SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.22 número1Modelling of uncertainty in minimising the cost of inventory for disaster reliefAn investigation into the status of project management in South Africa índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


South African Journal of Industrial Engineering

versão On-line ISSN 1012-277X

S. Afr. J. Ind. Eng. vol.22 no.1 Pretoria  2011

 

Convergence of technologies

 

 

R. Siriram

School of Mechanical, Industrial and Aeronautical Engineering, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa. raj.siriram@mea.dimensiondata.com

 

 


ABSTRACT

Technology is a catalyst for competitive advantage. However, it is how technology is used that leads to a firm's improved performance. In this article, an investigative framework is constructed to understand better what strategically drives new technology adoption. The strategic drivers include technology and business strategy alignment, better technology planning and selection of new technologies, the effects on a firm's culture and climate, links to a firm's organisational and environmental evolution, and benefits through convergence and collaboration. Using an investigative framework, it is shown how the strategic drivers link to improve a firm's performance, producing competitive advantage. The investigative framework is tested using structural equation modelling. Various hypotheses are formed, and recommendations for further research are made.


OPSOMMING

Tegnologie is 'n katalisator vir mededingende voordeel. Dit is egter hoe tegnologie aangewend word wat aanleiding gee tot 'n onderneming se verbeterde prestasie. In hierdie artikel word 'n ondersoekende raamwerk gekonstrueer om insig te kry in dit wat die aanvaarding van nuwe tegnologie strategies dryf. Die strategiese dryfvere sluit in die belyning van tegnologie en ondernemingstrategie, beter tegnologiebeplanning en seleksie van nuwe tegnologieë, die effek op 'n onderneming se kultuur en klimaat, koppeling na 'n onderneming se organisatoriese en omgewingsevolusie, en voordele verkry deur konvergensie en samewerking. Deur 'n ondersoekende raamwerk te gebruik, word daar getoon dat die strategiese dryfvere koppel om 'n onderneming se prestasie te verbeter en sodoende 'n mededingende voordeel te skep. Die raamwerk word getoets en hipoteses geformuleer waarna aanbevelings oor verdere navorsing aan die hand gedoen word.


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

 

REFERENCES

[1] Armstrong, J.S. & Overton, T.S. 1997. Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), pp. 61-83.         [ Links ]

[2] Anderson, J.C. & Gerbing, D.W. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3), pp. 411-423.         [ Links ]

[3] Birchall, D.W., Chanaron, J.J. & Soderquist, K. 1996. Managing innovation in SMEs: A comparison of companies in the UK, France and Portugal, International Journal of Technology Management, 12(3), pp. 291-305.         [ Links ]

[4] Bharadwaj, A.S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: A resource-based study, MIS Quarterly, 24, 1, pp. 169-196.         [ Links ]

[5] Boyer, K.K., Ward, P.T. & Leong, G.K. 1996. Approaches to the factory of the future: An empirical taxonomy, Journal of Operations Management, 14, pp. 297-313.         [ Links ]

[6] Burgelman, R.A., Christensen, C.M. & Wheelwright, S.C. 2009. Integrating technology and strategy: A general management perspective, in Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation, 5th edition.         [ Links ]

[7] Carr, A.S. & Pearson, J.N. 1999. Strategically managed buyer-supplier relationships and performance outcomes, Journal of Operations Management, 17, pp. 497-519.         [ Links ]

[8] Cetindamar, D. & Phaal, R. 2009. Understanding technology management as a dynamic capability: A framework for technology management activities, Technovation, 29, pp. 237-246.         [ Links ]

[9] Chesbrough, H. 2003. Open-innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.         [ Links ]

[10] Cormican, K. & O'Sullivan, D. 2004. Auditing best practice for effective product innovation management, Technovation, 24, pp. 819-829.         [ Links ]

[11] Day, G.G., Schoemaker, P.J.H. & Gunther, R.E. 2000. Managing emerging technologies, Wiley.         [ Links ]

[12] Da Silveira, G. 2001. Innovation diffusion: Research agenda for developing economies, Technovation, 21, pp. 767-773.         [ Links ]

[13] Drejer, A. 1996. Frameworks for the management of technology: Towards a contingent approach, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 8 (1), pp. 9-20.         [ Links ]

[14] Fornell, C. & Larker, D.F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), pp. 39-50.         [ Links ]

[15] Freel, M. 2000. Barriers to product innovation in small manufacturing firms. International Small Business Journal, 18 (2), pp. 60-73.         [ Links ]

[16] Friedman, T.L. 2006. The world is flat, Penguin Books.         [ Links ]

[17] Gomes-Casseres, B. 1997. Alliances strategies of small firms, Small Business Economics, 9, pp. 33-44.         [ Links ]

[18] Gupta, M., Czernik, A. & Sharma, R.D. 2001. Operations strategies of banks using new technologies for competitive advantage, Technovation, 21, pp. 775-782.         [ Links ]

[19] Hair, J.F. Jr., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. & Black, W.C. 1998. Multivariate data analysis, Prentice Hall, 5th edition.         [ Links ]

[20] Hamel., G. 2000. Leading the revolution, Harvard Business School Press.         [ Links ]

[21] Hanna-Kisa, E., Wikstrom, P. & Jantunen, A. Linking dynamic-capability portfolios and innovation outcomes, Technovation, 29, pp. 753-762.         [ Links ]

[22] Henderson, J.C. & Venkatraman, N. 1993. Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organisations. IBM Systems Journal, 32, 1, 4-16.         [ Links ]

[23] Janszen, F. 2000. The age of innovation, Prentice Hall.         [ Links ]

[24] Ismail, H.S., Snowden, S.P., Poolton, J., Reid, I.R. & Arokiam, I.C. 2006. Agile manufacturing framework and practice, International Journal of Agile Systems and Management 1 (1), pp. 11-28.         [ Links ]

[25] Kaufmann, A. & Todtling, F. 2002. How effective is innovation support for SMEs? An analysis of the region of upper Austria. Technovation 22, pp. 147-159.         [ Links ]

[26] Kohler, T., Matzler, K. & Fuller, J. 2009. Avatar-based innovation: Using virtual worlds for real-world innovation, Technovation, 29, pp. 395-407.         [ Links ]

[27] Kettunen, P. 2008. Adopting key lessons from agile manufacturing to agile software product development - A comparative study, Technovation, 29, pp.408-422.         [ Links ]

[28] Lin, I. 2004. Innovation in the networked world: New corporate mindsets for the cyber age, in Barker, C. & Coy, R., Innovation and imagination at work, 2nd edition, McGraw Hill Australia.         [ Links ]

[29] Linton, J. 2009. De-babelizing the language of innovation, Technovation, 29, pp. 729-737.         [ Links ]

[30] Luftmann, J.N., Lewis, P.R. & Oldach, S.H. 1993. Transforming the enterprise: The alignment of business and information technology strategies, IBM Systems Journal, 32, 1, 198-221.         [ Links ]

[31] Mazzarol, T. & Rebound, S. 2008. The role of complementary actors in the development of innovation in small firms, International Journal of Innovation Management, 12 (2), pp. 223-253.         [ Links ]

[32] Mitarai, F. 2004. The Canon way of growth innovation is the name of the game, in Business Week, European Edition, 75 Anniversary Issue, October 11, pp. 14-15.         [ Links ]

[33] Nelson, R.S. 1991. Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12, pp. 61-74.         [ Links ]

[34] Parthasarthy, R. & Sethi, S.P. 1992. The impact of flexible automation on business strategy and organizational structure. Academy of Management Review 17 (1), pp. 86-111.         [ Links ]

[35] Porter, M.E. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations, 2nd edition, MacMillan.         [ Links ]

[36] Porter, M.E. 1991. Towards a dynamic theory of strategy, Strategic management Journal, 12, pp. 95-117.         [ Links ]

[37] Porter, M.E. 1996. What is a strategy? Harvard Business Review, November-December 1996, in Burgelam, R.A., Christensen, C.M., Wheelwright, S.C., Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation, McGraw-Hill.         [ Links ]

[38] Radas, S. & Bozic, L. 2009. The antecedents of SME innovativeness in an emerging transition economy, Technovation, 29, pp. 438-450.         [ Links ]

[39] Ross, J.W. & Beath, C.M. 2002. Beyond the business case: New approaches to IT investment, MIT Sloan Management Review, Winter, pp. 51-59.         [ Links ]

[40] Salhieh, Sa'Ed. M. 2007. A systematic approach for selection of business processes for E-enablement. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 6 (4), pp. 649-669.         [ Links ]

[41] Sams, S. 2005. Emerging expertise, Harvard Business Review, May, reprint F0505F, pp. 1-3.         [ Links ]

[42] Shapiro, S.M. 2002. 24/7 Innovation, McGraw Hill.         [ Links ]

[43] Siriram, R. & Snaddon, D.R. 2004. Verifying links in technology management, transaction processes and governance structures, Technovation, 25, pp. 321-337.         [ Links ]

[44] Stoneman, P. & Kwon, M.J. 1996. Technology adoption and firm profitability, The Economic Journal, 106, 952-962.         [ Links ]

[45] Teece, D.J. 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and micro-foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, pp. 1319-1350.         [ Links ]

[46] Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. & Sheun A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, 18, pp. 509-533.         [ Links ]

[47] Urstadt, B. 2006. A tangle of wires. Technology review, an MIT Enterprise, December 2005/January 2006, pp. 1-3.         [ Links ]

[48] Van de Vrande, V.J.A., De Jong, J.P.J. & Vanhaverbeke, W. 2009. Open Innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges, Technovation, 29, pp. 423-437.         [ Links ]

[49] Williams, L.J. & Hazer, J.T. 1986. Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A reanalysis using latent variable structural equation models, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), pp. 219-231.         [ Links ]

[50] Yang, C. & Su, Yi-fen. 2008. The impact of ERP implementation on corporate SCM performance: From an operational and information integration perspective, Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE IEEM Conference, pp. 1668-1672.         [ Links ]

[51] Zahra, S.A. & Covin, J.G. 1993. Business strategy, technology policy and firm performance, Strategic Management Journal, 14 (6), pp. 451-478.28        [ Links ]

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License