Defining 'project governance' for large capital projects

 

 

M.C. Bekker^I; H. Steyn^II

^IGraduate School of Technology Management, University of Pretoria, South Africa machiel.bekker@up.ac.za
^IIGraduate School of Technology Management, University of Pretoria, South Africa herman.steyn@up.ac.za

 

 

---

ABSTRACT

Over the past decade corporate governance has received ample attention. Lately the principles of governance have been applied to other management disciplines, especially project management. The evolution of the concept of 'project governance' resulted in various interpretations and applications of the term, causing confusion among academics and practitioners in various industries. Especially for large capital projects, a formal definition of the term 'project governance', and agreement on the content of a project governance model, have largely been neglected. This paper reports on exploratory work to define the concept of governance for large capital projects. An international Delphi survey, involving credible practitioners and academics, was conducted to define the term 'project governance' better. The paper also introduces a framework for project governance.

---

OPSOMMING

Oor die afgelope dekade het korporatiewe geheelbestuur ('governance') heelwat aandag geniet. Die beginsels van 'governance' is ook in ander bestuursdissiplines, veral projekbestuur, toegepas. Die ontwikkeling van die konsep van 'projekgeheelbestuur' het gelei tot verskeie interpretasies en toepassings van die term, en het tot verwarring by akademici en praktisyns in verskeie bedrywe gelei. Definiëring van die term projekgeheelbestuur, en 'n raamwerk vir groot kapitaalprojekte, is grotendeels nagelaat. Hierdie artikel rapporteer oor verkenningswerk om die konsep van geheelbestuur vir groot kapitaalprojekte te definieer. 'n Internasionale Delphi-ondersoek, waarby geloofwaardige praktisyns en akademici betrek is, is uitgevoer om die term te definieer. Die artikel stel ook 'n raamwerk vir projekgeheelbestuur voor.

---

 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format” 

 

 

REFERENCES

[1] The United States of America. 2002. The Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. Government Printer.         [ Links ]

[2] Cadbury, A.1992. Cadbury Report on Corporate Governance, London: IOD.         [ Links ]

[3] King Committee on Corporate Governance. 2002. King Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa - 2002 [King Report 2002], Johannesburg: Institute Of Directors in South Africa.         [ Links ]

[4] Micklethwait, J. & Wooldridge, A. 2003. The Company: A short history of a revolutionary idea, London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.         [ Links ]

[5] Gillibrand, M. 2004. New frontiers for corporate governance in 2004 and beyond, Corporate Governance Journal, 4(1), pp. 4-21.         [ Links ]

[6] Miller, R. & Lessard, D. (eds). 2000. The strategic management of large engineering projects: Shaping institutions, risks, and governance, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.         [ Links ]

[7] Merrow, E., McDonnell, L. & Argüden. 1988. Understanding the outcomes of megaprojects: A quantitative analysis of very large civilian projects, The Rand Corporation Publication Series #R-3560-PSSP (March 1988).         [ Links ]

[8] Morris, P.W.G. & Hough, G.H. 1987. The anatomy of major projects: A study of the reality of project management, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.         [ Links ]

[9] Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. 2003. Megaprojects and risk: An anatomy of ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.         [ Links ]

[10] Skamris, M.K. 1994. Large transport projects: Forecast versus actual traffic and costs, Report No.151, Aalborg: Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University.         [ Links ]

[11] Liu, L. & Yetton, P. 2005. The contingent effects of project governance mechanisms on project delivery capability and the level of control - evidence from the construction and IT services industries, Pan-Pacific Business Conference, 2005, Shanghai, China.         [ Links ]

[12] Turbit, N. 2003. IT governance and project governance, The Project Perfect White Paper Collection, www.projectperfect.com.         [ Links ]

[13] The Association for Project Management (APM). 2005. A guide to governance of project management, www.apm.org.uk.         [ Links ]

[14] Dalkey, N & Helmer, O. 1963. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts, Management Science, 9, pp. 458-67.         [ Links ]

[15] Lindeman, C.A. 1975. Delphi survey of priorities in clinical nursing research, Nursing Research, 24 (6), pp. 434-42.         [ Links ]

[16] Phillips, R. 2000. New applications for the Delphi technique, Annual 'San Diego' Pfeiffer and Company, 2, pp. 191-196.         [ Links ]

[17] Xiao, J., Douglas, D., Lee, A.H. & Vemuri, S.R. 1997. A Delphi evaluation of the factors influencing length of stay in Australian hospitals, International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 12 (3), pp. 207-18.         [ Links ]

[18] Page, C. & Meyer, D. 2005. Applied research design for business and management, Australia: McGraw-Hill.         [ Links ]

[19] OECD. 2004. Principles of corporate governance, 2004 edition, OECD Publication Services, France.         [ Links ]

[20] United Nations Economic and Social Council. 2005. Governance in public-private partnerships for infrastructure development, TRADE/WP.5/2005/2.         [ Links ]

 

 

*This paper was presented at the IEEE Africon 2007 Conference in Windhoek, Namibia. The paper is reproduced with the kind permission of Africon and IEEE.