SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.73 número1Combat organ trafficking - reward the donor or regulate sales"Caring schools" - a solution for addressing challenging behaviour in schools? índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Koers

versión On-line ISSN 2304-8557
versión impresa ISSN 0023-270X

Koers (Online) vol.73 no.1 Pretoria  2008

 

RESEARCH ARTICLE

 

A kenotic response to secularity

 

'n Kenotiese reaksie op sekulariteit

 

 

D.T. Williams

Department of Historical and Contextual Theology, University of Fort Hare, Alice. E-mail: dwilliams@ufh.ac.za

 

 


ABSTRACT

The church must be concerned to make the correct response to its increasing impotence and marginalisation in Western society due to secularisation. Past reaction has been to accommodate to the changed worldview, even to identify with it. A more appropriate response is to be Christocentric, so as to reflect the action of God himself in the sending of Christ for salvation. This involved his kenosis . In this case the response of the church is its own kenosis. This is also appropriate as secularisation was possible through the kenosis of God. The kenosis of the church is not an acceptance of defeat, but on the contrary, just as the kenosis of Christ, it aims at a positive result, the transformation of society.

Key concepts: Christocentric; culture; kenosis: self-limiting; secularisation


OPSOMMING

Die kerk moet sorg dra om op 'n verantwoordelike wyse te reageer teenoor haar toenemende onvermoë sowel as haar marginalisering in die Westerse samelewing as gevolg van sekularisering. Histories gesproke was haar strategie dié van akkommodasie en selfs identifikasie. 'n Meer gepaste respons sou wees om Christosentries te reageer - om die handeling van God self in sy missie van Christus, naamlik verlossing, te reflek-teer. Dit het sy kenosis (Selfontlediging) tot gevolg gehad. In hierdie geval is die respons van die kerk haar eie selfontlediging. Dit is moontlik, want sekularisasie was moontlik as gevolg van die Selfontlediging van God. Die selfontlediging van die kerk is nie om die aftog te blaas nie. Inteendeel, soos die Selfontlediging van Christus, het dit 'n positiewe resultaat ten doel, naamlik die transformasie van die samelewing.

Kernbegrippe: Christosentries; kenosis: selfbeperking; kultuur; sekularisasie


 

 

Full text available only in PDF format.

 

 

List of references

BERGER, P.L. 1969. The sacred canopy: elements of a sociological theory of religion. New York: Doubleday.         [ Links ]

BERGER, P.L. 1970. A rumour of angels: modern society and the rediscovery of the supernatural. London: Penguin.         [ Links ]

BLAMIRES, H. 1978. The Christian mind: how should a Christian think? Ann Arbor: Servant.         [ Links ]

BLUMENBERG, H. 1983. The legitimacy of the modern age. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.         [ Links ]

DEKKER, G. 1997. Modernity and the reformed churches in The Netherlands: bargaining or surrender? (In Dekker, G., Luidens, D.A. & Rice, R. Rethinking secularization: reformed reactions to modernity. Lanham: America University Press. p. 13-23.         [ Links ])

DEKKER, G., LUIDENS, D.A. & RICE, R. 1997. Conclusions: a resounding gong or a tinkling bell? (In Dekker, G., Luidens, D.A. & Rice, R. Rethinking secularization: reformed reactions to modernity. Lanham: America University Press. p. 279-284.         [ Links ])

DOBBELAERE, K. 2002. Secularisation: an analysis at three levels. Brussels: Lang.         [ Links ]

KÖNIG, A. 1988. New and greater things: re-evaluating the Biblical message on creation. Pretoria: University of South Africa.         [ Links ]

LYON, D. 1985. The steeple's shadow: on the myths and realities of secularisation. London: SPCK.         [ Links ]

MASCALL, E.L. 1965. The secularisation of Christianity: an analysis and a critique. London: Darton.         [ Links ]

NIEBUHR, H.R. 1952. Christ and culture. London: Faber & Faber.         [ Links ]

NORRIS, P. & INGLEHART, R. 2004. Sacred and secular: religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.         [ Links ]

RICHARD, R.L. 1967. Secularisation theology. New York: Herder & Herder.         [ Links ]

SCHUMACHER, E.F. 1973. Small is beautiful: a study of economics as if people mattered. London: Sphere.         [ Links ]

VEEREN, M.P. 1997. Three orientations within the reformed protestant churches of The Netherlands. (In Dekker, G., Luidens, D.A. & Rice, R. Rethinking secularization: reformed reactions to modernity. Lanham: America University Press. p. 165-176.         [ Links ])

WEBBER, R.E. 1981. The secular saint: the role of the Christian in the secular world. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.         [ Links ]

WILLIAMS, D.T. 1989. The Sabbath: mark of distinction. Themelios, 14(3):96-101.         [ Links ]

WILLIAMS, D.T. 2007. Secularisation from kenosis. Koers, 72(1):101-18.         [ Links ]

YODER, M.L. 1997. Transforming society vs. purifying the church: Iowa Reformed, Amish, and Mennonites as a case study. (In Dekker, G., Luidens, D.A. & Rice, R. Rethinking secularization: reformed reactions to modernity. Lanham: America University Press. p. 201-217.         [ Links ])

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons