SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.19 número1Note from the EditorEnterprise resource planning solution selection criteria in medium-sized South African companies índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


South African Journal of Industrial Engineering

versão On-line ISSN 1012-277X

S. Afr. J. Ind. Eng. vol.19 no.1 Pretoria  2008

 

Enterprise Architecture - New business value perspectives

 

 

M. de VriesI; A.C. J van RensburgII

IDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Pretoria, South Africa marne.devries@up.ac.za
IIDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Pretoria, South Africa antoniej@up.ac.za

 

 


ABSTRACT

Organisations today are characterised by conglomerate organisation structures that evolve through mergers and acquisitions. Corporate offices need to add superior knowledge and skills to ensure that the collection of diverse businesses is operating as more than independent units. A new management approach is required to create synergies between the diverse businesses, their processes and system landscapes. Enterprise Architecture (EA) creates value on a corporate level by facilitating process/information technology alignment and synergy between different strategic business units (SBUs). Unfortunately many EA implementations seemed to fail owing to a short-term financial focus and measurement.
This article explores the possibilities of linking EA to a corporate balanced scorecard (BSC) to demonstrate its long-term financial improvement capabilities in supporting the business strategy. The aim is to use the corporate BSC context to direct EA objectives in creating contextualised value for a specific enterprise.


OPSOMMING

Organisasies word vandag gekenmerk deur konglomeraatorganisasiestrukture wat groei deur middel van die samesmelting en oorname van ander organisasies. Korporaatkantore sal hoër-staande kennis en vaardighede moet toevoeg om te verseker dat die versameling van diverse besighede groter is as wanneer hul onafhanklik van mekaar opereer. 'n Nuwe bestuursbenadering word benodig om sinergieë tussen die diverse besighede, hul prosesse en stelsel-landskappe te skep. Ondernemingsargitektuur (OA) skep waarde op 'n korporatiewe vlak deur die fasilitering van proses/inligtingtegnologiebelyning en sinergie-skepping tussen verskillende strategiese besigheidseenhede. Ongelukkig faal vele OA projekte weens 'n kort-termyn finansiële fokus en prestasie-meting.
Hierdie artikel ondersoek die moontlikheid om OA te koppel aan 'n korporatiewe gebalanseerde telkaart (KBT) om sodanig OA se lang-termyn finansiële verbeteringsvermoë ter ondersteuning van besigheidstrategie te demonstreer. Die KBT konteks word dus gebruik om OA doelwitte te rig om gekontekstualiseerde waarde vir 'n spesifieke ondernening te skep.


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

 

REFERENCES

[1] Wagter, R., van den Berg, M., Luijpers, J. & van Steenberg, M. 2005. Dynamic Enterprise Architecture - How to make it work. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.         [ Links ]

[2] Theuerkorn, F. 2005. Lightweight Enterprise Architectures. Auerbach Publications, New York.         [ Links ]

[3] Schekkerman, J. 2004. How to survive in the jungle of Enterprise Architecture frameworks. Second edition, Trafford Publishing, Canada.         [ Links ]

[4] Ross, J.W., Weill, P. & Robertson, D.C. 2006. Enterprise Architecture as strategy: Creating a foundation for business execution. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts.         [ Links ]

[5] Bernard, S.A. 2005. An introduction to Enterprise Architecture EA3. Second edition, Authorhouse, Bloomington, USA.         [ Links ]

[6] Lankhorst, M. 2005. Enterprise Architecture at work. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.         [ Links ]

[7] Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P. 1996. The Balanced Scorecard. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts.         [ Links ]

[8] Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P. 2004. Strategy maps: Converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts.         [ Links ]

[9] Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P. 2006. Alignment - using the Balanced Scorecard to create corporate strategies. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts. 2006.         [ Links ]

[10] Boar, B. H. 1999. Constructing blueprints for Enterprise IT Architectures. John Wiley, New York.         [ Links ]

[11] Iyamu, T. 2002. Enterprise Architecture as an enterprise change agent. Thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for Masters in Information Management, University of the Western Cape.         [ Links ]

[12] Treacy M. & Wiersma, F. 1995. The discipline of market leaders: Choose your customers, narrow your focus, dominate your market. HarperCollins, London.         [ Links ]

[13] Hax, A. & Wilde, D. 2001. The Delta Project: Discovering new sources of profitability in a networked economy. New York, Palgrave.         [ Links ]

[14] Macgregor, S. 2007. EA enduring competitive advantage. Newsletter. June.         [ Links ]

[15] Scott, A.B. 2005. An introduction to Enterprise Architecture, second edition. Authorhouse, Bloomington, United States of America.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License