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. California: Sage.         [ Links ]

DENGEL, J. 2000. Family rituals and traditions - now more important than ever. http://preschoolerstoday.com/resources/articles/traditions.htm Date of access: 13 Sept. 2005.         [ Links ]

DENZIN, N.K. & LINCOLN, Y.S. 2003. The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. California: Sage.         [ Links ]

DICKSTEIN, S. 2002. Family routines and rituals - the importance of family functioning: comment on the special section. Journal of family psychology, 16(4):441-444.         [ Links ]

DUBAS, J.S. & GERRIS, J.R.M. 2002. Longitudinal changes in the time parents spend in activities with their adolescent children as a function of child age, pubertal status, and gender. Journal of family psychology, 16:415-427.         [ Links ]

EBERSOHN, L. & ELOFF, I. 2006. Linking life skills and the asset-based approach conceptually and contextually. (In Ebersöhn, L. & Eloff, I., ed. Life skills and assets. Pretoria: Van Schaik. p. 3-10.         [ Links ])

FIESE, B.H. & KLINE, C.A. 1993. Development of the family ritual questionnaire: initial reliability and validation studies. Journal of family psychology, 6:290-299.         [ Links ]

FIESE, B.H. & MARJINSKY, K.A.T. 1999. Dinnertime stories: connecting family practice with relationship beliefs and child adjustment. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 64(2):52-69.         [ Links ]

FIESE, B.H., TOMCHO, T.J., DOUGLAS, M., JOSEPHS, K., POLTROCK, S. & BAKER, T. 2002. A review of 50 years of research on naturally occurring family routines and rituals: cause for celebration. Journal of family psychology, 16(4):381-390.         [ Links ]

HOWE, G.W. 2002. Integrating family routines and rituals with other family research paradigms: comment on the special section. Journal of family psychology, 16(4):437-440.         [ Links ]

IMBER-BLACK, E. 2002. Family rituals - from research to the consulting room and back again: comment on the special section. Journal of family psychology, 16(4):445-446.         [ Links ]

KRETZMANN, J.P. & McKNIGHT, J.L. 1993. Building communities from the inside out: a path toward finding and mobilizing a community's assets. Chicago: ACTA.         [ Links ]

LARSON, R., RICHARDS, M.H., SIMS, B. & DWORKIN, J. 2001. How urban African American young adolescents spend their time: time budgets for locations, activities, and companionship. American journal of community psychology, 29:565-597.         [ Links ]

LOUW, D.A., VAN EDE, D.M. & LOUW, A.E. 1998. Menslike ontwikkeling. Pretoria: Kagiso.         [ Links ]

MACKEY, J. & GREIF, G. 1994. Using rituals to help parents in the school setting: lessons from family therapy. Social work in education, 16(3):171-178.         [ Links ]

McMILLAN, J.H. & SCHUMACHER, S. 2001. Research in education: a conceptual introduction. Virginia: Longman.         [ Links ]

MILLER, W.L. & CRABTREE, B.F. 2000. Clinical research. (In Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.W., ed. Handbook of qualitative research. California: Sage. p. 607-631.         [ Links ])

NICHOLS, M. & SCHWARTZ, R. 2000. Family therapy: concepts and methods. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.         [ Links ]

OSWALD, R.F. 2002. Inclusion and belonging in the family rituals of gay and lesbian people. Journal of family psychology, 16:428-436.         [ Links ]

PASUPATHI, M. 2001. The social construction of the personal past and its implications for adult development. Psychological bulletin, 127:651-672.         [ Links ]

PATTON, M.Q. 2002. Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: a personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative social work, 1(3):261-283.         [ Links ]

POPENOE, D., CUNNINGHAM, P. & BOULT, B. 1998. Sociology. 1st South African ed. Johannesburg: Pearson Education.         [ Links ]

ROBERTS, J. 1988. Setting the frame: definition, functions, and typology of rituals. (In Imber-Black, E., Roberts, J. & Whiting, R., ed. Rituals in families and family therapy. New York: Norton. p. 72-93.         [ Links ])

SCHUCK, L.A. & BUCY, J.E. 1997. Family rituals: implications for early intervention. Topics in early childhood special education, 17(4):447-494.         [ Links ]

SCHWANDT, T.A. 2000. Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. (In Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S., ed. Handbook of qualitative research. California: Sage. p. 189-214.         [ Links ])

SELIGMAN, M.E.P. 2002. Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy. (In Snyder, C.R. & Lopez, S.J., ed. Handbook of positive psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 3-13.         [ Links ])

ST. CLAIR, M. 2004. Object relations and self psychology: an introduction. Belmont: Thompson/Brooks/Cole.         [ Links ]

STAKE, R.E. 2000. Case studies. (In Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S., ed. Handbook of qualitative research. California: Sage. p. 435-454.         [ Links ])

TERRE BLANCHE, M. & DURRHEIM, K. 2002. Research in practice: applied methods for the social sciences. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.         [ Links ]

WENAR, C. & KERIG, P. 2005. Developmental psychopathology: from infancy through adolescence. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.         [ Links ]