SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 número1Quantitative assessment of South Africa's inventive outputs: International patent analysisA productivity evaluation model based on input and output orientations índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


South African Journal of Industrial Engineering

versión On-line ISSN 2224-7890
versión impresa ISSN 1012-277X

S. Afr. J. Ind. Eng. vol.20 no.1 Pretoria  2009

 

Evaluating and refining the 'Enterprise Architecture as strategy' approach and artefacts

 

 

M. de VriesI; A.C.J. van RensburgII

IDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Pretoria, South Africa marne.devries@up.ac.za,
IIDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Pretoria, South Africa antoniej@up.ac.za

 

 


ABSTRACT

Enterprise Architecture (EA) is a new discipline that has emerged from the need to create a holistic view of an enterprise, and thereby to discover business/IT integration and alignment opportunities across enterprise structures. Previous EA value propositions that merely focus on IT cost reductions will no longer convince management to invest in EA. Today, EA should enable business strategy in the organisation to create value. This resides in the ability to do enterprise optimisation through process standardisation and integration. In order to do this, a new approach is required to integrate EA into the strategy planning process of the organisation.
This article explores the use of three key artefacts - operating models, core diagrams, and an operating maturity assessment as defined by Ross, Weill & Robertson [1] - as the basis of this new approach. Action research is applied to a research group to obtain qualitative feedback on the practicality of the artefacts.


OPSOMMING

Ondernemingsargitektuur (OA) is 'n nuwe dissipline wat ontstaan het uit die behoefte om 'n holistiese perspektief van 'n onderneming te skep om sodoende besigheid/IT-integrasie en -belyningsgeleenthede regoor ondernemingstrukture te ontdek. Vorige OA waarde-aanbiedings wat hoofsaaklik gefokus het op IT kostebesparings sal bestuur nie meer kan oorreed om in OA te belê nie. Vandag behoort OA bevoegdheid te gee aan onderneming-strategie om werklik waarde te skep. Hierdie bevoegdheid lê gesetel in ondernemingso-ptimering deur middel van prosesstandaardisasie en -integrasie. 'n Nuwe benadering word benodig ten einde OA te integreer met die strategiese beplanningsproses van die organisasie.
Hierdie artikel ondersoek die gebruik van drie artefakte - operasionele modelle, kerndiagramme, en operasionele volwassenheidsassessering soos gedefinieer deur Ross, Weill & Robertson [1] - as die basis van hierdie nuwe benadering. Aksienavorsing word toegepas op 'n navorsingsgroep ten einde kwalitatiewe terugvoer te kry oor die praktiese sin van die artefakte.


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format” 

 

 

REFERENCES

[1] Ross, J.W., Weill, P. and Robertson, D.C. 2006. Enterprise Architecture as strategy. Creating a foundation for business execution. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.         [ Links ]

[2] Zachman, J.A. 1987. 'A framework for information systems architecture', IBM Systems Journal, 26(3), pp. 276-292.         [ Links ]

[3] Zachman, J.A. 1996. 'Enterprise Architecture: The issue of the century'.         [ Links ] [online] URL: http://mega.ist.utl.pt/-ic-atsi7TheIssueOfTheCentury.pdf. Accessed on 13 November 2007.

[4] O'Rourke, C., Fishman, N. and Selkow, W. 2003. Enterprise Architecture using the Zachman Framework. Boston, Massachusetts: Thomson Course Technology.         [ Links ]

[5] TOGAF Version 8.1, enterprise edition.         [ Links ] [online] URL: www.opengroup.org/ architecture/togaf8/downloads.htm#Non-Member. Accessed 13 November 2007.

[6] Theuerkorn, F. 2005. Lightweight enterprise architectures. New York: Auerbach Publications.         [ Links ]

[7] Lapkin, A. 2006. 'Gartner defines the term "enterprise architecture"', Gartner Research, ID Number: G00141795.         [ Links ]

[8] Handler, R. 2004. Enterprise Architecture is dead - long live Enterprise Architecture. http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/columns/article.php/11079_3347711_1. Accessed 5 Jan 2007.         [ Links ]

[9] Boar, B. H. 1999. Constructing blueprints for enterprise IT architecture. New York: J. Wiley.         [ Links ]

[10] Bernard, S.A. 2005. An introduction to Enterprise Architecture EA3. 2nd edition. Bloomington: AuthorHouse.         [ Links ]

[11] Schekkerman, J. 2004. How to survive in the jungle of Enterprise Architecture frameworks. 2nd edition. Victoria: Trafford Publishing.         [ Links ]

[12] Wagter, R., Van den Berg, M., Luijpers, J. and Van Steenberg, M. 2005. Dynamic Enterprise Architecture - How to make it work. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.         [ Links ]

[13] Kaisler, S.H., Armour, F. and Valivullah, M. 2005. Enterprise architecting: Critical problems, Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE CS Press: 224b.         [ Links ]

[14] Malan, R. and Bredemeyer, D. 2005. 'Enterprise Architecture as strategic differentiator', Cutter Consortium Executive Report, 8(6), pp. 1-23.         [ Links ]

[15] Rosser, B. 2004. 'Sell the value of architecture to the business', Gartner Research, ID Number: G00123412.         [ Links ]

[16] Lapkin, A. 2005. 'Business strategy defines Enterprise Architecture value', Gartner Research, ID Number: G00129604.         [ Links ]

[17] Kreizman, G., Knox, M. and James, G.A. 2005. 'IT cost reduction and performance improvement provide the most value for Enterprise Architecture', Gartner Research, ID Number: G00130524.         [ Links ]

[18] Johnson, G., Scholes, K. and Whittington, R. 2005. Exploring corporate strategy. London: Prentice Hall.         [ Links ]

[19] Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. 1996. The balanced scorecard. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.         [ Links ]

[20] Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. 2004. Strategy maps: converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.         [ Links ]

[21] Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. 2006. Alignment - using the balanced scorecard to create corporate strategies. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.         [ Links ]

[22] Hodgkinson, C.A. and Maree, J.G. 1998. 'Action research: some guidelines for first-time researchers in education', Journal of Education and Training, 19(2), pp. 51-65.         [ Links ]

[23] Schekkerman, J. 2006. Enterprise Architecture survey 2006, Institute for Enterprise Architecture Developments (IFEAD). http://enterprise-architecture.info/EA_Survey_2006.htm. Accessed 6 November 2007.         [ Links ]

[24] Haunert, T. 2008. 'Want your own FREE subscription?', Oracle Magazine, June/July, p. 64.         [ Links ]

[25] Matthee, M.C., Tobin, P.K.J. and Van der Merwe, P. 2007. 'The status quo of Enterprise Architecture implementation in South African financial services companies', South African Journal of Business Management, 38(1), pp. 11-23.         [ Links ]

[26] Porter, M.E. 2004. Competitive advantage - creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons