SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.111 issue5 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy

On-line version ISSN 2411-9717
Print version ISSN 2225-6253

J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. vol.111 n.5 Johannesburg May. 2011

 

TRANSACTION PAPER

 

Revegetation of sand mines in the Seringveld Conservancy

 

 

A. van den Berg; J.M. Meeuwis; H.J. Annegarn

Department of Geography, Environmental Management and Energy Studies, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, South Africa

 

 


SYNOPSIS

Mining of sand in South Africa is rapidly growing to sustain an increasing demand for sand for building purposes. Although mining of sand is regulated by environmental legislation, such as the National Environmental Management Act 107 of 19981, previous bad mining practices have left areas of land degraded and vulnerable to erosion. This study was conducted in the Seringveld Conservancy, where mining of sand has left the landscape with a degraded and unsightly appearance, and where little rehabilitation of the original vegetation has taken place.
The aim of the study was to develop rehabilitation techniques for the degraded mined soils on two sand mines, Boekenhout Sand and Krokodil Sand, and to develop an overall strategy of revegetation by regenerating key plant species. Techniques for regenerating indigenous tree species cover, using modified mined sludge if topsoil is not available, were used to develop a practical and cost-effective strategy to be used in revegetation. A comparative trial was used to cultivate indigenous tree species in different soil mixtures.
The study is important as it provides new information on the rehabilitation and revegetation of sand mined areas in the Seringveld Conservancy. This study will determine if alternatives could be used to replace topsoil on mined areas where none is available. The study is needed to determine whether revegetation of the mined areas would be possible using indigenous plant species that are difficult to grow.
The overall results indicate that replacing topsoil was successful for various modified soil mixtures that could sustain the growth of indigenous vegetation on the sand mines. Different indigenous tree species require different modified soil mixtures for successful propagation. A revegetation strategy was developed to complement and enable the rehabilitation of the mined areas in the Seringveld Conservancy.

Keywords: Rehabilitation, revegetation, Seringveld, sand mines, Burkea africana, topsoil, germination trials


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

References

1. SOUTH AFRICA. National Environmental Management Act 107, Section 28, Duty of Care and Remediation of Environmental Damage. Available from www.info.gov.za/gazette/acts/1998/a107-98.pdf (Accessed on 15/04/2008). 1998.         [ Links ]

2. KUNDU, N.K. and GHOSE, M.K. Soil profile characteristics in Rajmahal Coalfield area. Indian Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, vol. 25, no. 1, 1997, pp. 28-32.         [ Links ]

3. SKLENICKA, P., PRIKRYL, L., SVOBODA, I., and LHOTA, T. Non-productive principles of landscape rehabilitation after long-term opencast mining in north-west Bohemia. Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 104, 2004, pp. 83-8.         [ Links ]

4. KUNDU, N.K. and GHOSE, M.K. (1998). Status of soil quality in the subsided areas caused by underground coal mining. Indian Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 110-13.         [ Links ]

5. VAN AARDE, R.J., SMITH, A.M., and CLAASSENS, A.S. Soil characteristics of rehabilitating mined and un-mined coastal dunes at Richards Bay, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Restoration Ecology, vol. 6, 1998, pp. 102-10.         [ Links ]

6. GHOSE, M.K. (2005). Soil conservation for rehabilitation and revegetation of mine-degraded land. TERI Information Digest on Energy and Environment, vol. 4, no. 2, 2005, pp. 137-50.         [ Links ]

7. SOUTH AFRICA. Mineral and Petroleum Resource Development Act of 2002. Government Gazette, 448. Pretoria: Government Printers. 2002.         [ Links ]

8. COPPIN, N.J. and BOX, J. Sustainable rehabilitation and revegetation: The identification of after-use options for mines and quarries using a land suitability classification involving nature conservation. A. Warhurst & L. Moronha (eds.). Environmental Policy in Mining: Corporate Strategy and Planning for Closure. New York: Lewis Publishers, 2000. pp. 229-40.         [ Links ]

9. VAN DEVENTER, P.W., BLOEM, A.A., and HATTINGH, J. M. Soil quality as a key success factor in sustainable rehabilitation of kimberlite mine waste. Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 108, 2008, pp. 131-7.         [ Links ]

10. HUTNIK, R.J.A. and MCKEE, G.W. Revegetation. B.A. Kennedy (ed.). Surface Mining (2nd Edition). Denver: Colorado Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration, 1990, pp. 811-8.         [ Links ]

11. BENNETT, A.F., KIMBER, S.L., and RYAN, P.A. Revegetation and Wildlife - A guide to enhancing revegetated habitats for wildlife conservation in rural environments. Bushcare National and Research Development Program Research Report 2/00. Melbourne: School of Ecology and Environment, Deakin University. 2000.         [ Links ]

12. CLAASSEN, V.P. and ZASOSKI, R.J. Enhancements of revegetation on construction fill by fertilizer and topsoil application: Effect on mycorrhizal infection. Land Degradation and Rehabilitation, vol. 4, 1993, pp. 45-55.         [ Links ]

13. GOODWIN, K. and SHELEY, R. Revegetation Guidelines for Western Montana: Considering Invasive Weeds. Land Resources and Environmental Science. Bozeman MT: Montana State University. 2003.         [ Links ]

14. DJAWENA. Boekenhout Sand Environmental Management Programme (EMP). Report No. MR 82 Boekenhout Sand. Pretoria: Djawena Environmental Consultancy. 2006.         [ Links ]

15. DJAWENA. Krokodil Sand Environmental Management Programme (EMP). Report No. ML 10-2004 Krokodil Sand. Pretoria: Djawena Environmental Consultancy. 2007.         [ Links ]

16. MUCINA, L. and RUTHERFORD, M.C. The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity Institute. 2006.         [ Links ]

17. CRAFFORD, J.E. Ecological assessment of portions of the farms Kameelfontein 297JR and Krokodilspruit 290JR. Report ML_10-2004 Krokodil Sand. Pretoria: Djawena Environmental Consultancy. 2005.         [ Links ]

18. BRAY, R.H. and KURTZ, L.T. Determination of total, organic and available form of phosphorus in soil. Soil Science, vol. 58, 1945, pp. 39-45.         [ Links ]

19. RANDEL, L. and WILREKER, G. Vegetation to use in rehabilitation. In: Rehabilitation Guideline for the Mining in Metsweding Project. Report No. GDACE_Rpt2-06 Version 3. Pretoria: Government Printer. 2007.         [ Links ]

20. LYLE, E.S. Surface Mine Reclamation Manual. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1987, p. 63.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License