SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 issue1 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


South African Journal of Industrial Engineering

On-line version ISSN 2224-7890
Print version ISSN 1012-277X

S. Afr. J. Ind. Eng. vol.20 n.1 Pretoria  2009

 

A productivity evaluation model based on input and output orientations

 

 

C.O. AnyaecheI; A.E.OluleyeII

IDepartment of Industrial and Production Engineering, University of Ibadan, Nigeria osita.anyaeche@mail.ui.edu.ng
IIDepartment of Industrial and Production Engineering, University of Ibadan, Nigeria ayodeji.oluleye@mail.ui.edu.ng

 

 


ABSTRACT

Many productivity models evaluate either the input or the output performances using standalone techniques. This sometimes gives divergent views of the same system's results. The work reported in this article, which simultaneously evaluated productivity from both orientations, was applied on real life data. The results showed losses in productivity (-2%) and price recovery (-8%) for the outputs; the inputs showed productivity gain (145%) but price recovery loss (-63%). These imply losses in product performances but a productivity gain in inputs. The loss in the price recovery of inputs indicates a problem in the pricing policy. This model is applicable in product diversification.


OPSOMMING

Die meeste produktiwiteitsmodelle evalueer of die inset- of die uitsetverrigting deur gebruik te maak van geïsoleerde tegnieke. Dit lei soms tot uiteenlopende perspektiewe van dieselfde sisteem se verrigting. Hierdie artikel evalueer verrigting uit beide perspektiewe en gebruik ware data. Die resultate toon 'n afname in produktiwiteit (-2%) en prysherwinning (-8%) vir die uitsette. Die insette toon 'n toename in produktiwiteit (145%), maar 'n afname in prysherwinning (-63%). Dit impliseer 'n afname in produkverrigting, maar 'n produktiwiteits-toename in insette. Die afname in die prysherwinning van insette dui op 'n problem in die prysvasstellingbeleid. Hierdie model is geskik vir produkdiversifikasie.


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format” 

 

 

REFERENCES

[1] Agrell, P.J. and Wikner, J. 1996. A coherent methodology for productivity analysis employing integrated partial efficiency. International Journal of Production Economics, 46-47 (1996) 401-411.         [ Links ]

[2] Anyaeche, C.O. 2006. The development of input, output and linear programming-based productivity evaluation model for a manufacturing firm. PhD thesis in the Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, University of Ibadan, Ibadan.         [ Links ]

[3] Anyaeche, C.O. and Oluleye, A.E. 1999. Profitability and productivity evaluation: A two-phase approach. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Nigerian Institute of Industrial Engineers, pp 37-50.         [ Links ]

[4] Anyaeche, C.O. and Oluleye, A.E. 2003. A multi-attribute productivity model. Nigerian Journal of Industrial and System Studies, Vol. 2, No3, pp 20-28.         [ Links ]

[5] Chan, S.K. 2000. Sustainable productivity: Asian Productivity Center at 40. Electronic Journal.         [ Links ]

[6] Grossman, E.S. 1993. How to measure company productivity. Ed: Christopher, W. F. et al, Productivity Press, Oregon, pp 6-1.3 - 6-21. NY: North River Press.         [ Links ]

[7] Hayzen, A.J. and Reeve, J.M. 2000. Examining relationships in productivity. Accounting Management Accounting Quarterly, Summer 2000.         [ Links ]

[8] National Productivity Centre, and Nigerian Institute of Industrial Engineers. 1989. A proposal for developing and testing a National Productivity Guideline.         [ Links ]

[9] Prasad, B. 1999. A model for optimizing performance based on reliability, life-circle costs and other measurements. Production Planning and Control. Vol. 10, No.30, pp 286-300.         [ Links ]

[10] Prokopenko, J. 1987. Productivity and management: A Practical Handbook. International Labour Office, Geneva.         [ Links ]

[11] Rao, M.P. 2000. A simple method to link productivity to profitability. Management Accounting Quarterly, Summer 2000.         [ Links ]

[12] Sumanth, D. 1983. Productivity engineering and management. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.         [ Links ]

[13] Swaim J.C. and Sink S.D. 1983. Current developments in firm or corporate level productivity measurement and evaluation: Issues in white collar productivity. Industrial Engineering Conference Proceedings, pp 8-17, Industrial Engineering Management Press.         [ Links ]

[14] Tangen, S. 2002. Understanding the concept of productivity. Proceedings of the 7th Asian Pacific Industrial Engineering and Management System Conference (APIEMS 2002), Taipei. E-copy via the Internet, accessed November 2002.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License