SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.19 número1 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


South African Journal of Industrial Engineering

versión On-line ISSN 2224-7890
versión impresa ISSN 1012-277X

S. Afr. J. Ind. Eng. vol.19 no.1 Pretoria  2008

 

A comparative study of automation strategies at Volkswagen in Germany and South Africa

 

 

O. Wessel; I. Gorlach

School of Engineering, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, South Africa igor.gorlach@nmmu.ac.za

 

 


ABSTRACT

The final car assembly lines at Volkswagen's production sites in Germany and South Africa are analysed to determine the best automation level based on cost, productivity, quality, and flexibility for a plant location. The methodology used is proposed by the Fraunhofer Institute. The final assembly processes are analysed and classified according to the automation level. The operations are evaluated at every level of automation based on information from existing factories. If the best levels of automation for all the parameters correspond, the optimal level of automation for a plant is reached. Otherwise, improvements and/or additional considerations are required to optimise the automation level. The result of the analysis indicates that the highest automation level is not necessarily the best in terms of cost and quality, and some de-automation is required. The analysis also shows that a low automation level can result in poor product quality and low productivity. The best automation strategy should be based on the analysis of all the aspects of the process in the local context.


OPSOMMING

Die finale monteerlyne by Volkswagen se aanlegte in Duitsland en Suid-Afrika is ontleed om die beste outomatisasievlak te bepaal gebaseer op koste, produktiwiteit, gehalte en aanpasbaarheid gegee die ligging. Die metodologie wat gevolg is, word voorgestel deur die Fraunhofer Instituut. Die finale monteer-prosesse is ontleed volgens outomatisasievlak. Die aktiwiteite is ontleed teen elke vlak van outomatisasie gebaseer op inligting van bestaande vervaardigingsaanlegte. Indien die beste outomatisasievlakke vir alle parameters ooreenstem, dan is die optimale vlak van outomatisasie bereik. Indien nie, is verbeterings en/of addisionele oorwegings nodig om die outomatisasievlak te optimiseer. Die resultaat van die ontleding toon dat die grootste mate van outomatisasie nie noodwendig die beste is in terme van koste en gehalte nie, en dat 'n mate van 'de-outomatisasie' benodig word. Die ontleding toon verder dat lae vlakke van outomatisasie kan lei tot swak produkgehalte en lae produktiwiteit. Die beste outomatisasiestrategie moet dus gebaseer word op 'n ontleding van al die prosesaspekte in 'n plaaslike konteks.


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

REFERENCES

[1] Lay, G. and Schirrmeister, E., 2001. Sackgasse Hochautomatisierung? PI- Mitteilung. N 22, ISI, Fraunhofer.         [ Links ]

[2] Kotha, S. and Swamidass, P. M., 2000. Strategy, advanced manufacturing technology and empirical evidence from U.S. manufacturing. Journal of Operations Management, 18, 257-277.         [ Links ]

[3] Porter, M., 1980. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. The Free Press, New York.         [ Links ]

[4] Mintzberg, H., 1988. Generic strategies: toward a comprehensive framework. In Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 5. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.         [ Links ]

[5] Kotha, S., and Orne, D., 1989. Generic manufacturing strategies: a conceptual synthesis. Strategic Management Journal 10/3, 211-231.         [ Links ]

[6] Hill, C., 1988. Differentiation versus low cost or differentiation and low cost: a contingency framework. Academy of Management Review 13, 401-412.         [ Links ]

[7] Fichtmüller, N. , 1996. Rationalisierung durch flexible, hybride Montagesysteme, Heidelberg.         [ Links ]

[8] Hartmann, M., 1993. Entwicklung eines Kostenmodells für die Montage -Ein Hilfsmittel zur Montageanlagenplanung, Aachen.         [ Links ]

[9] Ross, P., 2002. Bestimmung des wirtschaftlichen Automatisierungsgrades von Montage-Prozessen in der frühen Phase der Montageplanung, Munich.         [ Links ]

[10] Tomys, A.K., 1995. Kostenorientiertes Qualitatsmanagement, Qualitats-controlling zur standigen Verbesserung der Unternehmensprozesse, Munich.         [ Links ]

[11] Heinen, E., 1978. Industriebetriebslehre: Entscheidungen im Industrie-betrieb, Gabler, 147.         [ Links ]

 

 

1 The author was enrolled for the M Tech (Industrial Engineering) Degree at the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons