SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 número2Note from the EditorApplying mixed integer programming for green supply chain management índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


South African Journal of Industrial Engineering

versión On-line ISSN 2224-7890
versión impresa ISSN 1012-277X

S. Afr. J. Ind. Eng. vol.21 no.2 Pretoria  2010

 

FEATURE ARTICLE

 

The visibility of engineering research in South Africa, 1975-2005

 

 

R Sooryamoorthy

Sociology Programme, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa sooryamoorthyr@ukzn.ac.za

 

 


ABSTRACT

Engineering as a branch of science has a crucial role in the growth of the economy. The growth and development of engineering is therefore highly relevant. One way to understand this is to examine the characteristics of the scientific knowledge produced in the field of engineering. Drawing on the publications in engineering from the ISI Web of Science over the last three decades, this paper looks at the visibility and importance of engineering research in South Africa. The visibility of research publications is studied in terms of the number of citations a publication receives. The analysis shows that the visibility of South African engineering research is determined by the number of authors involved in the production of a paper, the presence of international collaboration, the degree of collaboration, and the journals in which the papers are published. Engineering research in South Africa, compared with that of all subjects, is clearly growing. But the visibility of South African engineering publications, in comparison with all other subjects, has been diminishing in recent years.


OPSOMMING

Ingenieurswese as 'n vertakking van die wetenskap speel 'n kardinale rol in die groei van die ekonomie. Die groei en ontwikkeling van die ingenieurswese is dus uiters relevant. Een manier om dit te verstaan, is om die eienskappe van die wetenskaplike kennis wat op die terrein van die ingenieurswese geproduseer word te ondersoek. Deur na die publikasies in ingenieurswese op die "ISI Web of Science" te kyk oor die afgelope drie dekades, bestudeer hierdie artikel die sigbaarheid en belangrikheid van navorsing in die ingenieurswese in Suid-Afrika. Die sigbaarheid van navorsingspublikasies word bestudeer aan die hand van die aantal sitasies wat 'n gepubliseerde artikel ontvang. Die ontleding toon dat die sigbaarheid van Suid-Afrikaanse ingenieurswese-navorsing bepaal word deur die aantal outeurs betrokke by die artikel, die teenwoordigheid van internasionale samewerking, die mate van samewerking asook die joernale waarin dit gepubliseer is. Navorsing in die ingenieurswese in Suid-Afrika is duidelik aan die groei in vergelyking met ander vakgebiede. Daarteenoor, neem die sigbaarheid egter af wanneer dit met ander vakgebiede vergelyk word.


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

REFERENCES

[1] Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C.A., & Costa, F.D. 2009. Research collaboration and productivity: Is there correlation? Highe* Education, 57, pp. 155-171.         [ Links ]

[2] Arunachalam, S., : Doss, J.J. 2000. Science in a small country at a time of globalization: Domestic and international collaboration in new biology research in Israel. Journal of Information Science, 26(1, pp. 39-49.         [ Links ]

[3] Arvanitis, R., Waast, R. Gaillard, J. 2000. Science in Africa: A bibliometric panorama using PASCAL database. Scientometrics, 47 (30), pp. 457-473.         [ Links ]

[4] Beaver, D.D. 2001. Reflections on scientific collaboration and its study: Past, present and future. Scientometrics, 52(3), pp. 365-377.         [ Links ]

[5] Belkhodia, O. & Landry, R. 2007. The Triple-Helix collaboration: Why do researchers collaborate with industry and the government? What are the factors that influence the perceived barriers? Scientometrics, 70 (2), pp. 301-332.         [ Links ]

[6] Blankley, W. & Moses, C. 2009. How innovative is South Africa? South African Journal of Science, 105, pp.15-18.         [ Links ]

[7] Boshoff, N. 2009. Neo-colonialism and research collaboration in Central Africa. Scientometrics, 81(2), pp. 413-434.         [ Links ]

[8] Dastkhan, H. & Owlia, M.S. 2009. Study of trends and perspectives of industrial engineering research. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 20(1), pp.1-12.         [ Links ]

[9] García-Zorita, C., Martín-Moreno, C., Lascurain-Sánchez, M.L. & Sanz-Casado, E. 2006. Institutional addresses in the Web of Science: The effects on scientific evaluation. Journal of Information Science, 32(4), pp. 378-383.         [ Links ]

[10] Gevers, W., Mati, X., Mouton, J., Page-Shipp, R., Hammes, M. & Pouris, A. 2006. Conclusions and recommendations for a strategically enhanced role of research publishing in South Africa. In Report on a Strategic Approach to Research Publishing in South Africa in South Africa, pp. 107-120. Pretoria: The Academy of Science of South Africa.         [ Links ]

[11] Glänzel, W., Janssens, F. & Thijs, B. 2009. A comparative analysis of publication activity and citation impact based on the core literature in bioinformatics Scientometrics, 79(1), pp.109-129.         [ Links ]

[12] Goldfinch, S., Dale, T. & Derouen Jr., K. 2003. Science from the periphery: Collaboration, networks and 'periphery effects' in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1995-2000. Scientometrics, 37(3), pp. 321-337.         [ Links ]

[13] Guan, J. & Ma, N. 2007. A bibliometric study of China's semiconductor literature compared with other major Asian countries. Scientometrics, 70(1), pp. 107-124.         [ Links ]

[14] Hicks D.M. & Katz J.S. 1996. Where is science going? Science Technology & Human Values, 21(4), pp. 379-406.         [ Links ]

[15] Ingwersen, P. & Jacobs, D. 2004. South African research in selected scientific areas: Status 1981-2000. Scientometrics, 59(3), pp. 405-423.         [ Links ]

[16] Jacobs, D. & Ingwersen, P. 2000. A bibliometric study of the publication patterns in the sciences of South African scholars 1981-96. Scientometrics, 47(1), pp. 75-93.         [ Links ]

[17] Katz, J.S. & Martin, B.R. 1997. What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), pp. 1-18.         [ Links ]

[18] King, D.A. 2004. The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430 (6997), pp. 311-316.         [ Links ]

[19] May, R.M. 1997. The scientific wealth of nations. Science, 275(5301), pp. 793-796.         [ Links ]

[20] Melin, G. 2000. Pragmatism and Self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy, 29(1), pp. 31-40.         [ Links ]

[21] Okubo, Y. & Sjdberg, C. 2000. The changing pattern of industrial scientific research collaboration in Sweden. Research Policy, 29(1), pp. 81-98.         [ Links ]

[22] Page-Shipp, R. & Hammes, M. 2009. Global eResearch trends and their implications for South African research publishing in print and online, in ASSAF Ed., Report on a Strategic Approach to Research Publishing in South Africa, pp. 81-105. Pretoria: The Academy of Science of South Africa.         [ Links ]

[23] Pouris, A. 2006. A bibliometric assessment of South African research publications included in the internationally indexed database of Thomson ISI. In Report on a Strategic Approach to Research Publishing in South Africa in South Africa, pp. 9-29. Pretoria: Academy of Science of South Africa.         [ Links ]

[24] Pouris, A. 2009. Quantitative assessment of South Africa's inventive outputs: International patent analysis. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 20(1), pp. 13-29.         [ Links ]

[25] Rabkin, Y.M., Eisemon, T.O., Lafitte-Houssat, J.-J. & Rathgeber, E.M. 1979. Citation visibility of Africa's science. Social Studies of Science, 9 (4), pp. 499-506.         [ Links ]

[26] Ren, S.L. & Rousseau, R. 2002. International visibility of Chinese scientific journals. Scientometrics, 5(33), pp. 389-405.         [ Links ]

[27] Sooryamoorthy, R. 2009. Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications. Scientometrics, 81(1), pp. 171-193.         [ Links ]

[28] Sooryamoorthy, R. 2009. Collaboration and publication: How collaborative are scientists in South Africa? Scientometrics, 80 (2), pp. 419-439.         [ Links ]

[29] Ugolini, D. & Casilli, C. 2003. The visibility of Italian journals. Scientometrics, 56(3), pp. 345-355.         [ Links ]

[30] Uys, J.W., Schutte, C.S.L. & Esterhuizen, D. 2010. Trends in a South African industrial engineering research journal: A textual information analysis perspective. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering. 21 (1), pp.1-16.         [ Links ]

[31] Wagner, C.S. & Leydesdorff, L. 2005. Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34 (10), pp. 1608-1618.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons