SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.32 issue3 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Curationis

On-line version ISSN 2223-6279
Print version ISSN 0379-8577

Curationis vol.32 n.3 Pretoria  2009

 

RESEARCH ARTICLE

 

An assessment of teaching strategies used by lecturers at a nursing college in Mpumalanga

 

 

TJ MaunyeI; SM MeyerII; CE van VeldenIII

IM Cur (Nursing Education). Lecturer Mpumalanga Nursing College
IIPhD (Computer Integrated Education). Previous Senior Lecturer University of Pretoria
IIIM Cur (Nursing Education). Lecturer University of Pretoria

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

The need for the utilization of various teaching strategies by lecturers when facilitating learning cannot be overemphasized. The aim of this study was to establish if lecturers at a Nursing College in Mpumalanga were using teaching strategies that could facilitate the personal development of nursing learners. A quantitative approach was followed for this studv. The participants of the study were all lecturers at a Nursing College in Mpumalanga. Data was gathered by means of a questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to describe and summarize data regarding the type of teaching strategies used and the recommendations that could enhance the utilization of various teaching strategies. The data revealed that the teaching strategies mostly utilized required active participation of the learners namely: formal/informal writing of assignments; learner-led class presentation; group sessions; clinical case studies; role-playing and clinical rounds. Inclusion of certain strategies such as problem-based learning, structured accompaniment and computer literacy for learners could enhance the personal development of nursing learners.
Although lecturers did use some of the teaching strategies that could enhance the personal development of nursing learners, staff development regarding the utilization of various teaching strategies was highlighted as an important factor to be considered. Other findings revealed that lack of resources have a negative influence on the utilization of various teaching strategies.

Key words: teaching strategy, personal development, lecturer


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

References

AMOS, E & WHITE, MJ 1998: Problem Based Learning. Teaching Tools, Nurse Educator, 23 (2): 1-4.         [ Links ]

BEST, DL & ROSE, ML 1996: Quality Supervision. Theory and Practice for Clinical Supervisions. Saunders: London.         [ Links ]

HINCHL1FF, S 1996: The Practitioner as Teacher. Baillere Tindall: London.         [ Links ]

JACOBS, M; VAKALISA, N & GAWE, N 2008: Teaching - learning Dynamics. Heinemann: South Africa.         [ Links ]

KELLY, CM 2002: Investing in the future of Nursing Education: Cry for action. Nursing Education Perspective. 23 (1):3-6.         [ Links ]

LOVING, GL & WILSON, JS 2000: Infusing Critical Thinking into the Nursing Curriculum through Facility Development. Nurse Education. 25 (2): 1-7.         [ Links ]

LUNYK-CHILD, OI; CROOKS, D; ELLIS, PJ; OFOSU, C; O'MARA & RIDEOUT, E 2001. Self-directed Learning: Faculty and Students Perceptions. Journal of Nursing Education. 40 (3): 116-122.         [ Links ]

MEYER, SM; VAN NIEKERK, SE & NAUDE, M 2004; The Nursing Unit Manager. Comprehensive Guide. Second Edition. Heinemann: Sandton.         [ Links ]

MORALES-MANN, ET & KAITELL, CA 2001 : Problem-Based Learning in a new Canadian Curriculum. Issues and Innovations in Nursing Education. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 33 (1): 1 and 14.         [ Links ]

PARAHOO, AK1997: Nursing Research, Principles, Process and Issues. Macmillan Press Ltd: London.         [ Links ]

POLIT, DF & HUNGLER, BP 1999: Essentials of Nursing Research, Methods, Appraisal and Utilization. Fourth Edition. Philadelphia. New York.         [ Links ]

SHELL, R 2001: Perceived Barriers to Teaching for Critical Thinking by BSN Nursing Faculty. Nursing and Health Care Perspectives. 22 (6): 7-8.         [ Links ]

SIMPSON, E & COURTNEY, M 2002: Critical Thinking in Nursing Education: Literature Review. Nurse Practice. 8 (2): 4,8-9.         [ Links ]

SOUTH AFRICAN PUBLICATION OFTHE SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATION AUTHORITY.         [ Links ] [S.a.]: The National Qualification Framework. An Overview. Pretoria. : Policy Regarding Nursing Education. Pretoria: SANC.

SOUTH AFRICAN NURSING COUNCIL 1985: Guidelines for the Course Leading to Registration as a Nurse (General, Psychiatric and Community) and Midwifery. Pretoria: SANC.         [ Links ]

TILLEMA, HH 1998: Design and Validity of Portfolio Instrument for Professional Training. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 24 (3): 263-264.         [ Links ]

THOMPSON, C & BARTELS, JE 1999: Outcomes Assessment: Implications for Nursing Education. Journal of Professional Nursing. 15 (31): 171-172.         [ Links ]

VAN DER HORST, H & MC DONALD, F 2003: Outcomes-Based Education: Theory and Practice. Tee Vee printers and publishers: Cape Town.         [ Links ]

VLOK, ME 1996: Manual of Community Nursing and Communicable Diseases. Fifth Edition. Juta and Co, LTD: Cape Town.         [ Links ]

YOUNGBLOOD, N & BERTZ, JM 2001: Developing Critical Thinking with Active Learning Strategies. Nurse Education. 26(3):2-3.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
Mrs CE van Velden
Department of Nursing Science
PO Box 667, Pretoria, 0001
Fax: (012) 3541490; Tel : (012) 3542131
Email: christine.vanvelden@up.ac.za

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License