SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.22 número2The role of relationship management in the successful outsourcing of maintenanceNew heuristics for minimising total completion time and the number of tardy jobs criteria on a single machine with release time índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


South African Journal of Industrial Engineering

versión On-line ISSN 2224-7890
versión impresa ISSN 1012-277X

S. Afr. J. Ind. Eng. vol.22 no.2 Pretoria  2011

 

Cross-cultural communication behaviour in international engineering projects: Chinese and South African perspectives

 

 

D. JiangI; L. PretoriusII

IGraduate School of Technology Management, University of Pretoria, South Africa, dongdong751212@gmail.com
IIGraduate School of Technology Management, University of Pretoria, South Africa, leon.pretorius@up.ac.za

 

 


ABSTRACT

Past researchers and practitioners have realised that merely developing scheduling techniques is not enough to ensure successful engineering projects, and that communication behaviour is also a critical cultural issue for achieving project success. In this article, the communication behaviour of Chinese project managers is assessed in a cultural context, and the effect of communication behaviour on five project activities (project communication, negotiation, conflict solving, contract process, and team building) is evaluated. This is an empirical study that makes use of surveys to explore the cultural differences between Chinese and South African engineering project managers in respect of their communication behaviour, and the effects of those differences on the five project management activities in the construction industry. There are significant differences between Chinese and South African project managers in their communication behaviour in three project activities. However, there seems to be no significant difference between their communication behaviours in the contract process.


OPSOMMING

Navorsers en praktiserende projekbestuurders het reeds tot die gevolgtrekking gekom dat skeduleringstegnieke op hulle eie nie voldoende is om suksesvolle projekte te verseker nie. Kommunikasiegedrag is ook 'n kritieke kulturele faktor wat kan bydra tot suksesvolle projekte. In hierdie artikel word die kommunikasiegedrag van Chinese projekbestuurders in 'n kulturele konteks geassesseer en die uitwerking van die kommunikasiegedrag op vyf projekbestuursaktiwiteite (projekkommunikasie, onder-handeling, konflikhantering, kontrakproses en spanbou) word geëvalueer. Hierdie is 'n empiriese studie waar steekproewe gebruik word om kulturele verskille betreffende kommunikasiegedrag tussen Chinese en Suid-Afrikaanse projekbestuurders, en die uitwerking daarvan op die vyf projebestuursaktiwiteite in die konstruksiebedryf te ondersoek. Beduidende verskille tussen Chinese en Suid-Afrikaanse projekbestuurders se kommunikasiegedrag tydens drie projekatiwiteite word aangetoon. Tydens die kontrak-teringsproses skyn daar egter geen beduidende verskil in kommunikasiegedrag te wees nie.


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

REFERENCES

[1] [Chevrier, S. 2003. Cross-cultural management in multinational project groups, Journal of World Business, 38, pp141-149        [ Links ]

[2] Horrii,T., Jin, Y. & Levitt, R. 2004. Modeling and analyzing cultural influences on project team performance, Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 10, pp 305-321        [ Links ]

[3] Muriithi, N. & Crawford, L. 2003. Approaches to project management in Africa: Implications for international development projects, International Journal of Project Management, 21(5), pp309-319        [ Links ]

[4] Hofstede, G. 1993. Cultural constraints on management theories, Academy of Management Executive, 7(1), pp 81-93        [ Links ]

[5] Pheng, L.S. & Leong, C.Y. 2000. Cross-cultural project management for international construction in China, International Journal of Project Management, 18(5), pp 307-316        [ Links ]

[6] Chen, P. & Partington, D. 2004. An interpretive comparison of Chinese and Western conceptions of relationships in construction project management work, International Journal of Project Management, 22(5), pp 397-406        [ Links ]

[7] Ochieng, E.G. & Price, A.D.F. 2010. Managing cross-cultural communication in multicultural construction project teams: The case of Kenya and UK, International Journal of Project Management, 28(5), pp 449-460        [ Links ]

[8] Howes, R. & Tah, H.M. 2003. Strategic management applied to international construction, London: Thomas Telford Publishing.         [ Links ]

[9] Gray, C.F. & Larson, E.W. 2003. Project management: The managerial process, second edition, London: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.         [ Links ]

[10] Dadfar, H. & Gustavsson, P. 1992. Competition by effective management of cultural diversity, International Studies of Management or Organization, 22(4).         [ Links ]

[11] Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture's consequences: International differences and related values, Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications.         [ Links ]

[12] Hofstede, G. 1991. Cultures and organization: Software of the mind, Maidenhead UK: McGraw-Hill.         [ Links ]

[13] Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's consequences: International differences and related values, second edition, Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications.         [ Links ]

[14] Norales, F.O. 2006. Cross-cultural communication: Concepts, cases and challenges. Youngstown, NY: Cambria Press.         [ Links ]

[15] Loosemore, M. & Muslmani, H.A.S. 1999. Construction project management in the Persian Gulf: Inter-cultural communication, International Journal of Project Management, 17(2), pp 95-100        [ Links ]

[16] Beamer, L. & Varner, I. 2008. Intercultural communication in the global workplace, international edition, McGraw-Hill Education (Asia), p 29        [ Links ]

[17] Beamer, L. & Varner, I. 2001. Intercultural communication in the global workplace, McGraw-Hill/Irwn, USA, p 22        [ Links ]

[18] Zeng, S.Q. 2003. Chinese-style management (Chinese version), China Social Sciences Press.         [ Links ]

[19] Zeng, S.Q. 2005. Chinese-style leadership - humanistic managerial art (Chinese version), Peking University Press.         [ Links ]

[20] Zeng, S.Q. 2007. Chinese-style team (Chinese version), Peking University Press.         [ Links ]

[21] Chen, G. & Ma, R. (eds). 2001. The impact of harmony on Chinese conflict management, Chinese conflict management and resolution, Greenwood Publishing Group, p 3        [ Links ]

[22] Ma, R. 1996. Saying 'yes' for 'no' and 'no' for 'yes': A Chinese rule, Journal of Pragmatics, 25, pp 257-266        [ Links ]

[23] Chan, W.K.L., Wong, F.K.W. & Scott, D. 1999. Managing construction projects in China - the transitional period in the millennium, International Journal of Project Management, 17(4), pp 257-263        [ Links ]

[24] Chan, E.H.W. 1997. Amicable dispute resolution in the People's Republic of China and its implications for foreign-related construction disputes, Construction Management and Economics, 15, pp 539-548        [ Links ]

[25] Cooper, D.R. & Schindler, P.S. (eds). 2006. Business research methods, ninth edition, McGraw-Hill.         [ Links ]

 

 

1 The author is enrolled for a PhD (Project Management) degree in the Graduate School of Technology Management, University of Pretoria.

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons