SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.108 issue12 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy

On-line version ISSN 2411-9717
Print version ISSN 2225-6253

J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. vol.108 n.12 Johannesburg Dec. 2008

 

TRANSACTION PAPER

 

Mining method selection by AHP approach

 

 

M. Ataei; M. Jamshidi; F. Sereshki; S.M.E. Jalali

Shahrood University of Technology

 

 


SYNOPSIS

One of the most critical and complicated steps in mine design is a suitable mining method selection based upon geological, geotechnical, geographical and economical parameters. Since there are many factors involved in mining method selection, the decisionmaking process is very difficult. In this paper, the Analytical Hierarchy Process, with 13 criteria, is used to develop a suitable mining method for the Golbini No. 8 deposit in Jajarm (Iran). Six alternatives (conventional cut and fill, mechanized cut and fill, shrinkage stoping, sublevel stoping, bench mining, and stull stoping) are evaluated. The studies show that the suitable mining method for this deposit in the present situation is the conventional cut and fill method.


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

References

ALPAY, S and YAVUZ, M. A decision support system for underground mining method selection. IEA/AIE, LNAI 4570/ 2007; pp. 334-343.         [ Links ]

ATAEI, M. Multicriteria selection for alumina-cement plant location in East-Azerbaijan province of Iran. The Journal of The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 2005, vol. 105, no. 7. pp. 507 -514.         [ Links ]

BASCETIN, A. A decision support system for optimal equipment selection in open pit mining: analytical hierarchy process. Geology Department, Faculty of Engineering, Istanbul University 2003, vol. 16, no. 2. pp. 1-11.         [ Links ]

BASCETIN, A. An application of the analytic hierarchy process in equipment selection at Orhaneli open pit coal mine, Mining Technology. Transaction Institution of Mining and Metallurgy 2004, pp. A192-A199.         [ Links ]

BASCETIN, A. Decision support system using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for the optimal environmental reclamation of an open-pit mine. Environmental Geology 2007, vol. 52, no. 4. pp. 663-672.         [ Links ]

BITARAFAN, M. and ATAEI, M. Mining method selection by multiple criteria decision making tools. The Journal of The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 2004, vol. 104, no. 9. pp. 493-498.         [ Links ]

CHEN, C. and LIU Y. A methodology for evaluation and classification of rock mass quality on tunnel engineering 2007, vol. 22 no. 4. pp. 377-387.         [ Links ]

CHING, L. and CHAO, C. A new approach for application of rock mass classification on rock slope stability assessment, Journal of Engineering Geology 2007, vol. 89, pp. 129-143.         [ Links ]

EDDI, W. and HANG, L. Analytic hierarchy process, an approach to determine measures for business performance. Measuring Business Performance 2001, vol. 5, no. 3. pp. 30-36.         [ Links ]

ELKARMI, F. and MUSTAFA, I. Increasing the utilization of solar energy technologies (SET) in Jordan. Energy Policy 1993, vol. 21. pp. 978-984.         [ Links ]

HERTWICH, E., PEASE, W. and KOSHLAND, C. Evaluating the environmental impact of products and production processes: A comparison of six methods. The Science of the Total Environment 1997, vol. 196. pp. 13-29.         [ Links ]

KUMAR, P. and RAMCHARAN, K. Analytic hierarchy process helps select site for limestone quarry expansion in Barbados. Journal of Environmental Management. 2008 In Press, Corrected proof.         [ Links ]

MARINONI, O. Implementation of the analytical hierarchy process with VBA in ArcGIS. Computers & Geosciences 2004, vol. 30, no. 6. pp. 637-646.         [ Links ]

SAATY, T. The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York. 1980.         [ Links ]

SAATY, T. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operations Research. 1990, vol. 48. pp. 9-26.         [ Links ]

SADIQ, R., HUSAIN, T., VEITCH, B. and BOSE, N. Risk-based decision-making for drilling waste discharges using a fuzzy synthetic evaluation technique. Ocean Engineering 2004, vol. 31, no. 16. pp. 1929-1953.         [ Links ]

SAMANTA, B., SARKAR, B. and MUKHERJEE, S. Selection of opencast mining equipment by a multi-criteria decision-making process. Transaction Institution of Mining and Metallurgy 2002, vol. 111. pp. A136-A142.         [ Links ]

WEDLEY, W. Combining qualitative and quantitative factors-an analytic hierarchy approach. Socio Econ Plan Sci, 1990, vol. 24. pp. 114-22.         [ Links ]

YAVUZ, M. and IPHAR, M. Once G. The optimum support design selection by using AHP method for the main haulage road in WLC Tuncbilek colliery. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2008; In Press, Corrected proof.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License