Collaboration in South African engineering research

 

 

R. Sooryamoorthy

Sociology Programme, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. sooryamoorthyr@ukzn.ac.za

 

 

---

ABSTRACT

The production of scientific publications in engineering in South Africa has expanded over the last three decades. Because engineering is an important science, this expansion has implications for the growth and development of the economy. Drawing on a sample range of years of the publications stored in the ISI Web of Knowledge, the engineering publications of South Africans for a 30-year period from 1975-2005 are analysed. This analysis shows that the production of scientific publications in engineering by South African researchers has increased during the analysed period; that the number of researchers per publication has grown; that the number of countries collaborating with South Africa has increased; and that the number of sole-authored papers has decreased. Domestic collaboration (between researchers within South Africa) has decreased, while international collaboration has grown considerably. The key objective of the paper is to find out whether the production of publications is related to the level of collaboration, and to see how collaboration can be regressed from other known variables. It is clear from the study that collaboration is a decisive factor in the production of scientific publications in engineering in South Africa.

---

OPSOMMING

Die produksie van wetenskaplike publikasies in ingenieurswese in Suid-Afrika het oor die afgelope drie dekades toegeneem. Aangesien ingenieurswese 'n belangrike wetenskap is, beïnvloed dié toename die groei en ontwikkeling van die ekonomie. Deur na 'n monster van voormalige publikasies op die "ISI Web of Science" te kyk, is die publikasies in ingenieurswese deur Suid-Afrikaners oor 'n 30 jaar periode van 1975-2005 geanaliseer. Die analise toon dat die produksie van wetenskaplike publikasies in ingenieurswese deur Suid-Afrikaanse navorsers toegeneem het oor dié tydperk; dat die aantal navorsers per publikasie gegroei het; dat daar 'n toename was in die hoeveelheid lande wat met Suid-Afrika saamgewerk het; en dat die aantal artikels van enkelouteurs verminder het. Plaaslike samewerking (tussen Suid-Afrikaanse navorsers) het afgeneem, maar internasionale samewerking het aansienlik toegeneem. Die hoofdoelwit van die artikel is om te bepaal of die produksie van publikasies verband hou met die vlak van samewerking, en om vas te stel hoe samewerking vanaf ander bekende veranderlikes terugbereken kan word. Uit die studie blyk dit duidelik dat samewerking 'n beslissende faktor is ten opsigte van die produksie van wetenskaplike publikasies in ingenieurswese in Suid-Afrika.

---

 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

REFERENCES

[1] Bengisu, M. 2003. Critical and emerging technologies in materials, manufacturing, and industrial engineering: A study of priority setting, Scientometrics, 58(3), pp. 473-487.         [ Links ]

[2] Lister, G. & Donaldson, K. 2003. New roles for industrial engineers in developing countries, South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 15(1), pp. 43-52.         [ Links ]

[3] Arvanitis, R., Waast, R. & Gaillard, J. 2000. Science in Africa: A bibliometric panorama using PASCAL database, Scientometrics, 47(3), pp. 457-473.         [ Links ]

[4] Tsay, M-Y. 2009. An analysis and comparison of scientometric data between journals of physics, chemistry and engineering, Scientometrics, 78(2), pp. 279-293.         [ Links ]

[5] Dastidar, P.G. & Ramachandran, S. 2005. Engineering research in ocean sector: An international profile, Scientometrics, 65(2), pp. 199-213.         [ Links ]

[6] Rao, I.K.R. & Suma, P. 1999. A quantitative study of Indian engineering literature, Scientometrics, 46(3), pp. 605-619.         [ Links ]

[7] Pouris, A. 2009. Quantitative assessment of South Africa's inventive outputs: International patent analysis, South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 20(1), pp 13-29.         [ Links ]

[8] Sooryamoorthy, R. 2010. The visibility of engineering research in South Africa, South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 21(2), pp. 1-12.         [ Links ]

[9] Sooryamoorthy, R. 2010. Scientific publications of engineers in South Africa, 1975-2005, Scientometrics, 86(1), pp. 211-226.         [ Links ]

[10] Boshoff, N. 2009. South-South research collaboration of countries in the Southern African Development Community (SADC), Scientometrics, 84(2), pp. 481-503.         [ Links ]

[11] Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C.A. & Costa, F.D. 2009. Research collaboration and productivity: Is there correlation? Higher Education, 57, pp. 155-171.         [ Links ]

[12] Mouton, J. 2000. Patterns of research collaboration in South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 96(9/10), pp. 458-462.         [ Links ]

[13] Sooryamoorthy, R. 2009. Collaboration and publication: How collaborative are scientists in South Africa?, Scientometrics, 80(2), pp. 419-439.         [ Links ]

[14] Boshoff, N. 2009. Neo-colonialism and research collaboration in Central Africa, Scientometrics, 81(2), pp. 413-434.         [ Links ]

[15] Sooryamoorthy, R. 2010. Medical research in South Africa: A scientometric analysis of trends, patterns, productivity and partnership, Scientometrics, 84(3), pp. 863-885.         [ Links ]

[16] Kundra, R. & Kretschmer, H. 1999. A new model of scientific collaboration: Part 2, Collaboration patterns in Indian medicine, Scientometrics, 46(3), pp. 519-528.         [ Links ]

[17] Chen, T-J., Chen, Y-C., Hwang, S-J. & Chou, L.F. 2007. International collaboration of clinical medicine research in Taiwan, 1990-2004: A bibliometric analysis, Journal of Chinese Medical Association, 70(3), pp. 110-116.         [ Links ]

[18] Navarro, A. & Martin, M.2004. Scientific production and international collaboration in occupational health, 1992-2001, Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 30(3), pp. 223-233.         [ Links ]

[19] Basu, A. & Aggarwal, R. 2001. International collaboration in science in India and its impact on institutional performance, Scientometrics, 52(3), pp. 379-394.         [ Links ]

[20] Glanzel, W., Schubert, A. & Czerwon, H.J. 1999. A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985-1995), Scientometrics, 45(2), pp. 185-202.         [ Links ]

[21] Wagner, C.S. 2005. Six case studies of international collaboration in science, Scientometrics, 62(1), pp 3-26.         [ Links ]

[22] SAJS. 2006. Engineering the future. South African Journal of Science, 102(11&12), p. 506.         [ Links ]

[23] Rooks, G., Oerlemans, L., Buys, A. & Pretorius, T. 2005. Industrial innovation in South Africa: A comparative study, South African Journal of Science,101(3&4), pp. 149-150.         [ Links ]

[24] Sooryamoorthy, R. 2009. Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications, Scientometrics, 81(1), pp. 171-193.         [ Links ]

[25] Schmoch, U. & Schubert, T. 2008. Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research?, Scientometrics, 74(3), pp. 361-377.         [ Links ]

[26] Ma, N. & Guan, J. 2005. An exploratory study on collaboration profiles of Chinese publications in molecular biology, Scientometrics, 65(1), pp. 343-355.         [ Links ]

[27] Gupta, B.M. & Karisiddippa, C.R. 1999. Collaboration and author productivity: A study with a new variable in Lotka's Law, Scientometrics, 44(1), pp. 129-134.         [ Links ]

[28] Moed, H.F. & Hesselink, F.T. 1996. The publication output and impact of academic chemistry research in the Netherlands during the 1980s: Bibliometric analyses and policy implications, Research Policy, 25(5), pp. 819-836.         [ Links ]